Fairaher The film makes a home in your brain and the only cure is to see it again.

Lidia Draper Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.

Zlatica One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

Philippa All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

weezeralfalfa This classic romantic story of a divided 15th century France is based upon the 1901 romantic novel and play of the same name. There were 2 musical film versions, as well, in 1930 and 1956, entitled "The Vagabond King". I've seen the '56 version, which was filmed in Technicolor and is 15min. shorter, plus allowance for the musical numbers further reduces the time available for the story. Preston Sturges wrote the present version, and Frank Lloyd directed it. The plot concerns the conflict between the king of France: Louis XI(Basil Rathbone), and Duke Charles of the large, nearly independent, province of Burgundy. An army from the Burgundians has laid siege to Paris for some time, and is waiting for the mass of people to get so hungry that they depose Louis, and surrender to the Burgundians. Thus, the commoners of Paris are prepared to support the Burgundians should they succeed in entering the city. That is, until poet, thief, and murderer, Francois Villon convinces them that if they instead support Louis' troops when the Burgundians enter the city, they can defeat the Burgundians, they will again be able to trade with the outside world. This is, in fact, what ensues, after Villon, as the Lord Constable, opens the royal food stores for the rabble to pillage. While we are waiting for this to happen, attention is focused on the opposing adversarial and cooperative relationships between Villon and Louis. Villon has displeased Louis by claiming(in the unknown presence of Louise) that he, himself, could do a lot better job of governance. Also, he led a raid on some crown food stores. However, Villon did expose and kill the traitor: the then Lord Constable; the second most powerful official in Paris. On the one hand, Louis wants to hang Villon. On the other hand, he wants to make him the new Lord Constable, so that he can come to appreciate the difficulties of ruling. Thus, Louis decides to make him the Constable until the Burgundian menace is decided, then hang him. However, after Villon's plan against the Burgundians works, Louise softens a bit and changes his sentence to permanent banishment from Paris. As a sideshow, Villon develops a romantic relationship with Lady Katherine(Frances Dee), she not suspecting that he is of underclass origins. Villon also has a thing going with tavern wench Huguette(Ellen Drew). These 2 women represent the polar extremes of Villon's character, as a courtly poet and temporary high official, or as a common thief, fraternizing with other riffraff. He quotes a Villon poem to Lady Katherine, beginning with "If I were king"A major believability problem with the above scenario is that Villon's only evident means of hiding his true identity as the Lord Constable is growing a moustache. Thus, those who know him as Villon should easily recognize him as Lord Constable!In one of the more bizarre scenes, as the Lord Constable, Villon tries his associates involved in the royal food stuffs robbery. Instead of sentencing them to some draconian punishment, he gives each a number of gold coins taken from the previous subject on trial!Coleman is OK as Villon, but I think the much younger Errol Flynn would have been more dynamic. Unfortunately, he was contracted to the wrong studio, and probably was playing Robin Hood for Warner at this time. The similarities between Villon and Robin Hood are evident, despite one being a city dweller and the other a forest dweller.So, which do I prefer: this version or the '56 version? Probably, the '56 version, with its music and Technicolor. However, the 2 are sufficiently different in their details that a viewing of both might be warranted if you like the basic story. See it on YouTube.

MartinHafer François Villon lived during the 15th century in Paris. He was one of the most famous writers of his age and was also something of a rogue...though exactly how criminal his activities were in real life is a bit vague today. Regardless, his reputation has lived on and he's been immortalized in more than a dozen and a half films-- stretching from the silent days to today. A couple of his most famous portrayals were in "If I Were King" (1920) and "Beloved Rogue" (1927) and this 1938 film is probably the most famous of the talking films about the guy. But, since his exact history and nature is vague (we're not even sure how or when he died), the films obviously are mostly fiction.When the film begins, Louis XI (Basil Rathbone) is in trouble. His capital city is surrounded and his people are beginning to starve. But instead of focusing on this directly, the king decides to sneak out of the palace to spy on the people. He suspects they are all disloyal jerks. He comes upon Villon and his associates and instead of killing them, Villon entertains him with his rather disloyal and bold comments. Plus, Villon helps the King to realize that his trusted aid is actually a spy. Bizarrely, the King rewards Villon by making him one of the most powerful men in the land. Sadly, he later learn that the King only will let him have this job for one week.When this film debuted, it was obviously well thought of because it received four Oscar nominations. The only major nomination was for Basil Rathbone. I thought his performance was a bit over the top, but tastes change and his scene-chewing was popular at the time. I thought his makeup was really interesting...and VERY heavy. I think when seen today, the film comes off a bit more poorly mostly because the story is utterly ridiculous and audiences today are likely looking for more realism. Not a terrible film by any means but a bit on the silly side.

vincentlynch-moonoi This is my least favorite of all the Ronald Colman talkies, and I consider myself a huge fan of Colman. But, at least through the early parts of the film, this is not the Colman most of us want to see -- handsome, suave, sophisticated. Instead, until later in the film we have an unshaven and shabby figure...though of course, the voice shines through. So I will take "A Tale Of Two Cities", "The Prisoner Of Zenda", "Lost Horizon", and especially "Random Harvest" (and several others of Colman's films) over this one.Yet, I must admit that, perhaps, this is as good acting Colman does in any of his films...because early on it is so against character. Here, Colman plays François Villon -- a real (and popular) 15th-century French poet who disappeared in 1463 after banishment. Google describes him as a "ne'er-do-well who was involved in criminal behavior and got into numerous scrapes with authorities, Villon wrote about some of these experiences in his poems". No one claims this film is an accurate biopic of Villon, but it loosely follows a tale about him and King Louis XI. It's my impression that Colman had a great deal of fun with his depiction of the rapscallion.I'm not usually a fan of Basil Rathbone, but his performance here is superb...perhaps one of his very best. So good as the King, that if you don't know it's Rathbone, it won't occur to you! Other supporting character include Frances Dee as a lady-in-waiting whom Villon falls in love with, Ellen Drew as Villon's sort-of girlfriend (and wench), and C.V. France as Father Villon. Henry Wilcoxon is interesting as Captain of the Watch -- a type of role he played later in "The Ten Commandments". All these supporting actors do their jobs in this film, but none are particularly outstanding. The multi-untalented Sidney Toler is also here in a small part as the owner of a tavern.The production is a handsome one, with quite a few relatively elaborate sets.As the film proceeded, I got more and more into it, and more and more into Colman's performance. Please do see for yourself. It's definitely worth watching, and although far from my favorite Colman picture, it's on my DVD shelf.

Varlaam This is a legendary story about François Villon, the mediaeval French poet and adventurer probably best known in English for his line, « Mais où sont les neiges d'antan? » / "But where are the snows of yesteryear?" Some may recognize the line from Joseph Heller's Catch-22 take-off, "Where are the Snowdens of yesteryear?"As I first began watching this, my immediate reaction was, "What an obvious attempt to cash in on The Hunchback of Notre Dame!", the film whose look and feel most closely resemble this one. But my chronology was backwards. The Laughton Hunchback is 1939. If you have ever seen the Chaney Hunchback from 1923, you may have been struck by how different many of the characterizations are from the more familiar version, especially that of the King. The 1923 French King is a nasty piece of work, just the sort of thinly disguised Napoleon III that Victor Hugo would conceive of. So where did the doddering but dear-hearted 1939 King played by sweet old Harry Davenport come from then? Well, that's easy. From Basil Rathbone's King in this film. They even look the same!Rathbone, by the way, is completely unrecognizable. If he's played an impish character elsewhere, I've never seen it. He gets most of Preston Sturges's best and most typical lines of dialogue.Sturges is the reason I was watching the film in the first place. Telltale signs are everywhere in the script, but we definitely do not get effervescent dialogue issuing forth from every mouth the way we expect from the later, classic Sturges films.I am not a great fan of Ronald Colman ordinarily but he brings a lot of spirit to his part, even if he doesn't have quite the dash of an Errol Flynn. But he does have a lot to do with this film's overall success.Frances Dee demonstrates once again that she is quite probably the best-looking American actress of the 1930's, although she has all the acting prowess of an Andie MacDowell. (If you insist on talent with your set decoration, then you probably would have preferred to see Paulette Goddard playing the part of the lady-in-waiting who catches Villon's eye.)