Money Monster

2016 "Not every conspiracy is a theory."
6.5| 1h38m| R| en| More Info
Released: 13 May 2016 Released
Producted By: TriStar Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Financial TV host Lee Gates and his producer Patty are put in an extreme situation when an irate investor takes over their studio.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

TriStar Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

GurlyIamBeach Instant Favorite.
Ceticultsot Beautiful, moving film.
Bereamic Awesome Movie
Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.
bardenboy-77569 We never asked for something as cringy as this to watch in our lives. No need to explain, but will anyway, plot/story = dull characters = no emotion, apart from the bomber. So in general conclusion, god it was bad.
Maz-hell This movie is pretty good as a movie. Lets get the obvious parts first, shall we?The plot is pretty modern... and I mean, modern. It is a plot that could just worked at this time and place. This is both good and bad: Good because you actually feel that something like this could happen at any moment. Bad because it makes the movie obsolete in the exact moment something like this can be proven that would not work. It is a deep plot, but extremely unlikely that in any event similar they just don't destroy the receiver easily. Also it overhauls: you perceive the plot twists a lot of time before they happen.The characters are solid, but not enough for you to care about them. Not even George Clooney's face would make you bet for him, although he is a really solid actor.The music is terrible. Melodramatic I-know-I-heard-this-before music mixed with rap.Cinemathography and photography? Excellent. Just on point. It is a movie about making TV. It works.In short, not a good movie, not a bad movie. Just a middle field movie with nothing special. Watch it once and forget about it.
Ken Adams Only in hollywood would they make a movie where a guy holding hostage with gun and bomb is a victim. And this guy was clever enough to walk pass security but yet dumb enough to be detected wondering around on air with no clue? And before he put the bomb vest on to Clooney, no one could tackle him? There were like 5 other camera men and Clooney!
Robert J. Maxwell George Clooney plays one of those financial news network know-it-alls, rolling up his sleeves and getting to work upping his predictions about some stocks and damning others. He's self centered and petty. He wears costumes and does the macarena at the introduction to his show, which is shot on a New York set full of elaborate displays of electronic junk. Julia Roberts, the show's director, is in the control room behind a glass panel, providing the voice in his ear. Then, during one routine but colorful show, Jack O'Connell sneaks onto the set, holds everyone at gunpoint and makes Clooney don an explosive vest. O'Connell, an ordinary working stiff from Queens, has lost his life saving investing in a stock that Clooney had pimped and that had then dropped like a plumb line, just like mine always do. O'Connell angrily queries Clooney about the $800 million lost in one day by Ibis Corporation. Well, the situation is tense, I can tell you.The technology was sometimes over my head. There were TV cameras and monitors all over the place and prominent use was made of smart phone like Blackberries and Blueberries and everybody is texting one another and shouting into microphones and making sure their earplugs were properly seated in the external auditory canals and I don't know what all. This sometimes induced a confused state of consciousness but didn't interfere with the essence of the plot. The CEO of Ibis had used a manual override on the algorithm (or "algo") and sneakily caused the stock to drop after shorting it. Something like that, anyway. Clooney, having just found this out, accuses the CEO of fraud. But is it? It sounds more like larceny of some sort, or maybe embezzlement. No matter.It was directed by Jodie Foster, who is smart and who knows her way around cameras. She does a decent enough job but the details of the script are torturous and sometimes you can get lost in them. Who's shouting to whom around here? And how in the name of Bog could she have let O'Connell get away with waving that pistol around so wildly -- and holding it sideways, something that became a cliché many years ago. It made me wince.Clooney is fine, as usual. He's a pretty good actor. There are a plethora of stars that play action scenes impassively, but when Clooney is batted around the set or has a pistol shoved in his face he looks genuinely scared. Have you ever seen (or imagined) Clint Eastwood or Arnold Schwarzenegger or Sylvester Stallone look truly scared? No? I thought not. The best they can do when threatened with lethal force is look mildly annoyed.Julia Roberts is Julia Roberts, looking no less good without ten layers of iridescent make up. Caitriona Balfe is just fine as Ibis's PR person, formally known as a chief communications officer. She's very sexy and she's Irish. But I felt sorry for the aggrieved Jack O'Connell. He overacts wildly, uses a fake New York City accent (he's Irish too), and has some sort of speech impediment, causing him to deliver a pale simulacrum of his most passionate lines. At the same time, he certainly LOOKS the part of the washed out urban loser.All together, not a bad movie but not a particularly well-done movie either -- not even a glimpse of Maria Bartiromo. Better to have to sit through "Money Monster" than to have invested in Lucent Technology.