Jeanskynebu the audience applauded

Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

Doomtomylo a film so unique, intoxicating and bizarre that it not only demands another viewing, but is also forgivable as a satirical comedy where the jokes eventually take the back seat.

Portia Hilton Blistering performances.

jacobjohntaylor1 This is one scary movie AHHHHHHHHHHHH!. If does not scary you no movie will. Fright (1985) is better. Fright II (1988) is also better. Fright (2011) is also better. This not a sequel. It is a remake. Is a great movie. It has a great story line. It also has great acting. It also has great special effects. If it does not scary you no movie will. It is very scary. AHHHHHHHH! It is scarier then The Exorcist. That is not easy to do. It is a very scary movie. It is scarier then A Nightmare on elm street and that is not easy to do. It is scarier then Friday the 13th V a new beginning and that is not easy to do. It will scary you. It is a very scary movie. It will scary you.

Destroyer Wod Honestly i clicked the spoiler box mostly because i am about to tell you that if you saw the original Fright Night, or even just the 2011 remake with Collin Farrel, well you saw this movie pretty much.First of all its not a bad movie. There some special effects that could use some work at times (while others are pretty good) but other than that, i would say mostly everything in this movie is very decent production wise for a low budget DTV. The problem is, its just another remake of Fright Night from 1985. Don't take the "2" in title in consideration, its not a sequel at all, not even to the remake.For example I spit on your grave 2 was pretty much a retelling of the remake, but it had different characters. Its one of those sequel that ditch the first movie characters and tell a very similar story as the first one but with slight difference. Fright Night 2 New Blood kinda do the same but use the same characters from the original and remake, only changing Jerry the male vampire for a "Gerri" female version. There is another slight change as now its not just a regular vampire but "Elisabeth Battory" herself. The problem is, this slight change does not affect much on how the movie flow. The same events as in the first movie appear almost in the same exact orders.So as i said above the production is good, and ultimately the movie is not bad to watch at all, its a decent time, but its like somebody saw both the original, its sequel and the remake, and decided to do some kind of mash up of the 3 with his own vision, yet trying to remain truthful to the original, maybe a bit too much actually considering it was already remade 2 years before being also very close to the original. Don't get me wrong, i like when a remake stay truthful to its original, but when a remake was done 2 years before also staying close to its original, i feel its just too soon. It was even for me watching it in 2017.But ultimately if you never saw any of the Fright Night movies, i would say this one is as valid as the other ones. I prefer the Farrel remake a bit more because i prefer the vampire neighbour set up rather than the exchange student one, and Peter Vincent was not only better portrayed but also more present in the movie.

kdhbi42 I agree that this movie is a waste of Jaime Murray. The first Fright Night remake was OK and had enough star power to get by, but this one just didn't pull me in. They should have paid for at least one more recognizable face for Peter Vincent's role. The fact that they turned him into a ghost hunting whoremonger instead of a goofy late night movie host doesn't help either. If you watch horror movies for blood and random nudity then you won't be completely disappointed. I can usually handle bad movies with unlikeable casts, but this movie has horrible camera effects. Anytime something is supposed to be scary the screen flashes for a ridiculous amount of time and it gave me a migraine.

Brandon Stephens As everyone who knows me, I AM quite anal when it comes to remakes...esp. in the horror genre. That being said, when I first heard about FN2 needless to say I wasn't thrilled esp if it was going to be anything close to the debaughtery that was Fright Night (2011). In 2011, Marti Noxon's script was presented to us as a remake of the 1985 Cult Classic with starred Colin Farrell & Christopher Mintz-Plasse. IMHO, Both were miscasted, Jerry was more of a sociopath/rapist type who was turned into a vampire & Christopher Mintz-Plasse just CAN'T act which completely ruined the film for me.That being said, when the Part 2 remake came out I expected the same...Thank the gods I can say I was wrong....DEAD WRONG! This film was bloody amazing, from the unknown cast members that impressed the hell outta me (esp. the "evil ed" character such a improvement over Plasse's portrayal) , the opening sequence that started out with a great scare & a hell of a opening title sequence all the way to the location changes & the twists at the end. The part I enjoyed most about it was they actually took time into details about certain characteristics of our "Vampire Friend's powers and the nice lil "hat tips" they took & made their own from the original & the 1988 sequel.This film has enough scares, blood, & nudity to make any fan of the Vampire Mythos happy. I myself can not wait to watch it again, & the best part is it IS a stand alone film, even though it's a so called sequel & a remake of a remake. I Highly Recommend this movie if you have the chance.