VividSimon Simply Perfect

Nessieldwi Very interesting film. Was caught on the premise when seeing the trailer but unsure as to what the outcome would be for the showing. As it turns out, it was a very good film.

Hayden Kane There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Tayyab Torres Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.

SnoopyStyle Directly after the end of the last movie, Lisbeth Salander is recovering from the gunshot wounds and facing trial from the earlier three murders. Her father Alexander Zalachenko is also recovering while her half-brother Niedermann is on the run. Mikael Blomkvist intends to expose everything while old men from the Swedish Security Service tries to silence the loose ends.The problem in this movie is that it's simply tying up loose ends. There are no more mystery or reveals left. Also Lisbeth is left on the sideline. First she's in the hospital, then she's in prison and finally she's in court. It's a lackluster wrap up of the trilogy without adding anything interesting. Also Mikael keeps saying that they're going to write the story about her. It seems like there is enough dirt to start writing. I don't really understand why they don't publish something. Again as with the second movie, Lisbeth and Mikael are kept apart for most of the movie. It is simply not as compelling as the earlier two films.

Armand final part of series, it is a basket with answers after the first parts questions. in same measure, it is a good political movie, far to classic recipes but really convincing to discover the novel. it is almost unrealistic in many scenes but it has the rare gift to seduce and to have the force to give inspired skin to a remarkable story. Noomi Rapace use each possibility of her role and the crisis of Millennium team is presented in inspired manner. in same measure, it is a film about Sweden system and that makes the difference by American crime genre. because, far to be only an adaptation, it represents a portrait of a country. and this fact is real significant - the rules, the democratic lines and limits, the role of silence and the justice , the force of civil society. a beautiful series. and , maybe, the most inspired form to adapted a success book.

Leofwine_draca I decided to go all-out and give myself the full Millennium experience by watching the TV miniseries (9 hours in total) over the space of three nights. As a result, these reviews are of the extended, three-hour editions of each film rather than the condensed, theatrical two-hour versions.Let's just say that THE GIRL WHO KICKED THE HORNET'S NEST doesn't disappoint. It finishes off the Millennium trilogy in an intelligent, emotionally satisfying way, drawing up all the themes and mysteries of the last two films. Great direction, great plotting, great acting, great cinematography...what's not to love?

scott-124 The Trilogy is certainly a must see tribute to Steig Larsson and the wonderful stories written before his untimely death in 2004. As in all cases it is nearly impossible to pull a storyline from the book but here they made a decent job of it.Sometimes I believe it is better to see the movie first because you are not disappointed by the film version. In the "Girl who..." Trilogy it is better to read the books first IMHO. The books pact so much more detail that you couldn't possibly bring to the movie. They tried to bring out as much as they could.In the end they did an excellent job in portraying Lisbeth. She is the focus in the books, the driving character needed to be highlighted. But read the books. They are highly entertaining, more so then the theatrical version. Mikael Blomkvist's character is certainly brushed over so quickly in the second two movies you barely get a feel for his motives.I won't spoil the movie here but IMHO I preferred the way they ended the story in the book. Maybe it wasn't obvious but it did click with my sentimental side.Tacka dig