Lucybespro It is a performances centric movie

Pluskylang Great Film overall

Salubfoto It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

Quiet Muffin This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.

macmets-923-677010 It's bad enough Mia Farrow was snubbed by the Academy for Rosemary's Baby, but she should have won an Oscar for her performance in this. Dustin Hoffman is in full "Graduate" and "Midnight Cowboy" form but this is clearly Mia's movie. This film is an absolute gem! Peter Yates pulled off another great film and one which would never be made today - it's too character driven and nuanced - not enough happens - for Hollywood today. But oh, so much happens between the lines. There are voice-overs of Dustin and Mia's character's thoughts - which totally work - but because of the quality of the their performances, could easily have been eliminated.

morrison-dylan-fan For a good part of 2010,a family friend would mention to me how when ever he sees an interview with Dustin Hoffman,this film seems to never be mentioned at all,even though it was made during the "Golden Decade" (the 70s")and that it also has a very good cast & crew.So,around November I went looking round for the film as a Christmas present.And though it has sadly not come out in the UK,I was luckily able to find a copy of the film from the states.When it arrived,I felt that since it had taken a good amount of time to find the film,that it was worth watching to see what it was all about. The plot:After having spent the night together,two people (John and Mary,who both don't know each others names)wake up in bed together.When they both go down stairs,so John can cook some breakfast,they both start to think of each other in a very cynical way.This is because they both usually run off right away after having spent the night with someone,which is partly done,because they have had some very disappointing relationships in the past.As Mary starts to see how much of a "boring" bachelor lifestyle John has (staying inside,cooking and listening to Brass Band music as he looks out of his windows )Whilst she mainly wants to be a very outgoing type of person.Though she stays round at Johns place a lot longer than she would have anticipated (which she decides to use,to ask him about some of his past relationships.)And at the point,where it seems that both of them might like the relationship to keep going and to become more meaningful,Mary suddenly disappears!.Although John knows what part of the city she lives in (although he has not got the flats number,or address.)Since he did not think of taking a photo of her,or asking what her name is,the only thing that John does know,is that it is going to be a very long night,on his search to meet Mary again. View on the film:One of the things that stuck out most to me about the film,was how surprisingly quiet director Peter Yates (who sadly died just two days after I had viewed this great film) had made the film.Yates does very well at showing the slight nervous awkwardness that the two main characters have around each other when they awake,with hints given with the mood of the film,that they both perhaps,would like this to be a deeper relationship.With the screenplay by John Mortimer (which is based on the book by Mervin Jones) giving John and Mary some excellently cynical lines,especially in the clever narration of the film,which is done so the whole audience knows what they both REALLY think of each other (and oddly,I feel that parts of the narration in the film,may have inspired some scenes of the excellent anti- ROM-com film (500) Days of Summer.)With a good portion of the film being set in one flat,the performances of Dustin Hoffman and Mia Farrow make the small flat,almost feel like a mansion.Hoffman first shows John as someone who is completely happy with their routine in life,into some one who seems to really be trying to get out of his comfort zone,when it seems that he might be about to lose something special.For her performance,Farrow does really well at showing Marys outgoing personality change,as she starts to realise that she really likes John,and that she does not need to pressurise him in a forceful way.Final view on the film:An excellent,"quiet" movie,with some witty lines,two very good leads and great directing from the late Peter Yates.

hasosch There are movies where people feel that they are underrated. Many of the comments that have been written suspect this for "John and Mary". Moreover, when a movie is built on dialectical experiments, thus focusing communicative structures, very easily the impression rises that the plot is thin or the story more or less absent. Neither of that is the case in "John and Mary".John and Mary meet one night in a New Yorker Bar. They are attracted to one another. The next scene shows them already in the morning in John's apartment. He is still lying in bed, pretending to be asleep, in reality watching Mary sniffling around his photos, drawers and other personal belongings. The director did without the usual "bridge"-scene, where He asks Her if she wants to come for a drink up to him, and so on. Why tell? We see it in all other movies where such scenes happen.Then the scene changes to breakfast. John is explaining to Mary that he buys organic farmer's eggs - it be worth the extra-trip. She thinks: Aha, a health-guru! The specialty is now that we hear what she thinks. She quietly comments everything he says and does. This goes so far that one time he really assumes that she sad something. She denies. How did he come to such an idea? Because he, too, is commenting what she is doing. However, he does it differently. She listens basically to what he is saying. He looks basically how she is behaving (according to a quip by Oscar Wilde). And so, what we see as voyeurs and not so much as audience (audire = "to hear, listen"), is an extremely complex network of flashbacks and flash-forwards, of what did happen in the past of John and Mary and of what may or may not happen in their common or not common future. Guessing a situation for the present means to extrapolate it into the future by using a strange mixture of logic and everyday's experience.The most amazing situations in the movies are there, where one person who makes a flash, is called back in "reality" by inference of the other person. One has the impression that the face of this person fits still to what she was thinking and not to the real situation on which she did not participate. So, there is an "imaginary rest" on the face of the called person, and this imaginary rest can influence enormously the whole ongoing situation by influencing the reaction of the calling person.This is, very broadly drawn, the content of this extraordinary movie, played by two of America's most gifted actors. In the end, we know: Only then, when real and imaginary dialog would coincide, one would be able to change the world by words. This means, John and Mary could reach by communication the desired status of relationship. But the two forms of communication never coincide, and so we use the imaginary dialog in order to govern the real dialog and make it controllable. However, communication is feedback, and strangely enough, from feedbacks alone new things can arise.

henriks-2 I don't agree with Leonard Maltin's review about the slow pace of the movie. This is deliberate, and a sign of the times and the characters' situation. For those of you who are interested in Marantz trivia, in this movie, John (Dustin Hoffman) has an exclusive vintage Marantz HiFi setup. In view at times will be the Marantz 19 receiver and also the very unusual Marantz tangential record player... Unfortunately, the movie is not yet available on video!?