Wordiezett So much average

ShangLuda Admirable film.

Humaira Grant It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

Erica Derrick By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.

dougdoepke Gene delivers horses to a diamond mine in, where else, but darkest Africa.The only thing I can figure is that some careless studio secretary got the pages of an Autry western mixed up with a Tarzan script. How else to explain the lunacy of our cowboy heroes meeting up with an "ooga-booga" tribe of witch-doctors in darkest Africa. Somehow, it's weirdly entertaining since you don't know what sort of craziness comes next—gorillas, lions, or flame- throwers. There're a number of good bits even if the premise is wacko— some tuneful songs, the charming Cabin Kids, plus Burnette and Hodgins doing their amusing bits, including a crash-bang finale. I'm just wondering how many ticket-buyers in 1936 left the theater wondering if their maps had gotten Texas all wrong. Oh well, like the movie or not, it sure isn't your typical matinée fare.

MartinHafer Despite the title, almost none of the film is set in Texas! Now here is where the film gets REALLY weird--it's supposed to take place in South Africa! Yes, Gene Autry, his horse Champion and his faithful sidekick Smiley Burnett in South Africa! And, the overall product looks a lot like a B-western merged with a Tarzan flick! Talk about strange! The film begins back in the States. Gene receives a letter from his brother* saying that they really need livestock in South Africa and they can get top dollar for them. So, he and Smiley head across the ocean. However, when they arrive they can't find the brother--he has disappeared after some evil claim-jumpers killed his partner and did goodness knows with him. So, in the process of investigating the disappearance, the baddies try to stop him--leading, naturally, to the somewhat exciting conclusion.Seeing Gene on his horse chasing baddies and then a moment later rushing about a thick jungle set is surreal to say the least. And, seeing Smiley doing fire-eating tricks as well as leading musical group supposedly made up of the Chief's kids really gave this movie a strangeness that made my brain hurt. Still, it was fun and kept my attention and is worth seeing if you like Gene Autry films. Others, however, might not be very impressed or be a bit offended by the stereotypical behaviors of the 'natives' or the use of the 'K-word' (I don't think IMDb would let me use this derogatory word for African Blacks--but to many it's about as offensive as the 'ol 'N-word' in the USA. And, I have been to South Africa and this sure looked NOTHING like the real McCoy--more like extras and props from a Tarzan picture!FYI--The guy playing Gene's brother was NOT his actual real-life brother--just some actor.

classicsoncall What!?!? - Gene Autry has a brother!?!? - and the story takes place in Africa!!!! Wow, if there's a dumber Autry flick I've yet to see it, and I've reviewed sixty two of them here on the IMDb so far. Don't get me wrong, I'm as solid an Autry fan as the next guy, but this one didn't make sense on so many levels that you're probably going to love it.The first thing that blew me away was the mere idea that Gene gets a letter from his brother Tex (Ken Cooper) in South Afrioa asking him to bring over fifty horses to work his diamond mine, and Gene just gets up and does it - like he's got nothing better to do! Then, once Gene and partner Smiley Burnette hit the town of Dunbar, it looks just like any other Western movie town of the late 1800's, complete with a Western saloon and cowboys in full gear. At least director Joseph Kane had the good sense to hang a pair of antelope horns on the wall instead of a steer.From there the story just zig-zags it's way through a number of zany predicaments that involve Gene and Smiley attacked by a lion, getting arrested for engaging in illicit diamond trade, and escaping on horseback using the old rope across the trail trick. Hey if it works in Texas, why not here? You know, as soon as that big ape showed up I just knew it was Ray 'Crash' Corrigan up to his old monkey-shines again. If you needed a guy with a gorilla suit back in the Thirties and Forties, Corrigan was the guy you called. Don't believe me? Check any mystery or horror flick of the era involving gorillas and you'll find his name attached to the project.Well I don't know that this story made any sense or not, so don't watch watch it through the same lens you'd use on your average B Western. Sure, bad guy Cardigan (LeRoy Mason) gets nailed for setting up Gene's brother for murder, but that's about the only genre standard that this one follows. The stereotypes used to portray the jungle natives are typical for the era, which is to say they'd never pass the PC police today. Even the musical selections stray from the norm, with pretty Maxine Doyle offering up a lively drinking song and a chorus of black youngsters, The Cabin Kids, sounding rather good on a revival song with Smiley in the lead. As for the picture's title, it has no bearing on the story at all, but who'd go see a film called 'Round-Up Time in South Africa'?

rbzm45 contrary to another comment that they must have used a set built for a jungle film---it was actually the Republic Studios back lot western set that was used for this film. as well as the back lot jungle area already there at the time. The western set was used as a number of other locations over the year also. The Spanish arches seen in the film were at the Mexican village part of the set and used over the years as a fort, a North African village, etc; all they do is shoot from different camera angles and place the appropriate foliage and decorations here and there, and voilà!!! They can be anywhere. the western street was strange in the movie as South Africa, it having been used numerous times in movies and TV westerns. The republic studios back lot was part of the CBS Studio Center beginning in the mid 60's or so and even Gunsmoke used that set a number of times.