GamerTab That was an excellent one.

Wordiezett So much average

Stoutor It's not great by any means, but it's a pretty good movie that didn't leave me filled with regret for investing time in it.

Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

healer-2 i just want to make some observations about this show. I never watched Celebrity Apprentice, as I was otherwise occupied, but did see some of the first 5 or 6 seasons. It started out as unique and diverting, and seemed like a good concept for reality TV. The quality seemed to decline maybe by season 4 or 5, because there was more focus on the competing teams and individuals talking about the experience while it was going on. I was wondering, "Why are you busy talking and wringing your hands when you have only a few hours to build a skyscraper (slight exaggeration, but not by much.) So it was becoming everything I hated about The Survivor or shows about people stranded on an island. They sit around as if in an encounter group when they should be out chasing down wild animals and gathering food. The focus was on "feelings," and that seemed to be the direction of The Apprentice.The selection of the winners became increasingly ridiculous. They'd "fire" the best candidate and justify the decision in a way that didn't make sense. By this time I found it easy to let go and stop tuning in. All the encounter group style backbiting was wearing me out.Still, I give my entire viewing experience an "7" because it was diverting enough. It wasn't Law & Order, but it kept me watching for the first few seasons.

greekmuse The entertainment value of Celebrity Apprentice largely depends on the caliber of the "celebrities". That's right, most of the these people, particularity this season, are not celebrities (although not quite as bad as Dancing with the "Stars").Aubrey O'Day thinks she is the most famous of the group--which again doesn't mean much--but I don't know anyone who's heard of her. I did, however, google her Playboy photo: if she didn't raise her arm and two pounds of makeup and coloring had not been applied all around the fake smile, she might have actually looked half decent.Who else? Lisa Lampanelli is an old hag. Like the cat lady, but far uglier, and to be avoided at all costs. Remember the fat girls that got picked on in school? This one never got over it. And unfortunately for Pizza Lampanelli, her comedy routine is outdated and just not that funny anymore compared to Amy Shumer or Whitney Cummings.Arsenio Hall? Passive-aggressive. And grow some cojones, man. Clay Aiken? Obviously no cojones, and will go with the flow, like Penn Jillette.Last season we had the class and mental acumen of John Rich and Marlee Matlin, the creativity of Lil Jon among others, and the comedy of Gary Busey and Meatloaf. This year, not so much.

koziki2003 I can't stand most reality shows and this one is worst than the one with Paris Hilton, and sure it's his company. But "you're fired" or "you're hired", for how many seasons now? After watching the show I wouldn't want to work for the guy with his ego and all and I think watching paint dry has more entertainment valve.I'd love to hear just one person get up and say "Donald I quit and take some of your money and buy a decent hairdo". I see he's even trying to buy fame in the wrestling WWE. I hope he gets hurt so I don't have to see his pathetic face anymore. It must be sad to want fame so bad and have no talent and make an ass of yourself trying to buy it. I'd give this show a negative mark if I could but it gets a 1 and it doesn't deserve that.

domdav2 please as far as the reality of it is concerned Rebbecca should have been gone week three. he fired Chris b/c he made an emotional decision in standing by Mark, but Rebbecca did the same thing and she is somehow being loyal? bump that! she should have been fired that week. Randal made the right decision.also, do you remember when the four were fired b/c they failed to perform the functions of the task? OK, now Rebbecca is suppose to be given a job even though she failed to perform the functions of the job? please. if she could raise money as a kid why could she not do it now she should have left that out.if Randal had said yes, that would not have been fair to the others there that were stronger players than she was, so if they cant be hired than she should not have been either, also him hiring her would be a total slap in the face to previous runner ups, whom themselves had better records than Rebbecca. besides, don was not going to hire her anyway, if he were why would he ask Randal for one and two why would Randal have said "if you think i should be the one and only apprentice please stand" long before don ever said anything about Rebbecca? this was a pub stunt to get people to talking or to have Randal cover up the fact that, he knew people not want him to hire another guy but but instead a lady. however, what was left was reb but he didn't really want her, and why should he? she was the weakest player there next to toral. no, Randal was correct and reb got lucky, at no other time in the history of this show has such a loser ever made the final two! 1-2, please.