A Matter of Faith

2014
3.7| 1h28m| en| More Info
Released: 17 October 2014 Released
Producted By: Five & Two Pictures
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A Christian girl, Rachel Whitaker (Jordan Trovillion) goes off to college for her freshman year and begins to be influenced by her popular Biology professor (Harry Anderson) who teaches that evolution is the answer to the origins of life. When Rachel’s father, Stephen Whitaker (Jay Pickett) senses something changing with his daughter, he begins to examine the situation and what he discovers catches him completely off guard. Now very concerned about Rachel drifting away from her Christian faith, he tries to do something about it!

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Five & Two Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

NekoHomey Purely Joyful Movie!
Konterr Brilliant and touching
Curapedi I cannot think of one single thing that I would change about this film. The acting is incomparable, the directing deft, and the writing poignantly brilliant.
Erica Derrick By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.
nadinesalakovv Movie Plot: After she is taught the theory of evolution in her biology class at university, a young Christian woman begins to drift away from her faith.Review: As a strong in faith Christian i really enjoyed this movie. It is realistic and focuses on the evolution vs creationism debate. The acting is decent and the film tackles the realism of being weak in faith, bitterness, lack of knowledge and faith. "A Matter of Faith" is a movie that hardcore Christians, evolutionists and hardcore atheists will enjoy.
aYoomanBean Or maybe it's anti-Christian propaganda. The acting was fine with me, the visuals okay... but the content was ridiculous. So ridiculous, with the non-Christian side portrayed so unfairly, that I can't believe the intentions behind the film were honest. It's disgusting.If you want to learn something, watch a science documentary or a real debate. If you're looking for a feel-good movie with a near-total disregard for reality, you've found it.The atheist professor implies that eggs are "simpler life forms" than chickens and that's why they came first. He says that the 1500m trackster in his class would have won the 1896 and 1904 Olympics because people were evolving to be faster. The "good Christian boy" of the film asks the main character if she believes the world came to be through evolution. And the "debate" hasn't even started yet...
Samuel N If you accept this as intended to be a debate about creationism and evolution, then you'll be really disappointing. It's horrible on the arguments on both sides.However, if you just enjoy the silliness of the whole thing, it is quite funny (not intended). True it's sad to think someone can go off to college and have a conniption every time the word "evolution" is mentioned. It can also be funny.If you take it serious, it's not really an "atheist" vs "christian" thing. My kids go to a Catholic school and are fully and accurately taught about evolution, and are also taught to interpret Genesis in a way consistent with evolution.
Landenbrook I cannot stand this movie. As a Christian myself I have my issues with Creationism. Even the Catholic faith support evolution, bla, bla, bla. Why I believe this movie is dangerous because it is cleverly done. It doesn't ultimately try to discredit Evolution. No, one could deal with facts. But it actually gives the impression that Creationism and Evolution have the same fact base and hence are equally "valid" since there would be ultimately no evidence for any of the two would have created life on earth - since nobody could witness. But Evolution has been able to deliver a full explanation. There will be most likely some details still wrong, but I believe (*please note this word here*) that it will be ultimately sorted out. Creationism only provides god as the ultimo ratio. No, these two approaches are not comparable. Btw, I thought the acting wasn't good neither.