Zombies! Zombies! Zombies!

2008
3.7| 1h22m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 09 September 2008 Released
Producted By:
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A drug experiment gone wrong produces a league of blood-thirsty zombies. It is up to a small band of exotic dancers trapped in a gentleman's club to fight back. Together they must rely on their wits and skills to survive the night, and pray that they don't become victims of the flesh-eating zombies!

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

ThedevilChoose When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.
Invaderbank The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.
Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.
Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.
BA_Harrison An experimental drug designed to cure cancer is half-inched from a laboratory and winds up being smoked by crack whores who turn into flesh eating zombies that attack the sexy dancers of a nearby strip-club.Take the initials of Zombies!, Zombies!, Zombies!, and what you have is 'ZZZ', which is kinda apt, because the first act of this low-budget zombie comedy horror is in danger of sending the viewer to sleep, despite the sight of several gorgeous women gyrating their goods in front of the camera. It takes quite a while to get to the zombie action, which is preceded by lots of dreadfully inane dialogue between dull characters, as performed by a very wooden cast. The comedy side of things is sorely lacking.Once the flesh-eating begins, the film begins to get a bit more entertaining, with some enthusiastic gore, but an over-reliance on cheap CGI does tend to ruin matters a bit. The film's few practical effects mightn't be that convincing, but they're a damn sight better than the poorly rendered digital effects, best moment being a chainsaw rammed through a zombie's head. As far as the obligatory nudity goes, several of the 'actresses' get their thruppenies out, including tasty blonde Hollie Winnard and top-heavy hottie Jessica Barton.To summarise: Zombies!, Zombies!, Zombies! isn't as much fun as either Zombie Strippers (which came out the same year) or The Big Tits Dragon (2010), but is still more successful than Strippers vs Werewolves (2012), which was utter garbage. I've yet to see Zombies Vs. Strippers (2012).5.5 out of 10, generously rounded up to 6 for IMDb.
Sabalon I love zombie movies and they are always hit or miss. This one started out as a miss, but quickly turned into a decent movie. Good production unlike most, and understandable sound. Too many of these low budget releases try to use the camera mic for the dialog and fail. It is full of funny lines, reoccurring jokes, and references to other films. Some of the acting is stronger than others - but for the most part is a little wooden in the delivery. The main characters do a decent job delivering. The visuals range from weak to funny to decent. Overall if you don't expect something that changes your life, it's worth watching. And if nothing else, pretty girls to watch (however some of the worst fx are the plastic surgeries on some).
Paul Andrews Zombies! Zombies! Zombies! starts as general sleaze ball Lucas turns up at his mate Dr. Stewart's (Michael Clinkenbeard) research laboratory to blag some drugs off him, Dr. Stewart agrees to give Lucas some top quality stuff but it gets mixed up with Dr. Stewart's latest experiment which is a drug for curing cancer. Unfortunately the drug has the unwanted side-effect of turning anyone who takes it into flesh eating zombies. Lucas owes money to pimp Johnny 'Backhand' Vegas (Anthony Headen) who takes the drugs as payment & a couple of his hooker girls steal some & quickly turn into flesh eating zombies & attack some of the girls from the local strip bar who lock themselves inside the bar but are trapped. Can they find a away to escape or will the ever increasing number of zombies outside find a way in & eat them?Also known as Strippers vs. Zombies (the version I saw had this title on the opening credits) this cheap low budget zombie film was directed by Jason Murphy & while it tries to be gory & funny & sexy I didn't think it worked that well & anyone with any level of expectation is going to be disappointed with it. The script is poor really with a lacklustre reason behind the zombie outbreak, all of it's female character's are either prostitutes or strippers, the dialogue is occasionally amusing but the swearing & lame one-liners get tedious & even at only 80 odd minutes in length it's pretty slow going at times. One part of the script I couldn't get my head around was when two of the character's decided to make a run for it to Dr. Stewart's laboratory to try & find a cure & I was sat there thinking why doesn't everyone stuck in the strip club just jump in the car with them & get as far away from the zombies as possible rather then trapping themselves inside the club & why do those two character's even bother going back? The film plays like The Night of the Living Dead (1968) only the human survivors are trapped inside a strip club rather than a farmhouse & there's lots of childish humour that is meant to appeal to the lowest common denominator.The special make-up effects are poor, the CGI effects are terrible with some awful exploding zombies that look really bad & there's not that much gore either. There's a ripped-off arm, some bite wounds, some blood splatter, some gunshot wounds, a little intestine eating & that's it. There's certainly nothing that memorable here & considering the amount of opportunity available there's actually very little nudity either. Sure there are some good looking birds here but is that really enough? I don't think so. The film has that cheap low budget shot on a camcorder look to it & the entire film seems to take place in & around a car park. There are no scares or tension & because of the low budget no sort of atmosphere.The IMDb reckons Zombies! Zombies! Zombies! had a budget of about $30,000 which is low & it does show at times with poor effects, a single location & cheap production values. Apparently shot in Orlando in Florida. The acting is awful & the prolific Tiffany Shepis (she has twenty one acting credits for the year 2009 alone) is the only cast member of note.Zombies! Zombies! Zombies! is a poor low budget zombie film that tries to mix horror, gore, nudity, comedy & girls with large breast's which is fine I suppose but as a film it's just not very good & none of those elements are done justice.
Hazular ZZZ isn't the worst low budget movie ever made, by a long shot. But that doesn't mean it's good. There's plot holes galore, awful special effects, and a wooden plot line. And who knew blood could be bright pink? The actors, for the most part, actually seem quite competent, and do their best to make this movie entertaining- making the best of a bad situation, as it were. However, the characters have no depth, and as a viewer I didn't really care whether they lived or died. Or got eaten.Overall, I wouldn't recommend actively looking to watch this movie, but if it happens to be on, by all means watch it for a few laughs.