Exoticalot People are voting emotionally.

TrueHello Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.

Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

chrisjesson In a time awash with fake news on Facebook and Twitter, you don't expect to watch a historical film, with great actors and a massive budget, distort history so blatantly and disrespect the greatest Briton of all time.

Freedom060286 While I do realize Winston Churchill was not a perfect man and he made some serious mistakes in his life, this movie is unfair in it's portrayal of him as an obnoxious alcoholic and a selfish old buffoon who is living in the past. The movie does have some positive aspects, such as the superb work by the cinematographer David Higgs, and some stellar performances by Miranda Richardson, John Slattery, James Purefoy and Julian Wadham.However it is not historically accurate, since Churchill was not stubbornly opposed to the Normandy landing. And there were several other inaccuracies, for example King George's stammer was not nearly as bad as shown in the movie. There really isn't much of a story in this one, except for the historical background of the Normandy invasion.

nwright-56609 I totally agree with all of the other comments - a great man made to look an incompetent leader and the Americans were the best - totally mis-represented any facts - even if there were any - absolute rubbish

z-14380 Portrays one of the most heroic men in British history as a coward. This film is so historically innacurate it borders upon treason. Such a shame the premise of the film had so much potential.