Evengyny Thanks for the memories!

Sexyloutak Absolutely the worst movie.

Kaelan Mccaffrey Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

dontspammyjunk This film was one of the worst I have ever seen. Felt like a made for TV low budget poorly acted film. Honestly I kept watching it because it was like a train wreck. It was like they had gone to a film school and said, now we have a really poor idea for a film, do you want to act in it for free and make a film so terrible you will be embarrassed to put it on your cv, and they all said yes. I would be beyond mortified if I had been a part of that film. Worst of all is that you never find out how/why the stalker started stalking her in the first place. Truly truly terrible. Not even sure what to write now to fill in how much I didn't like this film. For me it was right down there with Blair Witch Project.

blingatme This is a terrible movie. I watch a lot of movies and this one has no real life base.It's one thing to try and scare people into being careful, but it's another to totally shield the audience from reality.The cinematography is totally horrible. I am still not sure what Lifetime Channel had hoped to achieve form this movie.Even the leading actress is working half way - - at no point do we see her authentic self.Was it the company? The production? or the writers?I have no clue. But I feel like I want my dollar back from red-box (it was that bad).

diddleysquat-1 (I'm not sure this is a spoiler but don't want to take chances.)***************Nothing in this movie makes sense. The stalker breaks in by decoding the burglar alarm, lies down in the girl's bed, drops a cell phone that somehow clues the parents (with a few numbers) that the alarm system has been breached. He then emerges to kill the girl's parents and in a flash he's gone.Next we go to a scene 13 years later where a detective is still struggling to solve what would have been a very cold case. And the home invader, well, he's still at it.Did the script writer expect us to believe that a cell phone app could turn a series of deadbolt locks at the apartment of a tech-phobe who wouldn't get near anything related to electronics? Yes, we're talking plain old brass deadbolt locks. Step right up suckers. See him turn them from the outside using a cell phone! And, yes, he manages murder the woman's only friend (her therapist) by messing with the walk light at a busy intersection. Another cell phone app, it seems. You'd think the lead character would have reacted with some sadness. Well, don't expect logic here.It took at least a month to film this piece of pure rubbish. How do I know? The lead actress's hair is blonde to the roots in some scenes and has a one-centimeter outgrowth of untreated hair in others. That takes a month.A budget of under $2 million is low for movies, I know. But it should be enough for an $8 bottle of hair dye. Never mind. Not worth it.Worst TV movie I've seen outside the intentionally-bad SciFi channel stuff. Ghastly awful.

Val Ensia Based (or maybe inspired by is more appropriate) on a true story, Cyberstalker puts a modern spin on a traditional Fatal Attraction type story as we find a man obsessed using the internet and technology to stalk, harass, and ultimately kill Mischa Barton's character Aidan.To me, it was reminiscent of Untraceable with Diane Lane but on a smaller scale. Surely shot in Canada, Cyberstalker has its ups and downs and a few good twists. Notable standout performance are put in by Marco Grazzini and Mark Caven.It was better than I expected it to be and is worth the watch if you like TV thrillers or mysteries.