Exoticalot People are voting emotionally.

Borserie it is finally so absorbing because it plays like a lyrical road odyssey that’s also a detective story.

Kirandeep Yoder The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Zlatica One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

John Doe The same boring story line is applied here with new actors this time and is on the same level as the first.I give I Still Know What You Did Last Summer a 5/10

Leofwine_draca This dumb-as-nails sequel proved to be a temporary final nail in the coffin for the short-lived I KNOW franchise, thank goodness. It also happens to be one of the worst slasher films out there – a god-awful, boring, and utterly clichéd and predictable attempt at a genre already dried out before the film went into production. Dull characters, a moronic, lowest-common-denominator script, and a lack of action all round make this a real chore to sit through. The script is littered with unintentional stupidity and even though it's well-shot throughout, director Danny Cannon can make nothing of this vapid, senseless mess. Watch out for the scene where a girl is frying on a locked sun-bed as her friends take forever to smash the lock, not noticing the dial nearby which would turn it off and save her from harm.The characters range from the irritating to the truly obnoxious – who the heck is Brandy and who thought that she had any acting capabilities whatsoever? Jennifer Love Hewitt is especially bland here and gives a worse performance than in the original, where she looked better surrounded by a couple of decent actors. Here, she's the best actress in the film, and it makes her look godawful anyway. The male characters are clichéd and dumb, and non-actor Freddie Prinze Jr. returns to go through the most unlikely scenario ever devised. I love the way his half-dead accident victim manages to fist fight the villain at the end of the film, throwing what little credibility there was right out of the window. The only decent actor in the film is Jeffrey Combs and even he is wasted in what amounts to little more than a cameo appearance.Despite the new setting, there is absolutely nothing new added to the slasher genre that we haven't seen before. The minor characters are bumped off until finally the central foursome find themselves pursued by the killer. There are a couple of boring, pointless plot twists which don't make any difference to anything, and an over-the-top finale. The film only picks up pace in the last half hour which means there is a stultifying hour and ten minutes of random boredom before then. There isn't even any decent gore to speak of, the film being surprisingly bloodless considering the certificate. A totally worthless addition to the genre which is not worth a watch by anybody.

edwardkerr OK this is NOT a great horror movie, but some of the criticism makes me cringe.This is simply a continuation of the first movie. At first this did not fill me with joy, the point of the first movie is it is a "whodunnit", how can they continue this when we know who done it? This is addressed in a way I will not spoil here, however I did not predict it until shortly before the reveal.The cast is smaller this time (one or two return from the original but one of them seems like a recurring character for most of the movie). The new cast members really impressed me and the presence of Jack Black made me smile.One thing that bothered me, they arrive on a tropical island full of people partying and having fun... Then out of nowhere everyone except our cast members vanish, just in time for the killer showing up. They attempt to give a small explanation for it but it just seemed lazy.This movie has a much different vibe to the first one, the first has a more tense psychological atmosphere to it, this is more of a stereotypical teen slasher. It therefor has no need to take itself too seriously and has a more outlandish far fetched flow of events. This has gathered much criticism, however a point I'd make, if it kept the exact same atmosphere as the first it would have been accused of being a carbon copy.If you seen the first one then you may as well watch this one as well, I personally prefer it as I thought the reveal of the first movie was mediocre (I hate when the "reveal" is a character we haven't seen a lot of), the plot twists in this involve characters we are following over the course of the movie itself.

RavenGlamDVDCollector It is not that this movie has a bad script, or bad acting. It is the whole concept of this movie that is wrong. It's of course powered by 'let's make another ton of bucks" after the success of I KNOW WHAT YOU DID LAST SUMMER, and despite being a hopeless setup, made even more money than the original. One thing here, Jennifer Love Hewitt is even better in this one than in the previous outing. So I value my DVD, I have nothing to complain about, I collect the pretty actresses on discs - and JLH in here is just wonderful. Those big brown eyes, she is every bit darling. I first saw her as the youngster on PARTY OF FIVE, Season 2. Her character there was more in the background from Season 4, because the actress had business elsewhere. You'd figure, for a good cause. Unfortunately, this movie is such a mess that her terrific looks and tremendous appeal really go to waste.The slasher genre plays to a certain type of individual that is really a questionable creature. They possibly kill little puppies in their spare time, yet society doesn't think of branding them as politically incorrect. Blood and gore is okay, but nudity, no, that is deprived! Blood and gore is not obscene, but just don't show us healthy flesh! It sickens me that you could glorify the viewing of bloody corpses this way. It's one thing to have violence in a story, it is quite another to wallow in the bloody entrails. So, I have no respect for the slasher genre. Occasionally, very pretty actresses are involved, and I let myself in to get offended.Characters that exist for no other reason than to be killed off. A good case in point was that Jack Black character. It was a hopelessly weak performance, but the character also turned out to be absolutely pointless. His kill-off was badly, unconvincingly, portrayed, he'd be an embarrassment at a little backwoods village church benefit performance, I mean, he has a long way to go before being up to that level. And so I could go on, from Jennifer Esposito up to almost all of them. Except Jennifer. She is more than marvelous. But meant for something much better.Not that it ever really came. With hindsight, I know she was never really in the kind of movie a cute girl like that deserves!