Jeanskynebu the audience applauded

Micitype Pretty Good

Tayyab Torres Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.

Kirandeep Yoder The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Diane Ruth This is the most inspired of the Feast Trilogy films and the best work so far from director John Culager. Once again the blood and gore are somewhat overwhelming yet these elements are essential to the realization of Culager's creative vision and never simply gratuitous. There are some quite shocking sequences during which the intensity of the action becomes virtually unendurable. Some may turn away in search of relief but that denies the audience member of some of the most haunting imagery in cinema history. The cast is uniformly excellent with the director's father, Clu Culager, giving a superb performance in one of his greatest roles. The shattering climax is simply breathtaking and the long closing scene is a powerful artistic choice that audiences will never forget.

bowmanblue If you like cheesy (and gory) horror then you'll probably have seen the original 'Feast' film. It was nice and compact, with plenty of claret spewing all over the place, not to mention a few surprising moments which deliberately defied convention. Then came the second chapter, which did its best to 'up the ante' and be more outrageous and generally more violent. It succeeded, but somehow it lost all its charm.'Part III' was made back to back with Part II and therefore feels exactly like the second half. Sadly, although it too contains extreme violence and black humour, it doesn't compare to the original. Just like Part II, the characters are unlikeable, the monsters look like big men in rubber suits and the story sort of ambles from set-piece to set-piece.When I'm the mood for a story like 'Feast' I'll watch all three. Parts II and III have their moments, but the original was best and always will be. If you're just a casual horror fan, stick with the first one and avoid the second pair.http://thewrongtreemoviereviews.blogspot.co.uk/

BA_Harrison Ask the best chefs in the world and they will say that 'presentation is everything'; it's an old adage that I really wish director John Gulager had applied when serving up The Happy Finish, the final chapter in his Feast trilogy. Style and attention to detail are in short order, the film being dished up with all the finesse of a pig farmer with a slop bucket; if it was the third course in a meal, it would result in a severe case of indigestion.Like Beluga caviar, Marmite and Spam, the film's main ingredients—extreme gore, female nudity, offensive humour, rubbery monsters, and random perversion—are an acquired taste, but Gulager's scatter-shot approach results in a chaotic mess that even seasoned fans of trashy horror will be hard pushed to stomach. There are one or two tasty morsels on offer—some decent effects and a couple of genuinely funny gags—but these are completely smothered by the irritating editing, half-baked ideas, unlikable characters, moronic moments, and truly bizarre directorial choices (an entire scene lit by a strobe?!?!) all of which serve to kill the appetite quicker than a short, curly hair in your mashed potato.

dbborroughs Third film in the series starts a few minutes before the end of the second and deals with the survivors of the monster invasion of a small town trying to get to safety. Its a bleak black gory occasionally humorous film that is better than the second one but not as good as the first. Plot wise there isn't much to say beyond that. What I can say is that some of the madness of the first film returns. The on-screen description of everyone and their chances is back, as is a tighter reign on the on screen happenings. I don't think the film makes any more sense than the second, but at least the film doesn't get lost in long sequences that go on for no good reason. Since seeing it last night I'm wondering if this is better served by just jumping from the first film and letting your mind fill in all of the blanks. I don't know. I know if this and the second film had been cut together they might have made one really good film instead of two just okay ones. I do like the very end song which is wonderfully bizarre in a good way. Worth a look if you saw the first one and don't mind tasteless blood and guts.