Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

filippaberry84 I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Ginger Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

Candida It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.

grinmichigan At the end you miss the point at the end. There is no explanation for the police commissioners action. It was stated in another review that this scene was cut, then you wonder what other stupid cuts were made. The main character did give up and come out so why was he shot? Also it was not explained why the wife left the husband with her children when it appeared the father was doing all the right things and being honorable. Why did she leave him? With the end just ending and missing these appears to me just to make no sense and the two plus hours was a waste of time to me. There are many characters in this film and they do not directly tie in so it is hard to keep track of why they are there.

smatysia I haven't read the novel this film was based on. But I understand it had myriad plot lines snaking throughout the narrative. The director, Milos Forman, apparently chose the Coalhouse Walker story line to hang this movie on. It is about racial injustice, and a revolutionary response to it. OK, I understand that racial injustice is a big part of the American story. I'm not saying that it should be swept under the rug, or that the story shouldn't be told. But if I need to be preached at about racial injustice, I could just go rent a copy of To Kill a Mockingbird. Aside from this, the film is well done, with excellent acting, good photography, high-quality production values. I guess there was only so much screen time available, but some of the other plot lines got seriously short shrift here, and I think the movie suffers for it.

bkoganbing Back in the day when Hollywood was grinding out B westerns it wasn't unusual at all to see famous folks of the west in stories that had absolutely nothing to do with their own lives or to see many famous people interacting when they never even met in real life.Ragtime revives some of that dubious tradition in filming E.L. Doctorow's novel about the Teddy Roosevelt years of the first decade of the last century. Teddy figures into this briefly as does his Vice President Charles Fairbanks. Booker T. Washington is here too, as are the principals of the Stanford White murder, and New York City Police Commissioner Rhinelander Waldo.It's quite a blend because Roosevelt and Fairbanks ran for re-election in 1904 as Fairbanks is shown delivering a campaign speech. He wasn't even Vice President then, just a Senator from Indiana. Fairbanks was running for Vice President because Roosevelt had no Vice President in his first term. He succeeded to the presidency when Willima McKinley was assassinated.The Stanford White murder took place in 1906 and was then called the crime of the century. Many such murders right up to O.J. Simpson were given that dubious distinction. And Rhinelander Waldo was not NYPD Police Commissioner until 1910 and he was much younger than James Cagney. Still and all E.L. Doctorow's book is made into a fine film which got a whole bunch of Academy Award nominations including Best Picture, Best Director for Milos Forman and Supporting player nominations for Howard Rollins, Jr. and Elizabeth McGovern.The main story is about Coalhouse Walker, Jr. a black ragtime pianist and his Sarah. She has his baby and they'd like to get married. But a whole lot of things, some of them peripherally connected to the true events and people previously mentioned that lead him and a gang to take possession of the Morgan Library and threaten to blow it up.Howard Rollins was a real tragedy. This was a great start to a short, but brilliant career that included his long running role as Virgil Tibbs in the TV series In the Heat of the Night and the film A Soldier's Story. He died way too young from AIDS contracted from a lot of intravenous drug use. Elizabeth McGovern is the famous Evelyn Nisbet, the girl on the red velvet swing which was the title of another film that dealt with the Stanford White murder. McGovern's performance is probably closer to the real Evelyn than Joan Collins was in that earlier film. She's basically a goldigger who juggled two men, her husband Harry K. Thaw and her upscale lover, society architect Stanford White. Her circus act led to White's death, Thaw's commitment to an insane asylum and a vaudeville career for her.Ragtime was eagerly awaited because of the anticipated return of James Cagney to the screen after being off for 19 years. Cagney is clearly aged, but he gets through the role because unlike that television film Terrible Joe Moran, he's not the center of the film, though he's first billed. Note that he's sitting down during most of his performance and when he has to stand the camera is a discreet distance. It's nothing like the bouncing Cagney of old, but light years better than Terrible Joe Moran.This was also the final joint appearance as it turned for the team that invented the buddy film, James Cagney and Pat O'Brien even though they have no scenes together. O'Brien is Harry K. Thaw's attorney and Mrs. O'Brien plays Thaw's mother under her maiden name of Eloise Taylor. She was an actress before she married Pat, but gave up her career to raise their four children. Author Norman Mailer plays Stanford White, fulltime architect and hedonist and Robert Joy plays the demented millionaire Harry K. Thaw and both fit the parts perfectly. Maybe one day we will have a definitive film version just concentrating on the murder and it's aftermath for the three principals.Milos Forman gave us a remarkable evocation of an exciting time in American history. It seemed that America had limitless possibilities then. I doubt they'll be saying that about the first decade of this century.

sharonfeagan Should have PG13 rating instead of PG. Was watching with a 11 year old. Did not know of the nude scene. Did not appreciate this. Would be nice if you let us know with the 13 rating. It is very important that as the movie industry your try to help us do the right thing when there are children involved. We are doing our best to raise good kids. Help us by at least using the Pg13 rating correctly. I know you think nudity is cool. I know you think it sells Movies. For some of us we would like to watcha movie with our children and not be embarrassed.Apparently you can't count either. Do you not want to submit this because it is negative.