The Virgin Suicides

2000 "Beautiful, mysterious, haunting, invariably fatal. Just like life."
7.2| 1h37m| R| en| More Info
Released: 21 April 2000 Released
Producted By: American Zoetrope
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://www.paramountvantage.com/virginsuicides/html_3/
Synopsis

A group of male friends become obsessed with five mysterious sisters who are sheltered by their strict, religious parents.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

American Zoetrope

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Wordiezett So much average
Console best movie i've ever seen.
CommentsXp Best movie ever!
Mandeep Tyson The acting in this movie is really good.
jenaycarter Very sad film. I only wish that the girls would have seen that those boys were really good boys..in a way. But still I give this film a seven because it's just that sad of a film and its heartbreaking to see all five girls go through what they went through
keithbrown-90195 After 5 films now, it's clear that Sofia Coppola is a formalist first and foremost, but it's still a little alarming how thoroughly she was able to adapt the tone of the book's prose to the screen, especially as a first time director. The melancholy and mystery of Eugenides' words absolutely permeates every frame, complemented perfectly by the fantastic period detail: 1970s, suburban America, an idyllic homestead as any, filtered through a fever-dream haze. As per usual, the soundtrack choices are spot on. Filled with classics from the 60s and 70s, and a splash of modern and ethereal additions by Air; the music is essential, and expertly paired with the gorgeous images. I don't know if there's ever been a more fitting introduction to a character than Trip Fontaine walking down the halls of his school to the guitar wails of Heart's "Magic Man".I love how the narrator is never specified beyond being one of the boys. They, as a collective, share an experience, and then they share it with us. Even though we see more of them than their book counterparts (perhaps due to Coppola relating more with them than Eugenides did) the girls remain mysterious, elusive, and the boy's obsession with them is transferred to the audience. We watch and wonder, forming assumptions based on brief glimpses behind the curtain. Of course, we never come to understand them (because when have teenage boys understood girls?), but we make assumptions anyways because it's human nature. Surely the parents are at fault? But what about their peers? What about the media they consume? It's left deliberately vague and mysterious, and the desire to unravel and understand is certainly a reason for the continued relevance of both book and movie.While the book was languid, the mundane turned extraordinary through expertly designed sentences; I often overlooked the sharp, black humor in favor of the mysterious beauty. The movie, to my great delight, is full of tiny moments – often provided by the actors, professionals of the highest order – where the smallest gesture or a look can bring the largest laugh. James Woods in particular gives a fantastic performance, all awkward positioning and uncertain conversation.By the time the movie ends, it feels as if we've witnessed and experienced these events alongside our group of boys, the way that stories we've heard in our lives over and over seem to become our own memories. The aimlessness of the narrative feels like a group recollecting a series of events years later, unsure of the order in which the stories should be told. Like the character's memories, some stories linger in my mind, while others fade and are forgotten. Moments like dancing to "Come Sail Away" at the homecoming, or discovering the girl's bodies are forever burned into my cinematic mind. It's a pretty great achievement for Coppola and her team (and I think it's her warmest and prettiest looking movie too, credit to Edward Lachman where it's due).
Harry Waterman An extremely hard novel to adapt to the big screen, from one of my favourite novelists Jeffrey Euginides comes the directorial debut of Sofia Coppola who would go on to direct the award-laden Lost In Translation. Kirsten Dunst plays the role very well and the performances given from the parents of the five elusive Lisbon sisters, Kathleen Turner and James Woods were very impressive. The film cleverly mirrors the pungent adolescent anxieties and dark trails of obsession that are laced throughout the novel, however the film is less visceral and more Hollywood than would've been preferred, Sofia polished most of the feeling out of the film, however the story and style forgive all the film's flaws.
SnoopyStyle 25 years ago in an affluent Detroit suburb, math teacher Ronald Lisbon (James Woods) and his wife (Kathleen Turner) have five beautiful girls. The neighborhood boys led by Tim Winer are all fascinated by them. The youngest Cecilia (Hanna Hall) tries to kill herself. Psychiatrist Dr. Horniker (Danny DeVito) tells the strict parents to let the girls interact with boys. They throw a party for the girls but Cecilia throws herself out the window impaling on the iron fence spikes. Father Moody (Scott Glenn) tries to comfort the family. Cecilia haunts everybody. Lux Lisbon (Kirsten Dunst) is the most outgoing and catches the eye of hunky Trip Fontaine (Josh Hartnett). Lux and the sisters Mary (A.J. Cook), Therese (Leslie Hayman) and Bonnie (Chelse Swain) would always hang out together. After a night out, the girls are kept inside with little outside contact.Sofia Coppola brings a floating sad mysterious moodiness to the movie. She creates an unique dreamy vibe. The girls are fascinating but like the neighborhood boys, they remain a mystery throughout the movie to me. They feel like something imaginary that one can't get a hold of. That is very fascinating but after awhile, it's also very tiresome. We are forever outsiders looking in. I love the music, the mood and the style but I still want more.