Cubussoli Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

SoTrumpBelieve Must See Movie...

GurlyIamBeach Instant Favorite.

CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

baileyagardner First time I saw I saw it, I didn't like it. The overuse of green screen, Link wearing WAY TOO MUCH makeup. But upon watching it the second time I was more optimistic. The Legend of Zelda Ocarina of Time on the N64 was the first game I ever played and loved.Though the effects were OK, I managed to make myself believe I was watching an 80's movie. The scene where they were fighting the separate monsters should've been longer. Not just highlights. They should have been like the dodongo fight scene.Those some acting is cheesy -especially Impa- this was a pretty alright movie. Though I would recommend Sage of Darkness, as it is the better one.

Christian Mortensen So, yeah, there is a movie about The legend of Zelda. Yep, that's right. It's a fan film created with almost no budget, so you gotta lower your expectations. I watched the whole movie, and i guess it was OK, but nothing more. The important thing is that they tried. The thing is - they struggle so hard just to follow the games storyline instead of taking the liberties to create their own story, which makes it boring and sometimes really annoying because the only thing Link seems to do is running around and doing what people tell him to do, like in the games. This is a sad fact, It could have been so much more. But it failed at the story, just because they tried so hard to stay true to the original game that the story just becomes lame and boring. And this is spoken by a true Zelda-fan, I know that it's hard to interpret the video game characters personalities (especially Link), the storyline etc but they could of at least twisted the story a little bit or make up their own story with elements from the game, like Sage of Darkness did. While it's not awful - it's not so good either. Awful camera angles (and the camera isn't of top notch quality either) that really annoyed me, average acting, they use way too much greenscreen and CGI effects which make the movie look fake and cheap, but the CGI is okay, since this is a budget fan film. I understand that Nintendo don't want to make a movie for a while, since so many awful Hollywood movies based on games are released more and more often. But god damnit, they did an average job. At least they tried, and i have full respect for that. So, is it worth watching? Well, if you got the time over and is a huge Zelda-fan, then it might be worth a watch. But if you're not really a hardcore zelda-fan i think you might want to skip this one, but hey, give it a try anyway. I would like to thank them for trying and for actually doing something instead of waiting on Nintendo releasing an actual movie. Do you remember last time Link spoke, in that god awful TV-series cartoon? You don't want anything like that to happen again, which i think is one of the main reasons Nintendo doesn't want to make a movie for now at least. Final vote: 5/10.

whittmarine 'The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time' is one of the best told stories ever to cross the gaming screen, so it's a vast disappointment to see that this movie is the exact opposite. I can give a list of all the problems this film has, but it would not fit in this review, so I'll keep it relatively short. Before I start, however, I want to assure you that I understand that it is a fan film and that the standards are much lower than that of a Hollywood film, but only in terms of budget and expenses. If the movie's story is horrid and terribly written, then it is solely its creators.The dilemma of this film can be summed up with three very generalized issues. The first being that the creators know 'what' elements make Zelda games work as well as they do, but they lack the understanding of 'why' these elements are there and 'how' they work. An example would be the Kokiri from the game. Link starts his journey from within the forbidden forest surrounded by kids to give him the sense of isolation. He has no fairy like the others, so he's not quite 'accepted', and he is the only one to question his existence, so none of them (save for Saria who is a sage) 'understand' him. In the movie, they keep the Kokiri, but they remove all sense of isolation. They attempt to make Link feel like he doesn't belong solely on the count that he isn't Kokiri, but since the Kokiri aren't all immature children, the attempt is boot. They all 'accept' and 'understand' him, and no attempt is made to show otherwise (like Mido in the game).The second issue is that they tell the story in such a way that the only way it can work is if the characters--Link, Zelda and Ganondorf-- are stupid. Ganondorf has been reduced to a Saturday morning cartoon version of himself (only slightly better than his representation in the old Zelda cartoon show) with the addition of a minion. Ganondorf has to give all his exposition to him and have the minion do all the work for him, which undermines his level of threat. He's probably the least screwed up of the three.Next is Zelda. Like in the game, her father, the king, does not believe her when she thinks that Ganondorf is evil. It's understandable why the king ignored her in the game since she was just a child and not very wise. It's NOT so understandable in the movie when she's an adult and already possesses the 'Triforce of Wisdom'. It also doesn't help that she hides from Ganondorf by staying right underneath his nose in the most conspicuous outfit imaginable (proven by the fact that she's caught by a guard the first time we see her after the time leap). It's worse that she fights quite decently on her own, a blatant attempt by the filmmakers to show that she is NOT a damsel-in-distress, only to have her captured in the end by a bunch of guards and turn her right back into one.Then there's Link. He's just written stupid. Despite the fact that the filmmakers decide to force an unnecessary romance sub-plot between Link and Zelda, the hero can't recognize his beloved in a disguise that barely covers her face (not to mention that her most prominent feature, her eyes, are the one part that isn't covered at all. You'd think he'd remember that part at least). Going back to the Kokiri Forest, they may have attempted to give him motivation, but it's immediately disregarded once he leaves, so he has no personality as well.The third and final issue is the overall flow of the film. Multiple problems sprout from this such as Link's swordsmanship swinging from 'I rule' to 'I suck' on a whim, the chaotic pacing, and most of all, the climax. To say that the climax is underwhelming is an understatement. What made the climaxes in the games work can be summed in one word: tension. Ocarina of Time showed great 'building' tension by having Link ascend the giant, windy staircase to meet with Ganondorf, 'character' tension by having these two characters confront each other multiple times in the past, and 'unknown' tension by having Ganondorf beat Link in the past so it's unknown whether or not Link is capable of succeeding in the end. This movie does not build, as Link immediately switches from fighting minions to Ganondorf in an instant, has no character, as Ganondorf has never met Link, and Link's only 'seen' Ganondorf once, and the unknown tension is given to a group of guards AFTER Ganondorf is defeated (the biggest treachery of all).Admittedly, I was somehow satisfied when I saw this film for the first time. It has constantly degenerated with each repeated viewing, but it leaves me to believe that there is an audience out there for it who are able to ignore all of these problems. However, that group is a vast minority.

slicknixon The Hero of Time is a fan-made film based on The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. If your first assumption about a film like this is that you must be a fan of the Zelda games to enjoy/appreciate it, then you would be correct. But you must also be the type of viewer who has already had the bar set low from previous expectations. What I mean is that if you've never seen a movie that seems like it was put together by a bunch of art school students and drama class non-actors, you will think it's garbage.With that being said, a TON of time and effort was clearly put into this thing. The special effects are good and the music is remarkable. George R. Powell spent over a year recording the 90+ min. score and it's truly amazing.The locations used for filming present a surprisingly decent fantasy world setting for Hyrule albeit some nit-picky things like the inclusion of "Give us this day our daily bread" on the Church/Cathredral in almost every shot of the temple. But overall, the setting is very good.The casting was a mixed bag and I'll get to the main problem in a little but first I'd like to award some praise to the guy who played Ganondorf. His facial structure was perfect for the part and his costuming (as well as the costumes for most of the other characters) were above average. Princess Zelda was pretty and not too shabby with the acting although some will/have disagreed on this. The tubby Asian guy as the Goron was just a terrible idea. As a matter of fact, this is one of quite a few things that really pull you out of the setting and into an art class screening of your friends who just made a movie. "LOL look at Harold, he's a big Goron with dirt on his face". The guy just doesn't care and it's obvious. They would have been better off just leaving the non human-like characters out of the movie.Now to the biggest thing pulling the movie down.. Link! David Blane's acting is terrible. His lines are terrible. His hair looks stupid. And the fact that he is also the producer really makes it seem obvious that he gave himself the leading role when quite a few of his friends playing the other characters probably would have been better suited. He just overall sucks, and makes the movie seem like much less than what it should be. EVERYBODY I know who has seen this agrees that he is the worst thing about the movie and since he's the main character and the hero we all played as and came to love in the games, its a major blow to the film's reception and overall reputation. Not to mention that makeup!Now for everything bad about this there is something surprisingly good and the overall plot and execution of the Ocarina of Time translation to live-action film is very admirable. More important to consider is the fact that so much went into this film and so little came out of it in the end, and I don't mean the movie itself. Not only was no money made, nobody really cared. This has been out for over a year and still has yet to receive 5 ratings on IMDb. Sure, the Zelda fan-sites reviewed it over the year's time, but even they were harshly critical. But the biggest kick in the teeth was from Nintendo themselves. They demanded that the film be taken off the internet completely despite the fact that is was being distributed for free and absolutely no profit was involved at all. I will have to admit that I lost quite a bit of respect for Nintendo because of this. Regardless, it's not hard to find if you look, and the people who really want to see it will probably find it if they search the internet good enough.In the end, it's all about appreciation and while it's an easy target for (severe) criticism, the fact that it exists at all is one thing. But the fact that we got a genuine epic that is almost 2 hours long and sincerely dedicated to something Zelda fans have grown to love over the years makes this film something special that I suspect will draw more attention in time. Until then, it's another one of those "underground of underground" type things that makes it all the more cooler to those of us who know about it and think it's pretty damn awesome.