A Touch of Sin

2013
7.1| 2h11m| en| More Info
Released: 04 October 2013 Released
Producted By: Bandai Visual
Country: Japan
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://atouchofsin.com/
Synopsis

Four independent stories set in modern China about random acts of violence.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with AMC+

Director

Producted By

Bandai Visual

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Lovesusti The Worst Film Ever
Doomtomylo a film so unique, intoxicating and bizarre that it not only demands another viewing, but is also forgivable as a satirical comedy where the jokes eventually take the back seat.
Lachlan Coulson This is a gorgeous movie made by a gorgeous spirit.
Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
cameloguo I think people wrote reviews here don't actually know these 4 stories are all true stories and really happened in The modern Chinese society. The first character, Dahai, is a real serial killer,whose name is Wenhai Hu, killing 14 villiagers in Shanxi province in 2002. Second character, Xiaoyu, is a waitress in Hubei province and stabbed 3 local government officials. Her real name is Yujiao Deng, and she was acquitted of a charge after this scandal was brought up to the internet. Third character, whose real name is Kehua Zhou, was another serial robber killing strangers and taking their bags. He was shot down by the police near his hometown. The last character is a reflection of the suicided employees of Foxconn, the biggest manufacturer of IPhone. It was reported that from 2010 to 2012, there were several employees of Foxconn jumped off the roof due to the heavy workload and military-like management. Another interesting secene is the sexual club, Goden Age, which was among one of those luxury brothels in Dongguan, China. Dongguan was well-known for its sexual industry untill the new government led by Jingping Xi took serious measures against this industry.
Raven-1969 "It is to the credit of human nature, that, except where its selfishness is brought into play, it loves more readily than it hates," wrote Hawthorne, yet darkness wins many battles in four murderous portraits from contemporary China that actually happened. A bold and elusive thief traveling along the margins of society, a gentle and lonely heart worn down by itinerant and mechanical work, a fervent revolutionary upset with corruption and greed, and a solitary soul who longs for a family and yet is surrounded by lust, all find themselves separated from society and the love and fulfillment they strive for. Each lashes out violently at their constraints. Filled with intriguing allusions, impressive depth, compelling themes and fantastic stories, I loved how this film seamlessly wound its way through modern China as well as the human heart. Winner of the best screenplay at Cannes.
kayasmus I found this to be Jia's strongest film to date. The four short films that make up this movie are very much related in that they are based on real events, which makes the unfolding scenes seem surreal, but at the same time evoking great pathos for the protagonists.Going in there are some things to keep in mind. The title and events pay a bit of homage to A Touch of Zen, an older wuxia films, which also featured Buddhism as a key theme. In a Touch of Sin, any kind of faith in anyone just falls apart. There is no love, no happiness, and no success. Dreams are not achieved and even when the protagonists achieve their goals of revenge or justice, they are left bitter and empty. By using real events Jia is sending out a not so subtle message about how many people in China have lost themselves to greed, have suffered and worked hard to no avail. Living standards do not increase due to corruption, one character has lost his connection with his own family, a mistress begs a man to leave his wife, to be beaten up herself while it is implied that the husband is unscathed, and yet another will do anything to feed her child, including selling her body.Anyone who has been to China for long periods of time will have seen these events, or something similar, over and over again and it is the ending of the film that drives this message home. You have only yourself to blame repeated while the camera focuses on a group of blank faces, watching and enjoying a show. Jia is talking to all Chinese who just observe, and he seems passionate here to drive the message home, that they are to blame for how their lives have become. And they need to act if they want things to change.
FilmCriticLalitRao Nobody can deny that like all economic systems, "Capitalism" too is condemned time and again by filmmakers. What is important to note is that "A Touch of Sin" is the first serious attempt by a Chinese director to berate capitalism which is causing irreparable damages to Chinese nation especially to its ordinary population which is unable to figure out how to deal with money and its implications on a person's life. In all frankness, calling "A Touch of Sin" a feature-film would be a travesty of cinema as it is merely a well stitched collection of four different short films about ordinary people in China who have succumbed to pressures. Although it has been highly praised by media all over the world,this new film by Chinese director Jia Zhangke is utterly predictable and does not offer anything new. One wonders on what grounds was it selected for best screenplay prize at Cannes Film Festival 2013 ? When one leaves an independent form of filmmaking for more commercial style of filmmaking, weaknesses in the film are clearly evident. For example-There is an exaggerated scene involving a business man with a wad of currency notes who continually pummels a woman to prove his point that capitalism has not left any scope for human feelings.This scene could have used less violence but Jia Zhangke chose to dramatize it to such an extent that it became almost unbearable to watch.Lastly,this film is replete with numerous scenes of this type where "too much" is done in the name of sophistication at a time when "too little" could also have easily eased things for the film,the director and the viewers.