Evengyny Thanks for the memories!

Konterr Brilliant and touching

Console best movie i've ever seen.

CommentsXp Best movie ever!

Saiyan_Prince_Vegeta It is an interesting movie, but I didn't really understand what is the moral of the movie. However, some of the reviews here on IMDB can explain it a little better. This movie is definitely better for people who read the book and they will probably understand it better, however, as some people have pointed out here, it is probably about a vampire searching for meaning of eternal life.The movie nicely portrays old times, the decorations, costumes, scenery are quite nice. Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt acting are nice. The main actor in the movie is Brad Pitt. There were some confusing moments in the plot and I'm confused why the characters made certain decisions or certain things happened, so that's why I give it a 7, because even if you didn't read the book, you still should pretty much understand everything that happens. Great example are LOTR movies, where the story is explained quite well.

Bele Torso This movie is horrid...what is the appeal of someone who drinks blood? Sexual arousal not for ample breasts, but the veins in the neck of a black servant girl. Really? Disgusting. Any human being that enjoys this is highly disturbed and cannot admit it. Brad Pitt is so bad as an actor and looks horrible. In Kalifornia, a movie or two earlier, he excelled, but in this flop, he sucks. No reason he should have been cast but the appeal to market as high popularity grew.Cruise (the was pre-Scientology nonsense and insanity came out) was too dedicated to this role. Gave him a way to shed the good-guy image and dive into darkness. Nobody can claim taking these roles does not impact one's life. Working on Eyes Wide Shut was occultish and a freak fest he loved. These are movies that reveal the sinful state of mankind, have no edifying factor, add nothing to the human experience, but say a lot about depravity.

akoaytao1234 I watched this film with no preconception of what this film will be about (except for the obvious) or how good it is and I still somehow felt quite disappointed. As expected, it was a predictable Hollywood popcorn flick. It has its big stars and its pretty effects and that's about it. Though it was interesting how the gay subtext was tackled, other than that the film's script is beyond mediocre. I mean Pitt's role is not really salvageable. That character is beyond insufferable. On the other hand, Kirsten Dunst and Tom Cruise, in substantial roles, did their best to impress.Dunst left me with mixed feelings. She was impressive when she was playing as a youngster version of her role but as her character 'age', I did not see a change that I believe the character should have.Meanwhile, Tom Cruise was more impressive in his role. I mean he have the showiest role after all. It has the right amount of pizazz and motherly touch that his character imbued but it was nothing special. Overall, the film was just painfully OK and everything about leaves you wanting for more as nothing really leaves a big impression. [2.5/5]

Miguel Neto Interview with the Vampire: The Vampire Chronicles has an interesting premise, I cool the idea of ​​a vampire tells his story to a journalist, most unfortunately the film is only watchable, I found the tiring film, not pace suited me, the cast is excellent , Brad Pitt very well, Tom Cruise this great Stephen Rea, Kristen Dunst still young in this film, Christian Slater, Antonio Banderas and etc, the soundtrack is okay, the costumes are amazing, the look of the clothes is amazing, not to mention beautiful photography, surely the best thing in the film, the direction of Neil Jordan is competent, more Interview with the Vampire: the Vampire Chronicles is just an okay movie, with a barely tapped cast. Note 6.7