NekoHomey Purely Joyful Movie!

Glucedee It's hard to see any effort in the film. There's no comedy to speak of, no real drama and, worst of all.

Jonah Abbott There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.

Hattie I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

Michael Ledo Katie (Jo Hartley) and Jeff (James Doherty) are two social workers who take four troubled teens to a remote cottage in a remote village for...I am not sure what, but they are there. The townsfolk all seem to have the same bad teeth and large ears. After a run in, our heroes become the main attraction in a theater one might see in "Blood Sucking Freaks" complete with a bare bottomed organ player right out of Monty Python.The theater aspect, which was by far the highlight of the film, needed a third act. There was significant internal conflict within the teen group which served more as a distraction. Instead they should have used this as an opportunity to develop dark humor. The film is also sold as a comedy, but the humor was more in their outfits. The production certainly has the potential to achieve cult status as it has all the qualifications, but for me it fell short. Personally I prefer "House of a 1,000 Corpses" or "10,000 Maniacs" or "Blood Sucking Freaks" for this type of cult genre.Recommend as a strong cult rental. Parental Guide: Frequent F-bombs, attempted rape, sex play, male rear nudity.

Coventry I dated a girl from North Yorkshire for a while and, let me tell you, the alleged local characters in this film are a lot more civilized and sophisticated than the real inhabitants of that region! Just kidding, of course, Yorkshire people are very nice and the city of York itself is a highly recommended place to visit. What we have here is a straightforward and unmistakable UK-version of "2000 Maniacs", and thus another umpteenth gory horror flick dealing with deranged, bloodthirsty and drooling hillbillies slaughtering a bunch of (somewhat) innocent people unfortunate enough to be passing through the village. I promised myself I wouldn't be watching derivative horror flicks like these for a while, but I seem to be drawn to them like flies to; - you know. "Inbred" is the type of film that exactly does what it promises on the tin, and in case you expected anything more, else or better, you only have yourself to blame. The film still starts off rather slow and tedious, with overlong and too detailed introductions of lead characters you know are going to die violently anyways, but once around the 45' mark, "Inbred" is an unrelentingly engrossing and trashy splatter flick. Four juvenile delinquents and their two counsellors are on a reform trip up in Northern Yorkshire. They deserve everything what's coming to them, since nobody should be as dumb to rent a cabin in a village called "Mortlake" or visit the local tavern that is named "The Dirty Hole". After being served lemonade that tastes like urine (it probably is urine) and hairy pork scratchings, the young thugs run into trouble with the locals and all hell breaks loose. If you're a fan of gore & filth, you simply must appreciate most of the butchering in "Inbred". The hicks, joyously led by hyperactive Seamus O'Neill, murder some of their victims live on stage during a sort of freaky circus show and there's plenty of bloodshed via shotguns, speeding vans, landmines and bear traps. The CGI isn't always convincing, but the gore certainly is extreme and repulsive! The mandatory banjo-music and folklore songs are naturally present as well, and the ending is much bleaker and nihilistic than I expected. Writer/director Alex Chandon will obviously never win any major film awards, but "Inbred" at least proves that he has enormously developed already since "Cradle of Fear" in 2001. That film was gross and sickening too, but even more dumb, amateurish and annoying. Recommended, but not whilst you're eating!

edgalarza I watched this film based on the trailer and perhaps the trailer ruined it for me. Most of the kills are shown in the trailer so there weren't much new to see in the film. The kills are few and far spaced out in between each other with the longest dry spot happens soon after the first two murdered victims. Because of this, the film doesn't build any kind of momentum and the dialog feels monotonous, the whole film was very sluggish for me. The comedy is dim-witted and not very funny. Having said that, the special effects and methods of the kills are very good, gory and creative, but not enough to make up for what seem to be an arduous viewing. If this film came up on cable TV, I would tell a friend to shut off the television and just go for a walk outside.

Graeme Pryce This is the kind of film where the trailer doesn't really do it justice. To show the best of the film in the trailer would spoil the plot, so it seems to just set the mood instead.Encountering this film on the late night horror channel - which usually shows some pretty dismal stuff I wasn't expecting much but i got a surprise. Quite a few actually . . . The cast is great and in many ways the 'inbred' characters are as entertaining and, dare I say - endearing as the heroes and heroines. UK watchers will notice a few well known faces playing characters that are really outside their usual roles, which may make the film more entertaining to a British audience than an American one but I think the scenes of camp gore and torture would satisfy anybody who claims to be a horror fan.There are some great moments, some shocking moments and certainly some surprises. Don't expect a cerebral plot or an exercise in deep meaning, but do expect some great tributes to classic horror, some genuinely entertaining performances and a slick little production that proves just how good British film making can still be.