The Tall Men

1955 "As Big and Spectacular and Exciting As The Mighty West Itself!"
6.7| 2h2m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 22 September 1955 Released
Producted By: 20th Century Fox
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Two brothers discharged from the Confederate Army join a businessman for a cattle drive from Texas to Montana where they run into raiding Jayhawkers, angry Sioux, rough terrain and bad weather.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Starz

Director

Producted By

20th Century Fox

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Bereamic Awesome Movie
Gurlyndrobb While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.
Guillelmina The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.
Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.
utgard14 Cattle-driving Clark Gable meets Jane Russell and sparks fly. But, almost right away, they break up. Why? Well turns out Gable wants to live a simple, quiet life on a ranch of his own. Jane's not happy about that. She wants more out of life than her parents had. Gable's got small dreams, Jane's got big dreams. I want to stop right here and ask for a pat on the back for saying Jane Russell's got big anything without going into the gutter. Anyway, after they break up Jane wastes no time going for ambitious businessman Robert Ryan.Good but not great CinemaScope western that really should be a classic considering the cast and director (Raoul Walsh). Overlength doesn't help. It certainly looks good. Some of the reviews I've read here are overly harsh, I think. Gable, Ryan, and Cameron Mitchell are all solid. Jane Russell is sexy (duh) and gets to sing a fun song full of double entendres. She has nice chemistry with Gable, who looks about ten years older than his actual age at the time. Gable and Russell fans will enjoy it.
Sean Morrow The first thing you notice is the stunning photography and use of the location. Does anyone do the wide screen better Raoul Walsh? I mean he practically invented it with "The Big Trail" back in 1930 with the 70mm Grandeur process. You feel like you're in for a real big screen treat, but then the story moves inside and the story get pretty pedestrian pretty quick. There is an interesting twist I won't spoil that leads to a cattle drive from Texas to Montana. I'm a sucker for a cattle drive and this one delivers big time.Just before the drive starts, as I watched the foreground action, I was thinking it didn't look like 5,000 cattle in the background. The foreground action was a little silly but it's Clark Gable and Robert Ryan so who can complain? Then Raoul Walsh starts putting it together close shot, long shot, cattle coming at you, cattle lumbering away from you, track shots, panning shots. These are not quick cuts trying to trick you into thinking you're seeing something you're not; these are slow cuts beautifully and artistically assembled to give you the breadth and scope required to understand what an undertaking this is going to be. Dozens of vaqueros, several supply wagons, a herd of extra horses, and all those long horn cattle! Really breath taking stuff. At several times I paused the film and every time it looks like a perfectly balanced painting of the old west was on screen.There's a silly romance and trumped up rivalry that doesn't interfere with the real story too much -- and after all, it's Gable and Ryan so it's not painful or embarrassing at all. There's a wonderful line by the Ryan character about the Gable character that goes, "He's what every boy thinks he's going to be when he grows up and wishes he had been when he's an old man." Ryan delivers with such an understated honesty that you truly believe his character would say it and about Gable it would be true.I highly recommend this movie and strongly urge you try to see the wide screen version. While you're being swept along by the story elements, give a thought to the master artist, Raoul Walsh. While singing the praises of John Ford, I always save a chorus for Walsh.
EdwardCarter Sadly what could have been a really great western is ruined by the slow pace and slack direction. It begins well, but after Gable and Jane Russell arrive at the barn in the snowstorm the film seems to stop, and after that it's overlong and boring all the way. At 54 Gable was at least twenty years older than the character he played, fortunately he still has enough charisma and screen presence to make up for this. Unfortunately though Jane Russell simply didn't have the talent for this part and Robert Ryan, usually a great actor, is rather wasted. The film is impressive for its epic scope and action scenes, although far too much of it is actually filmed in the studio.
weezeralfalfa Robert Ryan's character, Nathan Stark, is based upon a real person, Nelson Storey, who struck it rich near the boomtown of Virginia City, MT(renamed Mineral City in the film) and, in 1866, drove a herd of Texas Longhorns north from Texas to meet the pent up demand for beef among the gold miners. As in the film, he did encounter trouble from jayhawkers when he tried to drive his cattle through Kansas, he did have a major encounter with the Sioux in Wyoming, and the army did try to prevent him from proceeding further along the Bozeman Trail, because of Native American hostility. Part of this herd was used to establish a permanent herd in MT. The other aspects of this film are purely fictitious, if entertaining, and mostly involve the give and take between Jane Russell, Clark Gable and Robert Ryan. Of course, we can rightly assume that, in the end, Russell and Gable will end up together, although it doesn't look promising for most of the film.From my perspective, this film incorporates key elements from 3 previous films. As in "Call of the Wild", made 20 years before, Gable and companions rescue a beautiful woman in dire circumstances in a snowy wilderness(not once, but twice in the present film!) The woman eventually has to choose between Gable and another man. 5 years later, director Raoul Walsh directed a Civil War western "Dark Command". Quantrill's raiders, a quasi-military Confederate guerilla gang, were prominently featured in that film. In the present film, Gable, as Ben, and his brother, Clint(Cameron Mitchell) have recently quit Quantrill's raider's when they show up in Mineral City. In both films, the featured lady eventually has to choose between a poor but heroic cowboy or a sophisticated but overly ambitious rival, who throws money and promised status at her. The cowboy doesn't appear to have a ghost of a chance, but....Of course, there are some similarities with the previous "Red River". Both involve an epic cattle drive north out of Texas. Both involve occasional disputes among the leaders as to how to proceed or handle a dire situation at hand. However, there is no mutiny in "The Tall Men". Rather, the long drive sequence serves to better test the characters of the main protagonists and to give Russell more time to decide for sure who she wants to live with.(Both Gable and Ryan qualify as being "tall"). Russell's royal treatment on the trail by Stark reminds me of the spoiled tycoon in "Call of the Wild". Both merit their private bath tub on the trail!I thought Russell and Gable were generally excellent, with snappy dialogue and a good amount of sarcastic humor in their give and take. Russell certainly serves to lighten the tedium of the long cattle drive compared to the much more limited female presence in "Red River". She talks of her hard life growing up on a ranch(where?), but she also seems accustomed to fancy dresses and jewelry. What was she doing in the Wyoming winter wilderness, trying to get to CA? Who cares. Ryan, as Stark, was stiff and unemotional, with little sense of humor. I don't know if this is typical Ryan or an intentional characterization to make Gable's character look relatively more appealing to Russell. As was true of most of his films in his last 10 years, Gable's character was certainly meant for someone a good 20 years younger than Gable, who looked all of his 54 years. However, a weathered-looking Gable seemed better than no Gable.All-in-all, I found it an entertaining '50s western epic, shot in vivid CinemaScope. I don't agree with the scathing reviews of the times, nor with the common very unfavorable comparison with "Red River". The trail drive sequence was perhaps a bit long, but a lot shorter than the real 1500 mile drive! I liked Victor Young's background traveling music, played as the cattle were crossing that big river, for example. Yes, Ben was lucky in his occasional risky bravado episodes. but that's what you expect of Gable. The relationship between Stark and Ben and Clint was certainly unusual. The last 10 min. bring a few surprises in sorting out the final relationships between the principles, which have been simmering through most of the film....I didn't get around to discussing Ben's troubled, more trigger happy, brother. Remember that, as former members of Quantrill's raiders, the brothers were used to stealing, burning and killing. The James-Younger gang would emerge as the final incarnation of Quantrill's raiders.In an update, I recently became aware of two other excellent epic cattle drive films from this general era: "Cowboy", starring Glenn Ford and Jack Lemmon, and "The Texans", back in the '30s, starring Randolph Scott.