Evidence of Blood

1998 "Between the past and present lies a terrifying secret"
6.7| 1h49m| en| More Info
Released: 13 April 1998 Released
Producted By: MGM Television
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

When a brilliant crime writer investigates a 40-year-old murder, he confronts a small town's worst fears.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

MGM Television

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much
SnoReptilePlenty Memorable, crazy movie
Maidexpl Entertaining from beginning to end, it maintains the spirit of the franchise while establishing it's own seal with a fun cast
Humaira Grant It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.
dansview I like David Strathairn. I'm also a writer who loves small towns and has an interest in the South. So theoretically, this movie is my dream come true. It's about a writer who returns to his small Southern town. But it was really low budget and slow.Strathairn is not known for his range.This role was a testimonial to that fact. But for whatever reasons, I just love the guy. I guess it's his sensitive face and the intensity he reflects.I also hate it when non-Southerners try to feign a Southern accent. David did not attempt this here. I suppose it could be explained that his character had been living in N.Y. for years. But Mary McDonnell did it, and it almost ruined the film for me. Ugh! I think a lot of the other actors were faking the accent too and the production values of the flashbacks, etc. were not very good. The plot seemed complex and stacked with clichés. I didn't feel any chemistry between the two leads either.Having said all that, I did enjoy the setting, regardless of the fact that it was filmed in Canada and not in Georgia. I particularly liked the depiction of the old country homes and the acute familiarity of everyone with each other.If you have patience and appreciate moody "who dunnit" films, you were probably appreciate this one. I think it was made for T.V., so no real sex or violence, although there were hints of both.
TedMichaelMor One reviewer described this movie as graceful. It is graceful. This interpretation by Darlene Young of Mr. Cook's novel provides a core that director Andrew Mondsheim turns into an elegantly elegiac narrative. Editing by Bernadette Kelly of Philip Linzey's imaginative cinematography recalls her work on "Dead Ringers" and "Naked Lunch". Ed Hana's production design is subtle and finely nuanced. I particularly like the iconography in the courtroom scenes. The set design there and elsewhere by Megan Less is like her work in other good movies including "The Virgin Suicides". I like the scenes in the dinner. I love the edit to someone cutting hair in a barbershop after a reference that someone the protagonist wants to interview cuts hair. I thought that a lovely and small touch. It made me think of Goddard.Casting impresses me. Mr. Strahairn and Ms. McDonnell perform well together. I like baker-9's thoughtful review of this movie and his observations about the acting. I am a fan of Ms. McDonnell, however. I think she is compelling in her portrayal here. Mr. Strahairn does quietly give a sense of depth to his characters. All the actors convinced me as part of the narrative.The overall film design, with some use of filters in retrospective scenes works—without being distractingly stylized.I agree with reviewer skeckie that this is an almost flawless film narrative. The score stresses the narrative perfectly even though I am one who likes scores that—well work in a different way. In a way, the film recalls in its own way themes from films by Alain Resnais. I understand why someone might find this movie derivative, slow, and repetitive, I do not respond to it that way. I very much enjoyed this lovely little movie. I find it tender and thoughtful.This is at least as good as many BBC mystery films. Savour it.
George Parker A writer (Strathairn) returns to his roots at the death of a friend only to find himself investigating a decades old murder which sent a man to the electric chair on circumstantial evidence. That's the gist of this very ordinary journeyman whodunnit flick which can't conceal what it is; a low budget t.v. product made in Canada. "Evidence of Blood" does nothing to distinguish itself from scores of similar films which are built around a recycled plot tweaked to appear unique. An ordinary couch potato watch at best. (C-)
sheckie Andrew Mondshein has obviously been paying attention. He has created an almost flawless bit of storytelling. From beginning to end its hauntingly beautiful and thought provoking. I compare it favorably to the best works of John Sayles, possibly the finest contemporary american filmmaker. Is it a coincidence that two Sayles veterans David Strathairn and Mary McConnell are excellent in this movie??Its structure is complicated, but it is handled with a deft hand. Bernadette Kelly's editing is seamless. I recommend it very highly to anyone who enjoys a good whodunit or simply a wonderfully crafted entertainment. It certainly does not seem like a TV movie, even if it is a Canadian production, which, of course, are usually superior. Give it many stars.