Donald Seymour
This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.
Ezmae Chang
This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.
Deanna
There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.
karen_taylor-41677
Utterly diabolical!!! I love John Hannah and Rupert Everett (hate what he's done to his face mind you) but honest to goodness, wooden acting, parts obviously dubbed with professional audio actors.. I could go on but as I've just wasted a few hours of my life in the vain hope of it getting half watchable, I wont!
Lindsey-Anne
Just turned the TV on, watched literally a few minutes of this and am absolutely stunned that Rupert Everett is in something so, so dreadful! The acting is absolutely appalling... I felt physically uncomfortable at the awkward physicality between the characters and their hammy yet wooden performances... I watched for another fifteen minutes in the hope I had caught it at a bad moment, but nope... What on earth happened?
lynniepinnie22
Because John Hannah and Rupes were in this, I figured I'd give it a go, even though it isn't to my usual taste. Oh dear, five minutes in, and I knew it was going to be baaaad. To begin my list of gripes, I'll write of the acting. To say it was bad isn't doing it justice. It was ATROCIOUS. Wooden, and devoid of expression, (both voice and facial expression were lacking), it was on to a terrible start. It was a bit like it had been dubbed, (and I really do think some of the actors' voices were changed) even though they were clearly speaking English. Of course, and actor is only as good as their script, and this too was woefully inadequate. Clunky, clichéd lines, and characters' picked straight out of a Victorian melodrama. All Rupert Everet needed was a mustache to twirl! And every soapy device in the book was used. Sister steals boyfriend, TICK, a father who abandoned his child nearly dies, cue emotional reunion, where the true meaning of family is discovered...and more, oh much more. Then there were the ballet segments. First, whomever wrote/directed this, clearly has no idea of how a ballet company is run. So didn't bother doing the research and guessed: wrongly. Even the Romeo and Juliet music was the wrong version. Prokofiev is the ballet version. Tchaikovsky's is more a symphony. It isn't a full length ballet. Finally, the child in it. He must be related to someone, because a worse child actor I haven't seen. It was like he read from cue cards, though at least he had the excuse of BEING a child and therefore inexperienced. How this ever got made is beyond me. Why I continued to watch is a bigger mystery. For goodness sake, there are so many talented writers, directors and actors out there. Use them, for all our sakes
alex jones
Really liked this! It was easy to watch & definitely held my attention all the way through. There were twists I didn't see coming and that keep you guessing plus the characters were well-drawn and believable. At the end of part one I was really keen to see part two! Always a good sign. John Hannah should be on TV more often! He's great in it. The other performances were very strong too but it made me realise I hadn't seen him in anything for a while. I didn't recognise the lead actress but thought she was very good & had a lot to do & she did it well. Thought the story was great with a lot of tension - kept me guessing! Funny, sad, people's lives are complicated etc. As good as a night in with a good book. Watch it!
