Bonnie & Clyde: Justified

2013 "They kill for the thrill!"
3.5| 1h30m| PG-13| en| More Info
Released: 05 November 2013 Released
Producted By: Lions Gate Films
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

In Depression-era America, Bonnie Parker met Clyde Barrow over a cup of hot chocolate, and it was love at first sight. Their violent courtship took them through bank robberies, prison and a multi-state crime spree, securing their place in history as one of America's most notorious couples

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Lions Gate Films

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!
Salubfoto It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.
Keeley Coleman The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;
Kinley This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows
Michael Ledo This is a low budget drama that centers around Bonnie Parker (Ashley Hayes). It starts with her first failed marriage and her love for "bad boys." There is significant first person narration from Bonnie as she reads poetry from her diary. Eric Roberts appears as the sheriff who killed the couple. While his role was brief, the film capitalized on it by showing the clip at the beginning and the end. Plot Spoiler: They die.The film is exceedingly low budget. It does not show any robberies, just headlines. In fact the money they show is only a partial view of the corners. The one 50 dollar bill corner has a huge 50 and is clearly a modern bill. Gun fire and bullets hitting the vehicle are CG. The acting is fairly sad too.A more entertaining film (slightly less accurate) would be "Bonnie and Clyde vs. Dracula."Parental Guide: No f-bombs, sex, or nudity. Dressed couple in bed morning after.Some sexual innuendos such as the postman "delivering big packages in the rear."
Garrett F. I had to laugh when I watched this, and in fact I did. The part at approx. 75:45 made me laugh the most. It looked like one of the show's producers Photoshopped the building (penitentary or castle?) into the scene. I also love the fake-looking flashes they too edited in.Also, I believe Clyde always drove Ford's. Don't quote me on that, but I think that is how it was. The Roadster they were in in the beginning I don't believe was a Ford. Also, I believe the real B&C stole many cars, in the movie they only had two cars.I also have to make note how half the movie is black and white movies. All the scenes were in the same dessert, including the "Indiana" scene. I just wonder where that $1,000,000 they had went.All in all: the A&E version was 10 times better. I've never seen the 1967 version so I can't compare it with that one, but I'm sure the 1967 one was the best out of all of them.Would I recommend this movie? Hill no! If you can, watch the 1967 version, or at least the A&E version, which I will also review.
beirutvet Not since Pippi Longstockings have a sat through a more dreadful movie. HORRID. Sad because the two lead actors have potential to do some very good work. I've seen high school plays in rural North Dakota that had more of a budget than this movie. The same quarter mile stretch of road used over and over again from different angles. Prop guns were horrible, you could see the plugs in the barrels half the time, the other half of the time they were so clearly stage props they looked like they were stolen from a college theater department. The "special effects" of gunfire and bullets supposedly striking objects were so sad. I love the scene with the prison super imposed on a mountain range....laughable if it weren't so sad. Monster power line towers also visible in a number of scenes...in one, it is almost like the camera man realized it and just panned the camera slightly to get it out of frame. Last but certainly not least, the opening scene suggests that the story was taking place in Louisiana and it was clearly a totally different climate and geography...looked like California. Repetitive use of "antiqued" photos of the actors and different buildings that were so obviously "movie set" buildings....stop me or I'll go on forever.Don't waste your time...but if there is an agent out there, a producer with some juice and a director worth his or her salt...snatch up these two lead actors and give them a little mentoring.
cageyue A truly dreadful remake. The action is non-existent which in such a dramatic and action packed story is beyond belief. In close up sepia stills (which take up a significant part of the film) you can clearly see that the guns are fake, and poor ones at that with no hole in the muzzle. Got bored well before the end and switched off before it got any worse!Apparently I need to write more lines of text, so I will use those lines to pay homage to the Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway 1967 film of the same title, which even though it was filmed forty six years earlier than this 2013 effort, is far superior in every single way.