Mjeteconer Just perfect...

Claysaba Excellent, Without a doubt!!

AnhartLinkin This story has more twists and turns than a second-rate soap opera.

Dana An old-fashioned movie made with new-fashioned finesse.

adonis98-743-186503 Novelist Catherine Tramell is once again in trouble with the law, and Scotland Yard appoints psychiatrist Dr. Michael Glass to evaluate her. Though, like Detective Nick Curran before him, Glass is entranced by Tramell and lured into a seductive game. I love the original Basic Instict cause it was a sharp and terrific thriller but Basic Instict 2 is a big disgrace to fans of the original. The acting and the dialogue is horrendous also except David Thewlis who tries a little bit everyone else has the emotion of a robot and even Sharon Stone tries way much to get back into the shoes of Tramell and she fails to deliver. I knew that the film was going to be awful just from that opening scene. Basic Instict 2 is a sequel that no one asked and should have never been made in the first place. (0/10)

Kirpianuscus it is very easy and funny and cool to criticize this film. first support - the comparison with the original. than - the expectations. too high. in fact, it is a mistake to make a second part . but this mistake could be reduced if you ignore the original as standard. if you do, you have a thriller. not great but decent. chaotic and predictable but the presence of Sharon Stone and Charlotte Rampling are a reasonable compensation. so, it is an error to define it as trash. it is a decent thriller, not the best but far to be the worst, it is not Paul Verhoeven but a nice try to recreate his universe. so, Basic Instinct 2. and this is all.

dantonstl I tried to get into watching this before. I was disappointed, and I thought that there were a lot of bondage scenes that I fell asleep through the first time I tried to watch this. I was semi excited to send this sucky film to an old person in the mail right away, whether it was to Tallahassee, seattle or even Orlando...but I realized that it was a long movie that basically catches the sick beauty in Sharon stones face. I don't think anyone would love to own this movie. and though other reviews tattle on the plain David morriseys position within this film, I think that he was hardly ever acting at all, and if anything might have been reacting and being set up as he was. The sex scenes were brief, and Michell Pfeiffer talks dirtier in the fabulous baker brothers...and as far as her sexy body, I did not get to see the the first girl this David morrisey was having sex with after he almost got intimate with Sharon at a dinner party. I hate this movie...

OllieSuave-007 Released 14 years after the original, Novelist Catherine Tramell (Sharon Stone) returns in this sequel, and is caught within the law again, this time in London. Psychiatrist Dr. Michael Glass (David Morrissey) is assigned by the Scotland Yard to evaluate her, but lured into Tramell's seductive game.While the first film blends in sexually with mesmerizing mystery, thrills and suspense, Director Michael Caton-Jones gave this film more of a slick and sleazy soap-opera style story, leaving out much of the mystery, suspense and intrigue. What you have is a movie with over-the-top raunchy scenes, cheesier dialog, overboard drama, and an uninspiring cast, though Stone can still pull-off a cunning femme fatale portrayal.The plot goes at a pretty swift pace, but I've found the story and the acting weren't as simulating as in the first film.Grade D