Woman in the Dark

1934
5.8| 1h8m| NR| en| More Info
Released: 08 November 1934 Released
Producted By: Select Pictures Corporation
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A recently released prisoner lives alone in his cabin so that his bad temper won't get him back in any more trouble, but his peaceful existence is disrupted when a mysterious woman arrives.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Select Pictures Corporation

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Cubussoli Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!
GurlyIamBeach Instant Favorite.
Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
Mandeep Tyson The acting in this movie is really good.
utgard14 Lightweight crime picture about a man (Ralph Bellamy) recently released from prison for killing a guy in a fight over a girl. It doesn't take long before he finds himself in trouble again over another girl (Fay Wray), thanks to a guy (Melvyn Douglas) who thinks that girl belongs to him. I was anxious to see this due to the stars involved and Dashiell Hammett's name attached. What an immense disappointment this was. The whole thing creaks along like it was made the very day talking pictures were invented. Plodding pace with no memorable lines or scenes. Bellamy does fine playing a tougher role than we're used to seeing him in. But there's a reason why he was eventually typecast as the genial "runner-up" who loses the girl to the more exciting star of the picture. The rest of the cast doesn't stink but no one impresses, either. Phil Rosen's direction is nothing to brag about. This one is a drag, in my opinion. But obviously other reviewers saw something I didn't so give it a shot and see what you think. But keep expectations low.
blanche-2 Out on parole, John Bradley (Ralph Bellamy) has no intention of returning to prison. His first night home, he is visited by Helen Grant (Nell O'Day) whose father is the sheriff. It was over Lil that John got into a brawl that ended in a man's death. John is encouraging her to leave when a woman, Louise Loring (Fay Wray) dressed in a white gown arrives at his house. She's hurt her ankle trying to get to the train station - and away from Tony Robson (Melvyn Douglas). Louise thought that Robson lent her money for her singing career - but it was an investment and he wants a return that isn't monetary.Robson is there with a drunk friend (Reed Brown Jr.) who kills the dog that accompanied him (setting my teeth on edge), goes after Louise, is hit by John, and sustains a concussion, though John thinks he's dead. Tony informs the sheriff, and John and Louise go on the run to his cellmate Logan's (Roscoe Ates) place. It goes from there, with the police showing up yet again.This is an okay movie, with the comedy coming from the visit at the Logan's -- he's an ex-jewel robber who is dying to get his hands on the jewels Robson gave Louise. Bellamy's career in films spanned 59 years, and his stage career spanned thirty. Here he's 30 years old, playing a somewhat laconic role, though flirtatious with Louise - his sonorous voice making him instantly recognizable.Fay Wray was supremely beautiful and does a good job as Louise - though why anyone would walk in total darkness through what looked like woods to get to a train station is beyond me. I've seen too much true crime, I guess.There was nothing special about this film, it was just nice to see the beautiful Wray and handsome Bellamy as a young man.
mark.waltz When Ralph Bellamy is released from jail for manslaughter, he returns home to mixed reaction from society, and quickly gets caught up in possibly another charge when a man he hits while protecting another woman (Fay Wray) ends up in a coma and lingers between life and death. On the run to avoid returning to prison, he anxiously awaits the outcome while in hiding. But things are not what they seem to be, and a witness to the attack (Melvyn Douglas) could be the key to Bellamy's exoneration.An above average B film with a fantastic cast, this programmer keeps the tension up as to how everything will unravel. Roscoe Ates is thrown in for comic relief as Bellamy's ex-cellmate, his constant stuttering routine getting a little old now, yet unobtrusive as far as weakening the film. There are some interesting shots of Wray running through the darkened countryside, but her character is never fully developed to truly grab your interest in her. The future "other man", Bellamy gives a gripping performance, and it will be him you keep your eyes on. This is also a bit of a darker character for Douglas to play, soon to be well utilized in some of the great screwball comedy's of the 1930's and 40's. A unique ending thrown in is one you won't see coming, and helps this rise above predictability and mediocrity.
MartinHafer This film is also known under the title "Woman in the Shadows".Fay Wray, Ralph Bellamy,and Melvyn Douglas star in this film. It's obviously not a prestige film for the studio—as Bellamy and especially Douglas are far from familiar faces when the film debuted.The film begins with Bellamy being released from prison following a conviction for manslaughter—as he killed a man while having a fight. He knows he has a serious anger problem and needs to control it if he plans on staying on the good side of the law. However, a local sheriff seems determined to lock him up again—and the ultra-sleazy Douglas hatches a plan to destroy Bellamy—all after they have a fight that is prompted by Douglas' sexually assault on Wray! At first Wray and Bellamy try to escape—then Wray tries to kiss up to Douglas to get him to drop the charges following the fight. In the end, however, there's a bit of a twist and all is right once again. Overall, this isn't a bad time-passer, but the plot seems pretty tough to believe and the story never really felt that engaging. In addition, when the film began it made a big writing boo-boo. There was way too much exposition to explain back story instead of allowing the action to explain it. In other words, characters had VERY stilted conversations in which they discussed the back story with characters that already should have known this. Sloppy.