Limerculer A waste of 90 minutes of my life

Odelecol Pretty good movie overall. First half was nothing special but it got better as it went along.

Kidskycom It's funny watching the elements come together in this complicated scam. On one hand, the set-up isn't quite as complex as it seems, but there's an easy sense of fun in every exchange.

Dynamixor The performances transcend the film's tropes, grounding it in characters that feel more complete than this subgenre often produces.

vincentlynch-moonoi Frank Sinatra eventually became a fine actor. Eventually.MGM made great musicals. This film was produced by RKO.In sum, this is a light weight musical with a light weight plot and light weight acting. It's not just a gas, it's helium.In all fairness to Sinatra, this was only his second film appearance, and surprisingly the film following this one was "Anchors Aweigh" in which he did very nicely. But, that latter film was an MGM production. It makes a difference.I was not impressed at all with the songs here, although they were composed by Sammy Cahn and Jule Styne.The cast here does "okay". Just "okay". George Murphy, who I have seen in other films and who can be quite engaging, should have protested his role here; about all he does is yell and scheme; an embarrassment. Adolphe Menjou is a bit entertaining blowing his top. Gloria DeHaven does alright musically and acting, but it's clear why she never became top shelf. Walter Slezak was not even particularly funny here as the hotel manager. Eugene Palette is always entertaining.Frankly, to like this film one would have to be a super fan of Frank Sinatra.

writers_reign As a lifelong Sinatra fan who has seen all the movies and owns all the CDs I have no hesitation in rating this the best film he made in the 40s, his best in fact until Meet Danny Wilson right at the start of the 50s. In fact it's right up there with the two great musicals he made in the 50s, Young At Heart and High Society and it's no coincidence that all three had rock-solid scripts, had in fact begun life in each case as non-musical dramas/comedies. Young At Heart was a successful novel by Fanny Hurst which became a fine drama, Four Daughters; High Society was a play, The Philadelphia Story, tailored especially for Katherine Hepburn who played it both on Broadway and the subsequent film version and Step Lively began as a farce on Broadway and became a film vehicle for the Marx Brothers. This means that Sinatra isn't asked to carry the film and we can enjoy George Murphy as a sort of pre-Bilko complete with two sidekicks, Wally Brown and Alan Carny, in a running battle with Walter Slezak, Adolph Menjou and Eugene Palette. The six great songs provided by Jule Syne and Sammy Cahn are a bonus even those in which Sinatra does not feature (Ask The Madam). Sinatra is allowed to develop his personality into something - albeit only a little - more than the gauche 'himself' he played in Higher And Higher and once he got to MGM he was back to gauche. I suspect that Anchors Aweigh would seem very dated today despite a fine score, The Kissing Bandit was always a joke with Take Me Out To The Ballgame only a notch better and I've always found On The Town vastly overrated which leaves It Happened In Brooklyn as the best of a mediocre lot. Step Lively - seen today, May, 2008, retains its freshness and failed completely to disappoint.

bkoganbing Step Lively is simply Room Service with a musical score by Jule Styne and Sammy Cahn. It was Frank Sinatra's second feature film role and it marked the first time he worked with that team of songwriters. There would be others, especially with Cahn who has the distinction of putting more words in Frank Sinatra's mouth than any other lyricist.The original Room Service took place in the hotel suite of Gordon Miller, fast talking producer/conman and was originated by Sam Levene on stage and Groucho Marx on screen. George Murphy is certainly a lighter, gentler version of both of them. But he's passable enough in the part because we wouldn't want too much attention taken from Frank Sinatra.Sinatra's role as the naive singer/playwright from Oswego was built up considerably from the original play. It was because of him that this film version was taken out of the one room setting of the original. His role was first played by Eddie Albert on Broadway and Frank Albertson with the Marx Brothers. One song stands out in the score, As Long As There's Music which Sinatra really aces. Yet while Step Lively was being filmed at RKO and while it was out the recording industry was being struck by the musicians union. Additionally shellac which was needed to make those 78 RPMS was in short supply because of World War II. Sinatra never recorded the songs from Step Lively even after the strike was over. Yet As Long AS There's Music still became a hit. I have a version by Eddie Fisher on one of my record albums. Yet it's never identified with Sinatra.Playing the roles that Chico and Harpo did are the comedy team of Wally Brown and Alan Carney, RKO's attempted answer to Abbott and Costello. RKO also got Adolphe Menjou and Walter Slezak to play the exasperated hotel managers and Eugene Palette had a memorable bit as the representative of Murphy's secret show backer who wants discretion in all things.The female roles are from a pair of lovely RKO starlets who had substantial careers, Gloria DeHaven and Anne Jeffreys. So you can't say they didn't do all right by Old Blue Eyes.On the strength of this film which did very well at the box office, MGM bought half of Sinatra's contract from RKO and he went on to make some great musicals in the Forties with them. But that's coming very soon.Step Lively is both funny and contains some great singing by The Voice.

MartinHafer This film is at times an exact copy of the Marx Brothers film, ROOM SERVICE. Instead of the Marxes, Frank Sinatra and his pals reprise the exact same roles. The first versions of most movies are usually the best, and this could certainly be said of this film. Think about what a tough road this movie had--no Marx Brothers and yet it was to somehow say something unique and worth watching. Well, it didn't. While it is certainly a time-passer and worth watching from a historical point of view, I see no reason for the average viewer to do so. The songs that were added to the flick weren't particularly wonderful and the movie is nothing new. Just see the original film and be done with it!