Spoonatects Am i the only one who thinks........Average?

Borserie it is finally so absorbing because it plays like a lyrical road odyssey that’s also a detective story.

WillSushyMedia This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.

Tobias Burrows It's easily one of the freshest, sharpest and most enjoyable films of this year.

The Movie Diorama When a franchise like 'Final Destination' takes an idea and utilises the same narrative structure throughout all of the sequels, you can't help but feel cheated by Death himself. However, you know what they all say *cue London accent* "if it ain't broke, don't fix it...init". This third instalment is more of the same. A group of friends cheat death from a freak accident involving a rollercoaster, they each slowly die in other accidents in the sequential order they would've died if they stayed on the ride. If you've seen its predecessors then you know exactly what you are getting into. Non-existent character development, a predictable plot and a series of absolute convenient accidents that are timed so precisely that you just have to admire the creativity involved. These accidents rely on so many components falling into place, whether it be a shelf locking two temperature rising sun beds together or an unmanned truck rolling down a hill and accurately slotting into a drive-thru, that actually they no longer become surprising. Unlike the first film, they aren't unexpected all. Death has clearly meticulously planned these gruesome scenes for our pleasure, so I thank him for that. Aside from that, this film has no substance whatsoever. The characters theorise the plot's structure before the first freak accident as they try to warn others that they are next in line, leaving no excitement or thrills to be had. At the narrative's core, it becomes predictably boring. That's certainly not Wong's fault who does showcase some excellent directing techn...wait, he wrote this too? Well, in that case it is his fault. The franchise's structure has now run its course. Inventive but lacking in substance and thrills. If only the producers had a premonition in 2009, we wouldn't have had even worse sequels. Oh, before I forget, what I will say is that I will never ever ever go on a sun bed. That scene scarred me for life when I was younger...or should I say, it was burnt into my mind...

frusterboi At the beginning when she had her first premonition Frankie dropped the camcorder which made the roller coaster wreck ...if he got off in real life how did the roller coaster wreck if you didn't drop the camcorder...?

sol- After a premonition allows her to save her friends from a fatal roller-coaster crash, a teenager becomes convinced that Death still has a plan to get them in this third film in the 'Final Destination' franchise. The writing-directing team of Glen Morgan and James Wong return to the helm here (after the reigns to Part Two were given elsewhere) and they deliver several memorable novelty deaths, with a tanning salon sequence sticking out in a particular. The overall film though feels like a missed opportunity for Morgan and Wong who do not delve any deeper into the mythology of how Death works, why certain individuals get premonitions and the seemingly sadistic need of Death to make the experience as gruesome as possible. Morgan and Wong do, however, add an additional element of certain photographs that allow the protagonists to predict the ways their surviving friends will later perish - but then this only really furthers the mystery and suspense rather than the mythology behind the series. That said, a scene in which they enter a gym and spot several different possible ways in which their friend could die (in accordance with his photograph) comes with a deliciously dark comedic streak. Mary Elizabeth Winstead is also as appealing as ever, however, this third entry sorely lacks the twist connections to Part One that made the second film such a memorable experience.

LeonLouisRicci The Roller Coaster Opening is a Disappointment considering, for one, it's a Roller Coaster, and two, the opening Highway Scene in the Second Movie was so Good. There is one Death Scene that is so Reminiscent of a similar Scene in the Second Movie that it comes off as Horribly Ho-Hum. Finally, the Ending is very very Unworthy of the Franchise cleverness and leaves the Movie with a Credit Roll from an Ending that was Decidedly Dull.Other than those Three Letdowns this is another Guilty Pleasure for Blood-Lusters and is a Numbered Franchise Cash-In that is by the Numbers. The Cliché is "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Most Bottom Line Series Films follow that bit of Advice in Their Popular Popcorn Movies. So here We Go again.It is Surprising and a Treat when once in a while Audiences are Offered a New Twist with Their candy corn. But all of You Final Destination Fans have to Wait For Number Four to see If that happens. because although this was Made by James Wong and Glenn Morgan that were Behind the Original, there Simply is Nothing Original here.