Stevecorp Don't listen to the negative reviews

Casey Duggan It’s sentimental, ridiculously long and only occasionally funny

Deanna There are moments in this movie where the great movie it could've been peek out... They're fleeting, here, but they're worth savoring, and they happen often enough to make it worth your while.

Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

herbjones Tom's father is served dinner by the cook, Sing Fat, who has poisoned the meal, especially the pudding. The father is reluctant to eat the food, although he does not know Sing Fat poisoned it. After much encouragement by Sing Fat to eat the pudding, after Sing Fat leaves the room, the father gives the pudding to the dog, which eats it as the father decides to eat some of the other food. Suddenly, the dog dies, the father grabs his heart as though he is dying from the poisoned food too, and a masked person dressed in black enters and shoot the old man as he appears to be dying already from the poisoned food. Eventually, the shooter is unmasked after he is killed and is labeled as the murderer, but no one seems to be interested in the role that the cook played in the death of the father. A question of law: Would the father have died of poison but for the shot fired the masked killer?

JohnHowardReid Not copyrighted 1935 by Beacon Productions, inc. No New York opening. U.S. release through First Division. Release dates and original running time unknown. About 55 minutes.SYNOPSIS: A crippled rancher sends for his ne'er-do-well son when he finds himself hemmed in by "enemies", including a sinister Chinese cook who poisons his dog, "Rusty". COMMENT: A substantial improvement over "Cowboy Holiday", this entry has a superior script. In fact, it's not actually a western at all, despite obligatory buck-jumping (via obvious stock shots) and a saloon fight (interspersed with myriads of odd close-ups) sequences.This movie is actually a suspenseful mystery thriller, using (by M. & A. Alexander standards) some extraordinarily large indoor sets, plus some fast chase action and stunt-work in real but most effective locations. The identity of the killer came as a real surprise to me. Acting level is high. Williams is reasonably personable, the heroine is most attractive, whilst Lafe McKee and Bud Osborne turn in their usual ultra-reliable portrayals of neighboring rancher and hero's sidekick, respectively. The director makes the most of Harry Forbes' moody photography with lots of menacing shots of the cloaked killer in the rain.

MattyGibbs Big Boy Williams goes home to find his dad murdered and tries to uncover who killed him. A low budget western mainly set indoors. The plot is ropey and contrived with cartoon villains at every turn. Big Boy Williams character doesn't come across as the smartest tool in the box. His acting, in this anyway, is average at best, though he does at least live up to his nickname. There isn't much action or acting on show here though I'm pretty sure the film must hold the world record for the number of scenes of doors being opened and walked through. The one good thing about the film is the reveal of the killer who I didn't guess.Even for a minor western this isn't very good. Even at the time I'm sure the lack of action would have meant this wasn't high on anyone's favourite film list.

Moonie-4 This movie is a classic "MST3K" movie. Nonsensical cuts and segues make following this movie nearly impossible. This movie contains, bar none, the worst bar fight in the history of movies (ironically, Guinn "Big Boy" Williams was in the classic western "Dodge City", which contains one of the best barroom brawls in movie history), with disappearing people, props, and cuts in action that follow no form of chronological continuum. That said, I can only say that I wish I had this classic clunker on tape.