Moustroll
Good movie but grossly overrated
SpunkySelfTwitter
It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.
Gary
The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.
andrew
OK, firstly I would not recommend this film as it had lots of bad but in saying that there was lots of potential.It was nice to see a story that has been untold about WW2 and the Germans and Japanese and the A Bomb. The problem with this film is that its slow and drawn out with things that are not of interest. The acting is poor and sadly some of the actors are so bad that it brings the rest of the cast down. There should have been more effort with the script and the background story, this would of then made us care about the crew and what there missions was. In the middle of the film there is a 15min piece of someone that we don't care about getting his leg amputated by a doctor who would look bad on general hospital.I think that the producers should sit down and look at there mistakes, don't give up as we need more War films, refine the script and build a good story, then with some better actors you will be on a winner.Hope this is of some help
Dee Bundy
What do you get when you mix a beta cam recorder, a Sony "My First Editor", and a crew of inept and talentless hacks? A film that is far superior to this horrid attempt at a movie. The cameraman should be barred from handling anything that can capture an image. The first ratings were, without a doubt, posted by the same inferior morons who created this heap. DO NOT, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, SEE THIS FILM. Compared to this, Gigli deserves an Oscar. I would rather sit through a midnight showing of Batman in Colorado than watch this piece of shite again. I'm giving it two stars out of sympathy, and the lack of negative stars on IMDb.
robertbocelli
The Germans and the Japanese getting together for a little party. Well Pearl Harbor did wake up a sleeping Giant and now USS Seaviper has done the same. It is what the Silent Service did in World War II. It was the submarine service that broke the back of the Japanese navy and this film is a good chapter in that effort. The characters are real and delivered by actors that we are not familiar with great work. It is a breathe of fresh air to see actors other than the usual Hollywood faces, it makes it more realistic. I hope to see them in future films. High sound quality. I would like to know how they shot the submarine on the surface there are not many that are still sea worthy these days. The underwater stuff is obviously CGI work, but very well done, just enough to get the point on screen. Go see it, you will love it, some heart warming scenes TUTTI BRAVO!
moorestanley322
Read the synopsis and you get what you see! The German U-Boat, U-234, from the Port of Kiel is trading cargo with the Japanese. USS Seaviper must locate and stop this dangerous exchange. The Captain of USS Seaviper must go ashore to conduct reconnaissance on an island near Sumatra, but the ship is left in the hands of Mister Cutter, after the Executive Officer is injured in battle. A conflict between Cutter and the Chief of the Boat puts the submarine in jeopardy. Seaviper is trapped below the surface, with decreasing oxygen, and a Japanese destroyer hunting them from above. Damage to the boat also leave her survival in question. They must fight the Japanese destroyer and get the information about U-235 back to Pearl Harbor. The film portrays the exact story promised in the above synopsis, no surprise and no silly Hollywood gimmicks. These guys know how to write a script. See it! You will love it. Chief you are the father of this boat. Great CGI especially for an Indie film!
