Star Trek Beyond

2016 "The final frontier...and beyond."
7| 2h2m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 22 July 2016 Released
Producted By: Paramount
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: https://www.paramountmovies.com/movies/star-trek-beyond
Synopsis

The USS Enterprise crew explores the furthest reaches of uncharted space, where they encounter a mysterious new enemy who puts them and everything the Federation stands for to the test.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Paramount

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Claysaba Excellent, Without a doubt!!
Sameeha Pugh It is encouraging that the film ends so strongly.Otherwise, it wouldn't have been a particularly memorable film
Lucia Ayala It's simply great fun, a winsome film and an occasionally over-the-top luxury fantasy that never flags.
Darin One of the film's great tricks is that, for a time, you think it will go down a rabbit hole of unrealistic glorification.
Ivan-Donalds (daohoiep) And then it was a fail so they gave him Star Trek. It is a fail and boring nonsense with explosions that do not kill anybody important and so they kicked him out... nah... they gave him Star Wars. Next they will give him another 50 remakes or whatever. Anyway, this Star trek is boring and if you were looking for the old TV serial quality forget it
nickboldrini I first reviewed this as a 6. But now on second watch I am giving it an 8. I am not sure why the difference. Except. I am watching this at home a bit drunk on a small screen. And I wonder if the central idea of this film, of being part of a crew, got lost in the big screen spectacle viewing of this first time around. This is an action packed Star Trek film, but it still has the heart of Star Trek - an ensemble piece, where the core crew are ALL heroes, and each play their part to solve the crisis. In this film they all do, and I liked it better second time around, because I think I picked up on that idea, rather than being sucked along on the roller coaster (though I still was). But a big screen overwhelms you with SFX, and spinning cameras ( a key motif of this director). A small screen, shows the core and the flaws, in greater detail, in some ways, because they are not hidden by the spectacle. And I think thats why I liked this more second time round. The heart showed through better.
drewstewartcola As many poor reviews as I've seen on this site and others, it's clear this film is far more for a newer younger audience, meaning viewers, who weren't old enough to the franchises from the mid 90's. As I've noticed over the years with the newer Star Wars movies beginning with The Force Awakens. Fans simply don't like change or evolution older characters. Abrams has Taken Star Trek in a direction which appeals to younger viewers and not the Trekkers who were around for TNG and the other shows. He's had to make them full of action and violence so the film will bring in more money on opening weekend. Not saying I'm a fan, but we have to face reality and concede, this ain't Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek.
garth-mailman The original Star Trek was a 3-year TV Series. These big budget extravaganzas cost hundreds of millions as evidenced by the 5 movie studio's logos we have to sit through before the actual movie starts. Most of the action does not take place on the Enterprise the crew's penchant for destroying trillion dollar vessels seeming to continue as does Scotty's ability to get ancient relics back into space. Simon Pegg who plays Montgomery Scott had a hand in writing this one. Kirk, Bones and Spock are the essential trio and we learn of the death of Nimoy both in the script and in a memorial in the credits which also mention Anton on a first name basis only. The ability to survive space exploration does not extend to surviving old age or wonky earth technology. As the saying goes it blows up real good and in the movies sound still manages to travel through space.