ThedevilChoose When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

Nayan Gough A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

Geraldine The story, direction, characters, and writing/dialogue is akin to taking a tranquilizer shot to the neck, but everything else was so well done.

Fleur Actress is magnificent and exudes a hypnotic screen presence in this affecting drama.

SnoopyStyle David Swain (Kyle MacLachlan) is a successful lawyer with political aspirations and he decides to form an organization called the National Justice Project that sets out to help those who were wrongfully convicted. Charles Conti (Jason O'Mara) a former cop, is the one who investigates all of the cases along with some other volunteers. And once he has enough evidence that proves the person's innocence he gives it to Swain who in turn gets them out and hogs all the glory. Also staring Constance Zimmer and Marisol Nichols.It lasted 13 episodes. There was some complaints that it was a left wing propaganda where all criminals are just falsely accused. The story lines were definitely left leaning, and you've lost half the audience already. Otherwise, it's a good legal procedural show.

aerowester I watched this show every week since it debuted and I was always waiting to see if this week there would be opening credits instead of barely ten seconds of music, a background, and the title "In Justice".Overall, I really like the show. It was serious, but had its funny moments. The show had a great premise, it wasn't really like other crime dramas you see on television. Kyle MacLachlan and Jason O'Mara are excellent actors and the supporting cast is not bad either.It has not been on for the past couple of weeks, probably because its rating were not very good. It really is a good show and more people should watch it. I know that I would like to see it stay on the air, at least for the rest of the season, though I would like it to go on longer.

WandaXena I have watched In Justice since it aired and I can honestly say I have enjoyed every episode until the February 17, 2006 episode. I thought the whole show was saving the people who was wrongly convicted. If any episode worth saving an In Justed person this one was it. I think this episode would have made this show. Many people probably would have talked about this particular episode and show if this episode had turned out the way everyone and I do mean everyone wanted it too. I don't know why the show went with this ending but I think it was the wrong one. I thought shows was suppose to go forward to try to increase there audience but this episode I think made a step backward.

yossarian100 Here's a well done crime drama that focuses not on the primary victims of crime but on the secondary victims, those wrongly convicted. Jason O'Mara's emotionally driven investigative personality is what drives the show but Kyle MacLachlan's gonzo rich lawyer headline seeking eccentric character makes the show work. There are only two actors who could do this part and spin an entire show, Kyle MacLachlan and Oliver Platt. Either one is perfect casting. Not only do we get a tightly focused message here, we get a tightly focused message that's also very entertaining. The stories are easy to wrap your head around because they all begin with the ultimate underdog, someone who's situation appears hopeless. Who can't root for an underdog? IN JUSTICE is not just another crime drama, it's a crime drama with a heart, a message, and a sense of truth.