Decision at Sundown

1957 "At last the search was over..."
6.8| 1h18m| en| More Info
Released: 10 November 1957 Released
Producted By: Producers-Actors Corporation
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A man and his partner arrive at a small Western town to kill its most powerful man because the former blames him for his wife's death.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Starz

Director

Producted By

Producers-Actors Corporation

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Claysaba Excellent, Without a doubt!!
Acensbart Excellent but underrated film
BeSummers Funny, strange, confrontational and subversive, this is one of the most interesting experiences you'll have at the cinema this year.
Erica Derrick By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.
TheLittleSongbird While the western genre is not my favourite one of all film genres (not sure which one is my favourite due to trying to appreciate them all the same), there is a lot of appreciation for it by me. There are a lot of very good to great films, with the best work of John Ford being notable examples.In the late 50s, starting in 1956 with 'Seven Men from Now' and right up to 1960 with 'Comanche Station', lead actor Randolph Scott collaborated with director Budd Boetticher in seven films. For me, 1957's 'Decision at Sundown' is one of their weakest, even a strong contender for their weakest. By all means it is a long way from terrible, it has a lot of great elements and is actually pretty decent. It just isn't in the same league as the wonderful 'Seven Men from Now' and 'The Tall T' and doesn't have enough of what made those two so good.Starting with the strengths, while not the best-looking of their outings, being smaller in scale and slightly too compact in its setting, 'Decision at Sundown' still looks pleasing. It is very nicely filmed, with some nice colour and atmosphere, and handsomely designed, it just lacks the visual grandeur of their best collaborations. The music has presence and fits nicely, while not being intrusive.Boetticher directs efficiently and mostly the film goes at a pace that isn't pedestrian. Numerous parts are suspenseful and fun, with some well choreographed action and some moral complexity. The ending is unusual and unexpected, and very effective. Scott brings likeability, charisma and intensity to his role and he is well supported by Karen Steele (oozing glamour and charm), Noah Beery Jr (enjoying himself immensely and having the best of the fun moments), John Archer (nice authority) and Andrew Duggan (suitably snake-like).However, Valerie French is rather bland and colourless in an underwritten role and lacking the charm and sometimes touching chemistry of Steele. John Carroll underplays his fairly one-dimensional villain, he's no Lee Marvin, Richard Boone or Claude Akins.The script is too wordy, lacking the meat and tautness of the scripts of the best Scott/Boetticher films, and can preach and be too basic to make the most of its complex themes. There is not enough depth to the characters, with only Scott's hero being developed enough and even then his motivation should have been explored more and more gripping. The story has a lot of great moments, but there is also some credibility straining, overload of simplicity and lack of tautness.In conclusion, decent but had the potential to be much better. 6/10 Bethany Cox
jazerbini In my opinion this is the film that Scott should not have done. The script is bad. Scott lives a husband who was betrayed by his wife years ago and seeks revenge the man responsible for it. The film escapes the traditional western line where the hero always has some dignity. Scott's character is a disoriented. Into the church in a way completely meaningless and then hides in a warehouse, taking his friend to death. Their actions do not make sense, despite being shown in history as having changed the lives of everyone in the community. All characters are caricatured, it does not seem that may exist. "Decision at Sundown" does not have the same strength of other Boetticher films and finishes disconcertingly again with Scott disoriented and drunk. I'm sorry those who admire the film, but I consider him very weak. Disappointing.
runamokprods A far more interesting and morally complex film than I expected after the first 15 minutes. Randolph Scott stars as a cowboy come to take revenge on a man who wronged him, a man who is now the kingpin of the town of Sundown. But all the characters reveal more layers than our first introductions lead us to expect, and issues of right and wrong end up as more subjective and complex than we think of in most westerns. Not quite a great movie – there are flaws; weak supporting performances, a misogynistic attitude, some unsuccessful comic relief, some stretching of credulity, etc. But a movie that was much more striking than I had any expectation of.
Robert J. Maxwell "Doc, if you'd been a bartender as long as I have you wouldn't expect so much from the human race." Good line. Thought provoking. Was Thomas Hobbes a bartender? Randolph Scott rides into Sundown with his pal, Noah Beery Jr. It's a big day in Sundown. Tate Kimbrough, who runs the place, is getting married to Karen Steele. Lucky him. But Scott interrupts the proceedings by speaking up when the preacher, Richard Deacon, asks if any man knows why these two should not be joined together. Well, Scott has a reason, although it doesn't emerge until later. Kimbrough had a fling with Scott's wife before she done killed herself.Following the interruption, everybody in town seems to take off after Scott and Beery, shooting and hollering. The pair take shelter in a stable while bullets whiz and zip through the windows. "Come on out!", yell the townsfolk. The doc is allowed to enter the bunker and tries to talk sense to Scott but Scott is a man of integrity. A visit by Steele doesn't change his mind either. He gets even more integrity when his buddy Beery is shot down in the street while unarmed. It makes the cheese more binding.It's Randolph Scott and Budd Boetticher alright but unfortunately a lesser example of their work together. Boetticher was at his best with the stolid Scott hero and a flashy villain, like Lee Marvin or Richard Boone. This is a town movie, full of community involvement, and Boetticher wasn't interested in that. His subject was always two men who share a certain code facing off with one another. The fact that he'd been a professional matador in Mexico was a reflection of these values.John Carroll is not a complex villain. He's pretty much normal. The community, for all its occasional drunkenness, is dull. The music is dull. The wardrobe is dull. The location shooting is limited to a studio ranch. The dialog lacks the sparkle and freshness that Burt Kennedy brought to some of their collaborations, in one of which a character says, "Ma'am, if you'd of been my woman I'd have come for you, even if I'd of died in the doin' of it." Compared to some of the minor gems that Scott, Boetticher, and the rest of the team produced, this is lesser stuff.