Invaderbank
The film creates a perfect balance between action and depth of basic needs, in the midst of an infertile atmosphere.
Aneesa Wardle
The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.
Kaydan Christian
A terrific literary drama and character piece that shows how the process of creating art can be seen differently by those doing it and those looking at it from the outside.
zardoz-13
Robert Dix plays a hard-drinking, paddle-wheel, riverboat skipper in "See Here, Private Hargrove" director Wesley Ruggles' atmospheric adventure yarn "Roar of the Dragon," co-starring Edward Everett Horton, Garbo lookalike Gwili Andre, Arline Judge, and C. Henry Gordon. For the record, "Cimarron" scenarist Howard Estabrook derived his screenplay from George Kibbe Turner's novella "Passage to Hong Kong." Apparently, "King Kong" producer Merian C. Cooper and Jane Bigelow penned the story; I couldn't find anything more in depth about the historical background about this David O. Selznick producer, and IMDb states that there is no copyright for Turner's material. Nevertheless, this exciting 1932 melodrama occurs in Manchuria with a murderous Russian renegade on the rampage, Voronsky (C. Henry Gordon of "Mata Hari"), with his army of Tartar bandits. The ruthless Voronsky aims to exact vengeance on Captain Chauncey Carson (Richard Dix of "Cimarron") because our hero shot off most of the villain's left ear. Apparently, before the film unfolds, Voronsky had had an encounter with our gallant hero and damaged the paddle-wheel on Carson's steamboat. The heroic Carson and his passengers are holed up for the time being in a small town, while labors repair the paddle-wheel. Naturally, the commercial riverboat owner Johnson (Dudley Digges of "Son of Fury") isn't pleased with the way that things are happening when he receives the news that Voronsky has sworn to kill Carson and take the passengers hostage. While Voronsky allows his injured ear to heal, he dispatches a platoon of riflemen to attack the hotel where everybody is holed up. "Roar of the Dragon" takes place principally in the hotel where our heroes and heroines have fortified themselves against Voronsky's depredations. As it turns out, Carson has a small arsenal of weapons at his disposal, and they repulse the initial wave of horsemen with a tripod-mounted machine gun. When Voronsky' second in command returns with news that they haven't killed Carson and taken hostages, he shoots the man on the spot. Edward Everett Horton, who made a name of himself as the narrator of "The Bullwinkle Show," shows a different side of himself. He takes over as the man behind the machine gun and mows down his share of Voronsky's minions. This was a surprise to me since he usually plays more reserved characters in civilized movies. Most everybody escapes from the besieged hotel, but there are a few casualties. "Roar of the Dragon" unspools at a snappy pace and nobody gives a bad performance. Truly, it is tragic that Dix's leading lady, Gwili Andre, had such a brief career as an actress. She had been compared with Greta Garbo in appearance. Ruggles doesn't let the action slow down too often in this 67-minute actioneer.
Kittyman
"Roar of the Dragon" (1932) and "Barricade" (1939) have essentially the same plots (as well as length). In China in the 1930s, Mongol raiders corner westerners in a building. It is in a hotel in the former; it is in the US embassy in the latter. They are refugees from a riverboat in the former; they are refugees from a train in the latter. The leading man in the former is an alcoholic riverboat captain; the leading man in the latter is an alcoholic reporter.The IMDb rating for the former is 6.5; the rating for the latter is 5.7. Those ratings, in my opinion, should be reversed. The "Roar of the Dragon" lacks memorable scenes, while, despite its many production problems, "Barricade" has several (such as Baxter and Faye fleeing across a wheat field while the raiders try to burn them out).Additionally, the "Roar of the Dragon" suffers from numerous problems. And it is hard not to have them detract from one's enjoyment. There are plot problems. No one suggests boarding-up the hotel's windows and doors, and, as a result, one person is killed and another kidnapped. The raiders make no attempt to destroy the refugee's only means of escape, the riverboat, even though it is docked nearby and virtually undefended. There are stupidity problems. The hero makes no attempt to ferret out the spies he has been informed lurk within the hotel, or even to exercise caution by having guards protect his limited water supplies. There are coincidence problems. A main character is killed when the hero's machine gun jams just as the other is being attacked. On the other hand, other than the question of "who put the rug over the trap door?" when the embassy refugees retreat into the cellar, the actions in "Barricade" proceed quite logically, given the situation cast members are said to be in.So my advice, therefore, is to skip "Roar of the Dragon" and watch "Barricade" instead
samhill5215
The most interesting thing about this movie is the collection of could have, should have moments that under the right direction and with the right script would have resulted in a much better adventure. A bit reminiscent of "The Sand Pebbles", the story has much potential which the dialog fails to deliver. Character development is all but nonexistent for a group of interesting individuals. And don't get me started on the pitiful editing. But what makes it worth a look is the collection of actors chosen for this turkey. Gwili Andre, the tragic Dane who chose fame by immolation, Arlene Judge, famous for her eight marriages, Edward Everett Horton in his most woefully miscast role. His wild-eyed intensity just doesn't translate well into heroic action. He just looks ridiculous. As for Andre, she had the looks but not the talent. The veterans, Richard Dix, Zazu Pitts, and C. Henry Gordon acquit themselves well as the true professionals they were despite the poor material they were given to work with. So there you have it. A pretty bad movie that's nonetheless worth a look.
John Seal
This brisk action movie, set in deepest Manchuria, stars Richard Dix as a dipsomaniac riverboat captain thrust into a precarious situation: rescuing a mixed bag of travelers, children, and ne'e'r-do-wells from a bandit, played with wicked intent by C. Henry Gordon. Amongst the motley crew are Zasu Pitts as a nervous society lady, Arline Judge as a flapper with a heart of gold, and Danish-born Gwili Andre as a Garbo-like woman of mystery. The film is brilliantly shot by Edward Cronjager, with some top-notch action sequences, but Howard Estabrook's screenplay doesn't do enough to establish its characters, perhaps not surprising considering the film's 68 minute running time. Nonetheless, this gets a strong recommendation, especially for fans of pre-code cinema, who will appreciate scenes such as Gordon having a hot iron applied to the hole in his head where an ear used to be.
