SunnyHello Nice effects though.

Pacionsbo Absolutely Fantastic

CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

Forumrxes Yo, there's no way for me to review this film without saying, take your *insert ethnicity + "ass" here* to see this film,like now. You have to see it in order to know what you're really messing with.

csteidler Strangers of the Evening features switched corpses, an amnesia victim, estranged family members, and strange doings in the funeral parlor back room. It also contains a hard-to-follow plot involving too many characters, none of whom we get to know well. Even top-billed Zasu Pitts doesn't appear until about the halfway mark, and then in a role that is as minor—yet as important—as everyone else's. Overall, it's an uneven mix of oddities and clichés that leaves one off balance yet with a vague impression of having enjoyed it quite a lot.The dialog is certainly not the star of this picture. Whew! there is some silly stuff here. Take this exchange between Theodore von Eltz as young Dr. Everett and Miriam Seegar as Ruth, the daughter of a murder victim: Dr. Everette: "Please, dear." Ruth: "Oh, don't!" Everette: "Why, Ruth…you believe that I killed him?" Ruth: "Oh, I don't know what to believe." Everette: "Oh, Ruth, dear, you've got to have faith in me." Ruth: "Well, you quarreled." Everette: "But you can't believe that I did it! I don't know what happened, but you must trust me…." And so on.However, that blend of the predictable and the weird is somehow difficult to turn off. Von Eltz is actually quite good in his limited role. Lucien Littlefield is appropriately bizarre as "Snooky," as he's called by Zasu Pitts' Sybil, a sweet loony herself who found Snooky wandering in the street wearing only a raincoat and so took him home and fell in love with him.Zasu sums it up at the end about as well as anyone could: "Oh, Snooky!"

MartinHafer I honestly don't know if this was meant to be comedy. It did have plenty of goofy little moments, but considering that the film isn't the least bit funny, I have my doubts.This film begins with a man having an argument with a young lady's father. He wants to marry her, but her father is adamantly against it. You see them arguing and a few moments later, the father's body is found in the alley behind a mortuary. You assume the young man did this--and so do the police. Oddly, when the corpse is discovered, the bystanders drop it off at the funeral home and their reactions are very weird--not at all what you'd expect. In fact, many times throughout the film, weirdos (as well as corpses) appear and disappear regularly--but none of this is funny or helps much with the film--or has much to do with the mystery. This makes the film quirky--but not altogether satisfying. And, with this relatively dull script and most indifferent acting and directing, it's only a weak time-passer at best.

kidboots In 1932 this movie was called tasteless because it depicted some comical goings on at the morgue but now with films such as "Arsenic and Old Lace" and even "My Girl" it is now seen as quite restrained. For a Tiffany production, it not only boasted a book ("The Illustrious Corpse" ) by Tiffany Thayer, a popular novelist of the day ("Call Her Savage" and "Thirteen Women") but also an impeccable crew. Director H. Bruce Humberstone was given an early chance to make good and went on to have a great career ("Pin Up Girl" (1944), "Hello Frisco, Hello" (1945)). The cameraman Arthur Edeson had a list of credits that included "The Thief of Bagdad" (1924), "All Quiet on the Western Front" (1931), "Frankenstein" (1931), "The Old Dark House" (1932), "The Maltese Falcon" (1941) and "Casablanca" (1942).Funny things are happening down at the morgue - Dr. Everett (Theodore Von Eltz) has a laboratory there and is also planning to elope with Ruth (Miriam Seegar). Ruth's father, Frank Daniels (Lucian Littlefield) is not impressed and the last time Ruth sees him, he's having a "heated" discussion with Everett. The next day a corpse is bought in who is identified as Frank Daniels and the nation's police are on the look out for Everett and Ruth (who are on their honeymoon) and also Tommy, the young assistant undertaker who has taken fright and ran. Detective Brubacher (Eugene Palette) is finding the investigation tough when a wild eyed amnesiac, known as Richard Roe, wanders in and says that a murder has been committed. He was found wandering around in an overcoat and taken in at a boarding house run by Sybil (Zasu Pitts) - his odd behaviour excites police suspicion.I won't spoil the plot but certainly Theodore Von Eltz, whose forte was oily villains, must have confused audiences of the day with his portrayal of the hero. Zasu Pitts and Lucien Littlefield were the highlights, with their very distinctive humour, especially Pitts, with her fluttery mannerisms that convulsed audiences at the time - although Erich Von Stroheim called her the "ablest dramatic actress on the screen". Miriam Seegar, who at this writing is still with us, played Ruth. She was a beautiful ingenue who, unfortunately, didn't appear in any more films after the intriguing "False Faces", filmed the same year as "Strangers of the Evening". She married director Tim Whelan in 1932 and they spent most of the 30s in England, where he directed "The Mill on the Floss" (1937), "The Divorce of Lady X" (1938) and "The Thief of Bagdad" (1940).

adam_658 I suppose it goes without saying that 1930s America is a different culture than we live in today. The humor of this movie is incredibly foreign. For the entire movie I felt like the dumb blond who doesn't understand the jokes. The plot was complicated, but all and all pretty good. The acting is pretty decent. The fight scene is laughable, the one part of the movie where I think I understood the humor. The movie is set up as a mystery and in the good parts of the movie you wonder what's going on (in a suspenseful way.) And in the bad parts of the movie you wonder what's going on (in a confused way.) The ending does a fair job of cleaning up the confusion. If one's a fan of slap-stick comedy I would say this is probably a classic, but even as one who just don't get it I can say "Strangers of the Evening" tells a good enough story to earn a 6.