The Good Fairy

1935
7.5| 1h38m| en| More Info
Released: 18 February 1935 Released
Producted By: Universal Pictures
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

In 1930s Budapest, naïve orphan Luisa Ginglebuscher becomes an usherette at the local movie house, determined to succeed in her first job by doing good deeds for others and maintaining her purity. Luisa's well-meaning lies get her caught between a lecherous businessman, Konrad, and a decent but confused doctor, Max Sporum. When Luisa convinces Konrad that she's married to Max, Konrad tries everything he can to get rid of the baffled doctor.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Universal Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.
Konterr Brilliant and touching
Sexyloutak Absolutely the worst movie.
Bumpy Chip It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.
Richard Chatten In her short life, the ethereally radiant Margaret Sullavan (1909-1960) did not last the night, but the lovely light she briefly gave is preserved for posterity in charming mementoes such as this. Deeply touching in drama, Sullavan's best remembered comedy role was in Ernst Lubitsch's evergreen 'The Shop Around the Corner' (1940), which was the second romantic comedy she made set in Budapest. 'The Good Fairy' was the first.Scripted by Preston Sturges from a play by Ferenc Molnár produced on Broadway in 1931, 'The Good Fairy' would have been a very different film indeed but for the introduction of the strict new Production Code of June 1934 just three months before shooting commenced. Sturges had to keep one step ahead of the film throughout production as he extensively rewrote the script, which has the Hays Office's fingerprints all over it; as well as a generally disjointed feeling - such as the early disappearance of Alan Hale from the narrative, never to return; and the late appearance of Herbert Marshall, never to leave - and a LOT of talk. The droll film-within-the-film which reduces Ms Sullavan to tears which was added to the script by Sturges is among a number of hints earlier on in the film that we were going to something sharper and more sophisticated than the bowdlerised romcom that we actually get. (The same plot played as drama might have made better use of Ms Sullavan's talents and made a more interesting film).Sullavan plays Luisa Ginglebusher, a charming, accident-prone orphan who is vastly more innocent and unworldly than the sweetly manipulative little vixen played on Broadway by Helen Hayes. Rather bizarrely plucked from the orphanage to become a cinema usherette - for which Luisa is kitted out in a magnificent uniform that looks more like one of Marlene Dietrich's cast-offs from 'The Scarlet Empress' - as Miss Ginglebusher ventures out into the big wicked city, one initially fears for the safety of this seeming cross between Prince Myshkin and a more garrulous version of Chauncey Gardner. But salvation is at hand in the form of Detlaff, a brusquely kind-hearted waiter played by Reginald Owen; who looks younger than I'm used to seeing him and gives the most engaging performance I've ever seen him give (he befriends her while cautiously removing her knife when she reveals to him during dinner that she was released from an asylum that morning, but quietly returns it when it turns out that the asylum was for orphans); and takes it upon himself to protect her from the wolves that prowl the city (an extremely wolfish-looking Cesar Romero puts in a brief appearance as one such).The film, unfortunately, soon tires of giving us a heroine who's just a simple working girl (we never actually see where she lives, for example), and is irrevocably derailed by the introduction of Frank Morgan as Konrad - one of those vague, benevolent millionaires encountered so often in Hollywood movies - who agrees to become Sullavan's sugar daddy without ever suggesting he might eventually be expecting some sugar in return. Ironically, considering he is today principally remembered for later playing the title role in 'The Wizard of Oz', Morgan actually describes himself at one point as "a wizard" and offers to demonstrate his magic powers to Luisa by pulling out his cheque book to enhance the life of the non-existent husband she has just made up to ward of his advances. I agree with 'kyrat', who said in an earlier IMDb review nearly fifteen years ago that it would have been more satisfying to have bestowed Konrad's windfall upon her own good fairy Detlaff rather than just pick a name out of the 'phone book; and the romance that develops between Luisa and the thus gifted Dr. Sporum (Herbert Marshall in a goatee and wing collar) - whose greatest excitement at his sudden good fortune is that he can now afford a proper office pencil-sharpener - seems dictated by Hollywood convention rather than any actual chemistry between them. (Surprise! Surprise! the film ends in a wedding; and I would have liked to have had a better look at the very striking wet-look art deco bridal gown we fleetingly see Ms Sullavan walk down the aisle in just before the end credits).As the film progresses Luisa frankly comes across as a bit of a simpleton rather than just a pure simple soul; and the 25 year-old Sullavan is playing a girl nearly ten years younger than her real age surrounded by middle-aged men whose motives all remain impeccably but rather improbably pure (there's some supposedly innocent but I thought slightly creepy horseplay in Konrad's hotel room with him pretending that he's a mountain lion and Luisa's a lamb). But this is all A-list Hollywood hokum done to a turn by rising young director William Wyler (who ran off with Sullavan to get married in the middle of production) and all very pleasant if you don't take it too seriously; which I'm sure nobody involved in the production did.
PWNYCNY Corny movie, dated, but cute, watchable but if you fall asleep don't be surprised. It is amazing how the name Preston Sturges sets up certain expectations for a movie, that it will be fast-paced and crammed with witty, funny dialogue, but alas reputation, like many other aspects of human life, may not be completely consistent with reality. This is a good movie but it is obscure and for good reason. The movie has an excellent cast but the movie's premise is so simplistic that it calls into question whether the audience in 1935 was so naive. This story presents a rather bizarre portrayal of life in an orphanage and the transition from ward to the government to independent woman. Also, the transplantation of Hollywoodish scenery and dialogue onto a story originally set in Hungary is a bit of a stretch but nevertheless it's a good movie. Herbert Marshall, Frank Morgan and Reginald Owen give excellent performances, which is further evidence that the quality of acting was far superior than what it is today, which isn't surprising given Hollywood's obsession for special effects with its firm reliance on the computer to rescue movies from total oblivion.
bottsford 'The Good Fairy' and 'Easy Living' (with Jean Arthur) are the two finest screenplays Preston Sturges wrote before he started directing his own work. Working from a Hungarian farce (a national flavor of playwriting that was the basis for many of Ernst Lubitsch's best movies), Sturges polished the plot and stuffed it with his inimitable comic dialogue. Directed with quiet confidence by William Wyler and cast with Margaret Sullavan (not the most sparkling comedienne, but perfectly capable) surrounded by top-notch actors, including Herbert Marshall (a superb and appallingly under-appreciated actor -- his effortless comic timing nails every line of this, "Trouble in Paradise", and "If You Could Only Cook") and Frank Morgan (best known as the Wizard of Oz, but also great in "The Shop Around the Corner"). All in all, a comic gem from the 1930s.
Neil Doyle Here's a film that did succeed as a charming comedy when it first opened at Radio City Music Hall back in 1935, based on a play by Molnar that had been a very successful stage comedy. And given the fact that MGM produced it with a handsome cast and gave it a director like William Wyler, it ought to be something to shout about.Not so. MARGARET SULLAVAN, first of all, is an acquired taste. She's not a conventional Hollywood face by any means--in fact, she's really a drab little wren--but with MGM's make-up department and some softly appealing close-ups, she makes a presentable leading lady. It's her voice and mannerisms that you have to get used to--much the way Katharine Hepburn took the country by storm and then was declared "box-office poison" when she became too mannered.The story is a trifle with a naive girl re-arranging the lives of three men she tries to help--but caught up in a web of deception. The well meaning girl has a waiter, a lawyer and a rich magnate all in a stew once she starts her fibs. This was re-made in the '40s as a Deanna Durbin film with music, of course, and maybe that's what helped I'LL BE YOURS become a more sprightly version of the tale.This is strictly for fans of Margaret Sullavan as the story and situations are a bit too contrived for comfort. HERBERT MARSHALL as the lawyer, REGINALD OWEN as the waiter and FRANK MORGAN as the millionaire all do well enough but no one can overcome the fanciful script that is more foolish than funny.