Karry Best movie of this year hands down!

Steineded How sad is this?

Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

Lela The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.

richardlamond79 I didn't have high expectations going into this one: Rubbish B-movie title, the poor man's Bruce Willis style lead actor, the dodgy effects but that could have been part of the charm of it. I love B-movies. I really do. Sometimes the story (and particularly with sci-fi) is good enough to redeem matters. But not here.Some of the acting is truly dreadful - the lead male is painfully average but with the notable exception of Alexis Thorpe, still manages to turn in the best performance...Mr Valentine's demise is, as others have already said, unintentionally hilarious and is the only reason I can muster up to watch any of this dross ever again.The plot is a lame Matrix rip-off with nothing even remotely original about it. A particular highlight is the scene where Kyla is put in a prison cell and promptly escapes within 20 seconds making the whole sequence completely redundant.And that's pretty much it really... avoid.

disgras This movie sucks but Alexis Thorpe is gorgeous! Why the world turned to be that way is not clearly explained and I don't understand how mass mind control could be achieved (they have to catch every citizens and implant chips in their brain?) The sci-fi basis is weak. Imagine in medieval times, a group of rebels led by a woman tried to rise up against tyrannical rule and somehow a brave knight (our hero is an employed cop now) joined them. It makes no difference except laser guns are used in this movie. Not every successful sci-fi movie relies on cheap visual effects but most importantly, the plot must make sense and illuminate our vision of future. Some hollow and meaningless conversions are particularly turn-off in this one. However, it's a pleasure to see Alexis Thorpe controls machines with her pretty eyes.

charlesdias This movie has all characteristics to be one of the mos awful movies of the year. It's a mix of superficial story with poor dramatization, far than poor sets and cheap CGI (computer generated images).I choose to watch it because the poster I saw on a website but I needed just three minutes to realize it was a waste of time I just accepted to go on with because it was a lazy rainy Sunday night.I'm really curious to know why people design, work on and put on the market such crap movies like this one. I barely believe it's minimum profitable. Perhaps it's a way to get some business tax reduction by "supporting culture financing movies production"./ Anyway, just think about watching it in a lazy rainy Sunday with no other good movie aveible for watching.

skylerh This has got to be one of the most disappointing films of recent memory. And I just got finished watching License to Wed. The basic notion is intriguing enough: people live in a dystopic future but the "Man" keeps it hidden from them using computer chips implanted in their brains. Our hero is a stand-up, police-officer kind of guy who, for fairly unclear reasons, decides to join a rag-tag group of rebels (by group I mean one or two) dedicated to showing the world the truth. But this didn't even rise to the level of a Sci-Fi channel original movie, but was slightly better than that one zombie movie made by those kids in their trailer park one weekend... and Transmorphers. The acting was as good as could be expected, given the wooden dialogue, bad direction and snails-pace editing. No, that's not true. The acting was also pretty bad. The music sounded like something out of a mid-80's video game. This was more like someone's proof of concept of a movie than the actual movie itself. If I had a chip implanted in my brain I'd program it to make myself remember doing something slightly enjoyable for the last hour and a half of my life. Avoid at all costs.