Scanialara You won't be disappointed!

Spoonatects Am i the only one who thinks........Average?

Huievest Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

Retired508 One of the most contrived movies ever made. What jury would convict a man who left a note saying what he did, and was accused by a man who wanted the accused wife, and with no corroborating evidence. In announcing his decision, the judge announces his reasons as if they wouldn't have been made in open court, and then assigns the convicted to be paroled to his accuser. Really! And what kind of parole makes the convicted a slave to his keeper so much so that he can't even get married without his permission. Even in the final scene, Jeffey conveniently carries the receipt with him that proves what he did and then this receipt is conveniently found on him.Really now. Finally, when Jeffey, although drunk, somehow not only finds his prey, but can shoot so accurately that he can hit the motor of the boat.Then, we are led to believe that even though Ida Lupino shoots Jeffey, everything will be all right. Come on now.

jacobs-greenwood Screen written by producer Edward Chodorov, it stars Ida Lupino, Cornel Wilde, Celeste Holm and Richard Widmark (in his third film), and was directed by Jean Negulesco. The title was unfortunately reused for a Patrick Swayze –vehicle some 40 years later, so I thought that reviewing this classic might help those who've only seen the 1989 movie to forget.Although it features a now clichéd storyline – two friends from different backgrounds, one wealthy and another from a poorer family, that grew up from childhood through surviving a war together, end up clashing over the same woman as adults – Road House (1948) is film noir drama that will hold one's interest and is worth a look because of its stars' performances.The story, written by Margaret Gruen and Oscar Saul, was photographed by cinematographer Joseph LaShelle, who'd won his Academy Award four years earlier for filming Otto Preminger's Laura (1944) which, like this one, had a small but memorable cast. While there are a few other supporting players – such as an Arthur O'Connell lookalike (O.Z. Whitehead) playing a character that's aptly named Art, an uncredited Jack Lee as the dependable bartender Sam, and Ray Teal as (you guessed it) a policeman – the screen-time is dominated by the four principals.The film is set in the fictional small town of Elton (west of Chicago and not too far south of the Canadian border), population 14,270. The locale where most of the plot takes place is Jefty's Road House, an establishment outside of the one hotel town that features a restaurant, a bar, a bowling alley, and a décor that includes antlers (which is also the name of the hotel) and other hunter paraphernalia of its owner, Jefferson T. 'Jefty' Robbins (Widmark). It's managed by athletically-built Pete Morgan (Wilde), a former state bowling champion, who used to be a pin boy with his rich friend Jefty (at his father's alley).Enter Lily Stevens (Lupino), the latest in a long line of 'talent' that Jefty met during a drunken weekend in the Windy City; apparently, he woos the ladies by promising them a gig in his 'nightclub'. But when Jefty tires of them, it's Pete's job to "send them back where they came from". However, Lily doesn't fit the mold for two reasons – Jefty has yet to successfully overwhelm her with his charms AND she actually has talent or, as cashier Susie Smith (Holm) remarks, "she does more without a voice than anybody I've ever heard".Holm, in only her fourth film, plays a role that would become somewhat stereotypical for her – a part that Joan Blondell made famous – a sassy gal whose love is taken for granted by the movie's hunk (Wilde) and is therefore destined to fade into the background when the femme fatale (Lupino) arrives on the scene. True to form, she's got a "heart of gold" such that she becomes the new couple's ally when needed.Upset that Jefty has promised to pay Lily an inordinate amount ($250 per week for 6 weeks) which cuts into his profits (hence pay), Pete tries to force her to leave town before she's even sung her first torch song. But she's a tough streetwise road weary gal that's tired of drifting and ready to stay in one place for a while, hence her acceptance of Jefty's offer without the usual (sexual) reciprocals.Sure that his normal attributes will eventually win her over though, Jefty confidently puts Lily in the company of the muscle-bound Pete, whom he has to practically threaten to get to teach her to bowl. Naturally, Lily is quickly attracted to Jefty's more physically attractive friend, but her attempts to get Pete to play house with her are resisted until two things happen: Jefty leaves town for a week of moose hunting at his cabin in the wilderness AND a burly drunk named Dutch – who decides that the sexy singer is for him, during one of her more seductive songs – starts a bar brawl that causes Pete to 'fight for' and rescue Lily. After that, Pete succumbs and the two begin to make plans for a life together.However, when Jefty returns, he's made up his mind to marry Lily; he's even gone so far as to obtain a marriage license which he shows to Pete. But after Pete tells Jefty that he and Lily are in love and that they're planning to get married, Jefty becomes very angry. When Pete and Lily decide to leave town to elope, Jefty has them picked up by the police at the railroad station. Pete has been framed for robbery by Jefty; he is arrested, jailed and later convicted for the bogus charge, and sentenced to 2-10 years for the crime.But Jefty had convinced the judge to allow Pete to serve probation, under his care so that he could control his friend's relationship with Lily. Shortly after this, 'we' are treated to the cruel laugh that helped Widmark earn an Oscar nomination in his film debut as Tommy Udo in Kiss of Death (1947).But the additional illogical and contrived events that follow lessen rather than enhance what remains in this melodrama – instinctively most moviegoers will know that someone is going to die (and who) – though the aforementioned characters' traits are reinforced and refined: Lupino's is tough, Holm's is helpful, Widmark's is psychotic etc..

verbusen Spoilers....I won't go so far as to give this a one star review but I will agree with what the other low rated reviewers have said. On the down side the script is really, really, stupid. Ida is hired as a lounge act for six weeks for a country night club with a bowling alley. So the only place in town to go to has the same act for six weeks? That would get old really fast. And I asked my wife while watching this, did something happen in Chicago before this movie started to make Widmark's character go head over heals for Lupino? If Chicago happened, they never showed it. Maybe it was the gravely singing cig voice she has (which is a turn on for me). But I mean, come on, they never kiss in the film and he's head over heels for her? Then the movie flies really fast to a forced ending which is ridiculous, IMHO.OK here's the good, Ida singing One More For The Road. I had watched this as a double feature at home with "Macao" and Jane Russell had sung that same song and this version was much better (again IMHO). Another good thing, the bar fight, that was good. And finally, the night club was really cool, I imagined myself hanging out there, that would have been really nice.More Spoilers.....What could have saved this film for me? When Widmark comes into the kitchen with Ida and Cornell kissing and does nothing, if that went into a 3 way thing, that would have been memorable (but this isn't a European film so, NOT!). Another thing would have been after Cornell gets the damning envelope evidence at the end Widmark kills them all and gets off clean, that would have been a memorable ending. Alas, this is made in 1948 not 1988 so it didn't happen and we get a rushed lame movie. I'm sure it killed some time in the theaters back in the day. It's kind of like what we would see on TV in the 70's on a Quinn Martin production or ABC Mystery Movie of the week except its 1948 and TV wasn't big yet. 5 of 10, IMHO.

rosyrnrn When you're used to Lana Turner in the Postman Always Rings Twice, and compare it to this low budget, low talent, low quality film, well, I was just embarrassed for Ida Lupino's 'singing' (more like talking) and non-piano playing scenes. When the first non-singing scene started and all the people just stared flatly at her, I was positive they were all going to roll their eyes and start leaving or at least talking among themselves (She stinks, c'mon let's get out of here). The actors are flat - emotions are deflated. And Ida is a real spoiled bi-otch throughout - just a 100% turnoff. This was like Betty Boop on conscious sedation meets a gas station attendant in nowhere's ville USA. The story was flat, the music was flat, the acting was flat, her chest was... no never mind. I felt sad for the rest of the actors. Perhaps if the right actress was to have been given the lead role, and the men actors had more emotion, then the film could have had a chance. Sorry for offending those of you who thought it was out of this world. I wouldn't have minded if it stayed out of this world.