Blonde Ice

1948 "ICE in her veins... ICICLES on her heart!"
6| 1h13m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 24 July 1948 Released
Producted By: Martin Mooney Productions
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A golddigging femme fatale leaves a trail of men behind her, rich and poor, alive and dead.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Martin Mooney Productions

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

SnoReptilePlenty Memorable, crazy movie
Forumrxes Yo, there's no way for me to review this film without saying, take your *insert ethnicity + "ass" here* to see this film,like now. You have to see it in order to know what you're really messing with.
BelSports This is a coming of age storyline that you've seen in one form or another for decades. It takes a truly unique voice to make yet another one worth watching.
Matho The biggest problem with this movie is it’s a little better than you think it might be, which somehow makes it worse. As in, it takes itself a bit too seriously, which makes most of the movie feel kind of dull.
dougdoepke On the whole, this cheap little production is better than it ought to be. Sexy Claire (Brooks) is a spider woman, par excellance. She seduces up-scale men, marries them, then kills them. Not exactly the motherly type. Yet the relatively unknown Brooks plays the part in interesting fashion. You can almost see her brain calculating behind an icy exterior. Too bad her career was so brief, confined for whatever reason to the 40's. Paige does well enough as her sometime 'true love'. I'm just wondering if this heart tug was to soften her image for censorship purposes, without it, she's a pretty ruthless case. Also, thin-faced, big-eyed James Griffith excelled at eccentric parts. Here, he sort of mugs it up in semi-humorous fashion, as though he's not taking any of this too seriously. Worse, by implying that he (Al) was ever a romantic interest of Claire's produces a real stretch. The direction by Jack Bernhard is smooth enough, if uninspired. Too bad the production didn't reach for noir lighting since the material is perfect for creepy shadows. Instead, staging and lighting remain conventional, perhaps because of budget constraints. However, I do wish the script had dispensed with the omniscient psychiatrist (Leonard). A lot of films of that period included 'head doctors' and I'm not sure why. I guess he's supposed to bring Claire's behavior within science's grasp. To me, however, it's more intriguing to place some behaviors beyond science.Anyhow, this cheapo remains an interesting little feature. Too bad that with a little more daring and imagination, it could have produced memorable results.
classicsoncall Cool title (no pun intended). This noirish little flick actually has a couple gems of dialog sprinkled throughout, like the one offered by Claire Cummings' first husband Carl Hanneman (John Holland) - "Don't you think you were being a little affectionate for a newly married woman"? That's all that's needed to set the viewer up for a cold and calculating femme fatale on the prowl for upward mobility. I have to say, Leslie Brooks fits the definition of gorgeous babe, but you'll also find her picture in the dictionary next to 'bitch on wheels'. I do wish the writing here was a bit more clever and the the acting much better than the amateurish portrayals we got. Seriously, did Claire (Brooks) really have to call room service with a menu to order OJ, toast and coffee? I can do that without even thinking about it.It doesn't take much for even the casual film viewer to figure this one out well before it's over. What's cool though (there's that word again) is the way Claire rakes all of her lovers over the coals before giving them the old heave-ho. And what gives with that pilot Blackie (Russ Vincent)? I've seen it before and can't figure out why a guy would try to shake someone down who's already shown a propensity to kill. It doesn't take much to pull the trigger one more time now, does it?But you know, this is just one entertaining little flick. I wouldn't go so far as to actually call it a noir film; the only real bad apple is the peach who runs the table with the men in her life. What the picture could have used was a more satisfying ending. It made no sense at all that Claire would come clean just on the old shrink's say so. I'm still mulling that one over.As for actress Leslie Brooks, this was the first time I've seen her, and was intrigued enough to check her credits here on the IMDb. Curiously, she appeared in twenty seven pictures throughout the Forties, and then one more in 1971. I wonder what that was all about.
MisterWhiplash Blonde Ice has a DVD that is almost too good for its own movie - the menu has a special ice-crackling design with dialog from the movie placed over and some of that chilling noir-ish music we all know and admire from the period. The DVD menu hints at it being a smashingly good B-movie, but as it turns out the film itself is just OK. Blonde Ice, one of those stories with the conniving and murderous sexy femme fatale who gets whoever she wants and in this case rich men who get suckered into her grasp, is a picture made for cheap, of course, but also with a cheap script: not much imagination goes into the dialog or the construction of the plot. Even the one possibly fascinating character, the one man, Les Burns (Paige) who has held a torch without shame for Claire (Leslie Brooks) for years and stands by and defends her against murder claims even if he suspects deep down she might have done it, is brushed aside into the conventional column.Brooks is a honey, that much has to be given to her, and she can act in some scenes- in others she just goes through the motions like the rest of the capable cast of character players (most of whom you wont know unless you are some kind of film-noir scholar like Alain Silver or other)- and she does give a decent anchor for some of the emotional scenes, such as at the end when she gives a confession that is as icey as everything else she does in the movie. The direction and writing are on par with her: not spectacular, not ever really a downer. Blonde Ice probably has an amazing poster, one of those you might see in an art-museum installation celebrating pulp fiction advertising. The content itself is just there to pay a couple of small bills and fill some seats for a double feature. It's recommended only to those who sniff out whatever 40s noir might have promise. Like me.
bensonmum2 For most if its runtime, Blonde Ice is a very entertaining b-noir. Leslie Brooks is about as evil a woman as you'll see in one of these movies. She's beautiful, ambitious, and completely ruthless – it's a deadly combination. She's perfectly capable of chewing-up and spitting-out anyone who gets in her way. And, she's not above committing a little murder if the need should arise. Brooks gives a dynamite performance as far as I'm concerned. The rest of the cast is adequate, but nothing spectacular. The weakest point in the film, unfortunately, comes in the final scene. It's almost as if the screenwriters had no idea how to end Blond Ice. What they came up with is so ridiculous and out of character that it really hurts the overall film.A word on the DVD - from what I've read, the VCI disc is the only way to go. The price is not much more than what you would pay for the Alpha DVD and the VCI disc has a much better transfer and a plethora of features.