Hellen I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

MusicChat It's complicated... I really like the directing, acting and writing but, there are issues with the way it's shot that I just can't deny. As much as I love the storytelling and the fantastic performance but, there are also certain scenes that didn't need to exist.

Humbersi The first must-see film of the year.

Humaira Grant It’s not bad or unwatchable but despite the amplitude of the spectacle, the end result is underwhelming.

Edgar Allan Pooh . . . from the "Sloane Foundation" once again finds Looney Tuner sell-out Friz Freleng filling Elmer Fudd's mouth with coarse garbage promoting job-killing automation in an attempt to brainwash a generation of 10-year-olds, including Donald J. Trumpelstiltskin (whom Elmer Fudd plays by name as his way of rebelling against this Corporate Scam to rig the Looney Tune System). TIME Magazine's Joe Klein reviewed last week's U.S. Presidential Debate for an October issue, declaring that the uncouth Trumpster is still stuck in the 1956 YANKEE DOOD IT World of Donnie-the-Kid. (Since his millions of weak-minded supporters seem like they'd be just as happy to vote for Elmer Fudd as they are backing Trumpenstein or whoever else the Rich People Party dredges up to top their ticket, it will be imperative for a President Gary Johnson or Hillary to carry out mass deportations of this Uppity Know-Nothing Horde to someplace like the Planet Clare.) YANKEE DOOD IT drains away all the goodwill Warner had garnered a decade earlier for its Paean to the Union Label, HOLIDAY FOR SHOESTRINGS. DOOD IT still poses a significant threat to Humanity's Survival.

TheLittleSongbird The other two being By Word of Mouse and Heir-Conditioned, with the former being the best of the three, because it did have some entertaining moments and had something to say. Heir-Conditioned was watchable enough, but while it does make some decent points about economics and investments it did feel heavy-handed, mostly failed to entertain and wasted most of its characters. Yankee Dood It for me is the weakest of the three, mainly because it does feel pointless and fares the worst of the three in entertaining and educating the viewer.Yankee Dood It does have its good points, sure, with all the strengths being exactly the same as the strengths for Heir Conditioned. The animation, in distinctive Fritz Freleng style, is very bright and colourful with some nice background detail and nicely drawn characters. Even better is the vibrant and character music score from Milt Franklyn, it fits wonderfully and does add a lot to the action, it's rousing in energy, orchestration is rich and beautiful and rhythmically it's very lively yet dynamic. Mel Blanc, Arthur Q. Bryan and Daws Butler do reliably strong jobs with the voices, all three have had stronger material but they were still able to deliver some good energy, then again they were nearly always able to bring class and some sort of energy to even the weakest material. Despite having little to do, Sylvester is very nice to see, has some wildly amusing if very predictable moments and his personality is truer to the personality we associate him with than in Heir Conditioned, even with not much to do he didn't feel downplayed but he has been far more interesting a character.However, Yankee Dood It's main problem is that it's not very funny, nor is it very informative. Whereas By Word of Mouse did entertain in its second half and Heir Conditioned had a few decent laughs with the alley cats, Yankee Doodle It's humour is spare, not sharp enough and is not unlike anything else we've seen with Sylvester, it is at best only mildly amusing. Unfortunately, Yankee Dood It also doesn't do a particularly great job on the educating and informing side, despite being the short to have the (slightly) most accessible subject matter of the three it is written in a way that is likely to confuse younger audiences and adults are likely to find it over-simplified and one-dimensionally explored. Some may criticise By Word of Mouse for 'glorifying the wonders of capitalism', but Yankee Dood It does this much more glaringly, with the low prices, higher wages it only shows the good sides of capitalism and not much else. The points the cartoon tries to make is delivered with heavy-handedly as well, so at the end of the day the cartoon, having failed at both its main objectives, just feels pointless.The story is slow-going and what there is of it feels rather sugary sweet, complete with a very forced ending. Despite the good voice acting, the characters' material is not strong enough to carry the cartoon properly. Like in Heir Conditioned, it is nice to see Elmer less of an idiot than usual but with his personality as underplayed as it is what makes Elmer as memorable a character as he is doesn't come through here. The Elf and the Shoemaker are bland characters too, and the Elf's rapport with Sylvester fails to amuse or rouse because the material is so tired and predictable.Overall, not unwatchable but doesn't have an awful lot of point to it. 4/10 Bethany Cox

Lee Eisenberg Friz Freleng had previously portrayed the elves-and-shoemaker story with the very impressive "Holiday for Shoestrings" in 1946. This time, he turns the story into something resembling one of those educational films that "Mystery Science Theater 3000" occasionally showed. Specifically, elf king Elmer Fudd tells the outdated cobbler how mass production will improve things (expwaining the pwocess with his funny pwonunciation)...and all the while, Sylvester is looking to turn the elves into mice.OK, so the rise of these kinds of factories in the post-war years justifies this mindset. Unfortunately, the factories later closed down and moved to the Third World, as we saw in "Roger & Me". I see that "Yankee Dood It" was bankrolled by the Alfred P. Sloan (Sloan or Sloane?) Foundation, so they no doubt wanted to extol what they considered American values. Like Chuck Jones's "Old Glory" (in which Uncle Sam teaches Porky Pig the history of the USA), it comes out almost totally devoid of humor.All in all, this cartoon isn't terrible, but it basically comes across as - yes, I'll say it - propaganda. A far better cartoon dealing with this sort of topic is Chuck Jones's MGM cartoon "The Bear That Wasn't". As for Freleng, he rebounded in 1957 with "Birds Anonymous", "Three Little Bops" and "Show Biz Bugs".

MartyD82-1 The king (voiced by Arthur Q. Bryan) of a team of elves is worried about all the elves missing from his pack and sends one of his remaining elves to retrieve them. The elves are, of course, employed by "the shoemaker." He must somehow retrieve them, and get by the shoemaker's pet Sylvester at the same time. Meanwhile, the elven king drops by and literally gives the shoemaker a lesson in modern business management.In the mid-1950s, Friz Freling was experimenting with pseudo-educational cartoon shorts in much the same vein as the shorts Disney was putting out at around the same time. Yankee Dood-It was probably the best of the bunch, but that's actually saying very little. Sylvester is the obvious comic relief of the cartoon, and aside from his constant attempts at taking advantage of the "Jehosefat" spell (saying "Jehosefat" apparently turns elves into mice), there are absolutely no jokes to speak of. A good third of the cartoon involves the king playing an educational slide show for the shoemaker to teach him how to run his business in the then 20th century. The cartoon's finale is so forced and predictable, it isn't even worth mentioning in "non-spoiler text."Overall, this is a fairly pointless short that seems to be more about Freling trying to do something Disney did a lot better at the same time than doing what he himself does best - which is to make funny, non-PC, non-moralistic cartoons.