VividSimon Simply Perfect

Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

Kaelan Mccaffrey Like the great film, it's made with a great deal of visible affection both in front of and behind the camera.

Rainey Dawn Romulus, the founder of Rome and his men want wives. The Romans decide to take them from the Sabines and they head to Sabinia to find them. The men of Sabinia will fight back to save their wives and daughters from the first Romans.The movie is just okay (being generous), it's not really funny these days - but might have been humorous at the time of it's release.This film has 007 himself, Roger Moore, in his early career. Roger Moore fans might find this film interesting for that reason.Overall I was not happy with the film. It's just not funny to me.2/10

Leofwine_draca ROMULUS AND THE SABINES starts off on a strong footing as it keeps the action moving with plenty of peplum staples: there are plenty of gorgeous Italian women in low-cut dresses, sweaty guys on horseback, people chasing each other through the woods, and a little fighting here and there. The biggest novelty value of this film is the appearance of a pre-SAINT Roger Moore, playing Romulus, the founder of Rome! I admit I was a little bit sceptical of how Moore would 'fit' into a production like this, and it's hard to separate his suave, James Bond-type persona with the ancient hero and leader of men he plays here. Indeed Moore's character isn't much of a fighter either, preferring to spend his time seducing the ladies – so nothing new there then. However Moore's performance grew on me as the film went on, and it's as good an acting job as you'll find anywhere in a peplum film. And at least he dubs his own voice in this one.Otherwise the film is pretty low par, losing momentum about halfway through the proceedings and never really picking up from there. The simple story of kidnapped women isn't really enough to last the running time, so things are padded out with some laboured comedy involving a short-sighted comic character and an Amazon-type woman who only really appears at the beginning and end of the production. The filmmakers attempt to inject some excitement into the proceedings with a last-reel mass battle, but it ends on a ludicrous note – the attackers suddenly deciding they don't want to attack, after all – and unwisely takes place at night time, somewhat ruining the spectacle of guys getting arrows through their necks and women dying to protect their lovers.Aside from Moore, the film boasts plenty of decent roles for women, who take more of the centre stage here than usual. The likes of the classically beautiful Mylene Demongeot and Giorgia Moll certainly make this film easy on the eye. Folco Lulli gives Moore a run for his money as the wise king of Sabinia and there are cameo appearances from French star Jean Marais as Moore's father, who coincidentally is Mars, God of War! It's a shame the plot wasn't a little more involving, as with the talent involved it could have been something special.

Jonathon Dabell Pre-stardom Roger Moore is preposterously cast as Romulus, the founder of Rome, in this enjoyably awful peplum made by a largely Italian cast and crew. It's quite something to witness Moore - skinny-armed, skinny- legged and curly-haired – issuing orders to massed ranks of horny Roman citizens as they plead with him to allow women into their lives. The film is undoubtedly cheap and feeble stuff… but there's a degree of innocent charm to be found in some of these old sword 'n' sandal offerings, especially ones which feature a future superstar in a role which will one day come back to haunt him. Romulus And The Sabines (or whatever title you know it by, for it has many… Rape Of The Sabines, L'Enlevement Des Sabines, El Rapto De Las Sabinas, etc. etc.) is definitely amusing on a curiosity level – if you are a collector of Moore's movies, for instance, this long-lost obscurity is an irresistible hoot.As the story begins, Rome is little more than a village under the early stages of construction by various fugitives, travellers and vagabonds – all of them male - who have chosen to swear allegiance to King Romulus (Roger Moore). After months of hard toil, the men are growing weary and disillusioned. In particular, they long for women to be brought into their lives and rightly point out that their efforts will be for nought if no babies are being born to populate their newly built kingdom. Reluctantly, Romulus agrees to submit to their demands and asks Titus (Folco Lulli) - king of the neighbouring kingdom of Sabinia - if he will donate some of his women for marriage to the men of Rome. Titus refuses and instead sends a cartload of pigs to the Romans, greatly angering them. But Romulus comes up with another plan, to kidnap the Sabine women by force and bring them back to Rome to repopulate the rapidly expanding nation. Things are complicated further when Romulus finds himself falling desperately in love with Rhea (Mylène Demongeot) a vestal virgin and daughter of King Titus. Meanwhile, the Sabinian soldiers prepare to attack Rome and free their women… but the question is: do the women truly want to be rescued?There is some incredibly banal dialogue in the film at times. "Hey! There's no need to pull my hair!" declares a Sabine girl, rather prissily, as a Roman attempts to drag her away from her home and family forever. "She's a vestal virgin, Romulus. We have consecrated her to the Gods", warns Rhea's mother as he lecherously ogles the young princess. "Why didn't you consecrate her to the SONS of the Gods?" Romulus ruefully retorts, referring to his self-proclaimed title as the son of Mars. The whole film is stuffed with similarly over-ripe exchanges. Some of the crowd scenes and battle sequences betray the film's ultra-low budget, but there are a handful of decent moments amid the morass – the kidnapping of the Sabine women is enjoyably handled, and the climactic clash between the Sabinians and Romans (prematurely aborted at the discovery of a baby's birth which unites the bloodline of both kingdoms) is competently done. In other aspects the film is something of an embarrassment, especially its cringeworthy attempts to inject humour via a short-sighted Roman ambassador whose visual impairment results in numerous zany pratfalls. Overall, there can be no serious argument that Romulus And The Sabines has genuine artistic merit, nor that it is a neglected gem, but strictly on a curiosity level it has a degree of charm and interest.

Armand childish, heroic in few moments but not impressive. testimony of a time , in which blockbusters are skin for historical subjects, it is seductive only for cast. and for ambiguous intentions of director. sure, Roger Moore or Jean Marais are perfect names for epic but, in same time, important source of frustration. because the beautiful story is a strange mixture of feminism, myths, jokes and love story. all in same place, maybe the public is master of choices. the tale is thin, the fight scenes - nice, the beauty - not spectacular but interesting for understand sensitivity of a time. but the central error is its role of page from a movie type. after so many films inspired by Antiquity it is difficult to be happy at meeting with "Il ratto delle sabine". not for the force of the other creations - it is not Spartacus or Ben Hur - but for the ambition of director to say all in not well manner.