Autumn

2009 "Silence is your savior."
3.2| 1h50m| R| en| More Info
Released: 24 October 2009 Released
Producted By: Renegade Motion Picture
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

The virus came so fast no one had time to prepare. Before the day was over, entire towns were decimated, and large cities became monumental tombs. Left with nothing but fading hope and the will to live, reclusive software consultant Michael (Dexter Fletcher) and temperamental mechanic Carl (Dickon Tolson) lead a small group of survivors into the country in hopes of riding out the coming winter. But now the decaying victims of the plague are reanimating, growing more smart and vicious with each passing day. Now, the only hope for the survival of the human race is Phillip (Carradine), a man who refused to leave the city, and has somehow avoided becoming food for the flesh-eating masses.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Renegade Motion Picture

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

SnoReptilePlenty Memorable, crazy movie
FuzzyTagz If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.
Kinley This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows
Candida It is neither dumb nor smart enough to be fun, and spends way too much time with its boring human characters.
Páiric O'Corráin Autumn: In the Fall comes The Fall. A Plague/Virus strikes, people fall down vomiting blood. A small band of survivors gather together, includig an angry clown in full make up, The dead rise but only shamble about,Dissension among the living results in some leaving the city. Eventually three take refuge in a mansion and life seems good as they even get a generator going. But the dead are evolving: attracted by noise they now are more aggressive, becoming typical fast Zombies.David Carradine has an interesting supporting role as an isolated survivor. Adapted from a novel by David Moody, haven't read it but i've read his Hater trilogy where a virus/plague turns people into still human raging killers. The book may be better than this film which is so-so. 5/10
brentcox-830-471384 We watched Autumn years ago and still use it as the yardstick by which we measure other bad movies. For us, "Autumn" has basically become shorthand for"a very, very bad film". I can't muster the psychic energy to care enough to review this stinker, but I'll give one quick example of the bad writing and low budget that plague the movie. At one point the characters build a fence to keep out the zombies. The characters even say any fence built for that purpose would have to be really strong. When we then see the fence with hordes of zombies pushing against it, the fence is just a cheap, waist-high thing, what appears to be a sand fence, those little fences used to keep sand on beaches in place, and definitely not strong enough to stop a single person, much less a horde of shambling zombies.
Kingkitsch Somehow, I watched "Autumn" since it appeared in the streaming service I use. While studiously avoiding all zombie flicks for a long while, it seemed that this incredibly bad movie might finally offer something different. I was wrong. Really wrong."Autumn" is (and owes everything) to a lost and forgotten flick by Arch Oboler made in 1951, "Five". Ostensibly one of the first, if not THE first film to speculate the aftermath of nuclear war. "Five" eschews the dead in favor of the living, as "Autumn" tries to do. Survivors of a global tragedy pick up the pieces and try to go on. "Five"is a shrewd little movie, only showing the remains of the unlucky in one riveting scene. "Autumn" attempts to copy this idea, by focusing on the survivors of some kind of viral epidemic; the resulting zombies from the holocaust are kept at bay until the movie runs out of steam and then attempts to scare the viewer with some eat-em-up action. The climax of this foolish exercise from Canada is ripped off completely from "Night of the Living Dead" and reaches some ambiguous ending that you can't bring yourself to care about. The end titles are pretty and seem to have some kind of medical message about the viral epidemic by showing microscopic somethings wiggling around in psychedelic colors. The living protagonists in "Autumn" are not as smart as they appear to be at first. If they were smart, there would be no movie. We wait around for nearly two hours until something happens that could have been avoided. The time period here is murky, as autumn moves into winter. How many winters? Why do the two male leads never shave, yet their facial hair stays the same trendy stubble/neck beard? No mention is made of exactly how the three survivors live other than raiding for supplies in a conveniently nearby town, but in a burst (the only burst) of deviating from the norm, not one of the two men hit on the lone woman. These three idiots know that sound attracts the undead, yet they lounge around in the "safe" house eating snacks and watching movies at night. Evidently, the twist here is that in the beginning the undead are just "meatsuits" that wander around rotting off the bone, but by the end of this exercise in stupidity, they're full-fledged Romero zoms looking to make fajitas out of the dummies who should have left instead of holing themselves up in an isolated farmhouse. Gee, that doesn't sound familiar at all, does it?Skip this junk as I should have. It's slow, attempts to be meaningful, and ends up being the same as every other zombie movie out there. Oh yeah, a puppy gets eaten by the undead, which is not something anyone wants to see. A cheap gimmick that pretty much sums up the fear factor in this stupid movie from the Great White North. Also, a slobbering clown appears to stoke your clownaphobia. No more zombies!!
Paul Magne Haakonsen It was with some expectation that I bought this movie - yeah I actually paid money for this garbage. I had heard nothing buy praise for Moody's novel, which I also bought, but haven't read yet. And truth be told, now that I have seen the movie, I dread opening the book in fear that it will be equally worthless.I had expected somewhat more of an ordinary zombie movie from this, I didn't really buy into the thing that was going on with the re-animated dead and how they were treated by the survivors. That was just a tad too unconventional for me.Storywise, it seemed a bit too jumpy, and there wasn't much of a structured linear storyline going on. I actually fell asleep during the movie and ended up turning it off, as it was just that uneventful and uninteresting.As for the cast and their acting, well most of the people were doing adequately, though the dialogue was somewhat crippling at times, and there were some performances of acting that was quite bad to look at. However, I will say that there was a very every-day-feel to the cast and the way that they talked."Autumn" didn't sell its goods to me on any level, it was uninteresting already from just a few minutes into it, and then it was an uphill struggle for it to get any ground and win me over. In the end, the movie lost and I gave up on it. For a zombie aficionado like myself, "Autumn" was a huge disappointment.There are far better zombie movies available on the market, even a good handful of the low-budget movies fared better than "Autumn". It was a shame, because Moody was so praised for his novels.

Similar Movies to Autumn