Wah-Wah

2006 "Every family has its own language."
6.7| 2h0m| R| en| More Info
Released: 12 May 2006 Released
Producted By: Reeleyes Film
Country: United Kingdom
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

Set at the end of the 1960s, as Swaziland is about to receive independence from United Kingdom, the film follows the young Ralph Compton, at 12, through his parents' traumatic separation, till he's 14.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Director

Producted By

Reeleyes Film

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Artivels Undescribable Perfection
TaryBiggBall It was OK. I don't see why everyone loves it so much. It wasn't very smart or deep or well-directed.
Sameer Callahan It really made me laugh, but for some moments I was tearing up because I could relate so much.
Tayyab Torres Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.
secondtake Wah-Wah (2005)It may seem like this story of a dysfunctional family is familiar, and just setting it in a new location (Swaziland, 1969) will perk it up. And that's partly true, both halves. It really is a television soap opera, and it really is interesting for its setting and subtle political backdrop.But it's so decently made, with sterling performances across the line, you can't help but give it a chance. Even when you think, oh no, not this, you will also think, ah, nicely done. Very moving. And funny. And beautiful.And that, oddly, is everything, which says something. The cast is easily read elsewhere (Gabriel Byrne and Emily Watson stand out for me). The director is a completely new name to me, Richard E. Grant, and it turns out he only has 84 movies to his credit--as an actor (including Henry and June and Dracula). This is his only role as director, and it should have encouraged him. With a more original script (which it must be confessed he also wrote), this would have made the sterling performances and great overall production rise to another level.As it is, a completely absorbing movie, being what it is, and for those who appreciate this kind of sometimes funny, sometimes moving melodrama.
artzau I've passed this one on the shelf a dozen times and happened to pick it up as my wife doesn't like dark comedy, shoot'em-ups or slap-stick. I knew it was a winner just seeing Gabriel Byrne, Miranda Richardson and Emily Watson. But, the story was excellent, young Nicholas Hoult was outstanding with the support of such talent like Julia Waters, Celia Imrie. Writer/Director Richard E. Grant has captured the petty intrigues and back-biting found in the British ex-pat colonial service of the 60s, along with the trysts, scandals and class distinction. The setting and depiction of the African scenes are breathtaking, albeit the focus is on the Brits in the process of returning this country to the Swazi. All in all, a great story, rife with human interest, fraught with human frailties and painted on a touching but not maudlin canvas and well worth watching.
bobgeorge1 Richard E Grant's film about his formative years being brought up in Swaziland is fascinating for both what it shows and what it conceals. It is a stunning portrayal of an only child brought up by feuding parents. It shows his parents turmoil in dealing with their required Upper Class Victorian behaviour - even though this is the 1960s - and their frustration at being unable to act their true feelings. It made sense to me of how people in authority who have to behave in such formalised ways to give their roles gravitas end up sacrificing their true desires. But desires come through. His mother turns to having affairs and his Father to alcoholism and the only child stuck in the middle of this is also dis-empowered. He is shuttled off to boarding school and the country of Swaziland and he each find their independence. But there's a real twist in this tale. My wife tells me that Richard E Grant has a brother. Can this be true? If so it means the film makes no sense. The whole basis of the film is the tugging Oedipul triad that destroys them all before each is reborn as is the country with a new identity. You'd better go see it too and see if you can work out why he left the 4th leg off the table?
thabakate2 Sitting in any American cinema audience, one is always aware that battle will have to be fought with the munchers, crunchers, cell phone brigade and plastic bag gang. Well done to Richard E Grant who silenced them all. Unlike many others, I held back my tears until the last five minutes but the view from his father's graveside undid me utterly. As the lights came on and I dabbed at my wet face, I realized that all around me people were doing exactly the same and I daresay hardly any of them had ever heard of Swaziland. I lived in Lesotho (Basutoland) at around the same time and the divisions between Black and White, traders and ex pats, Brits and South Africans were exactly the same. We all drank far too much and personal relationships were under a constant spotlight but it afforded us an extraordinary way of life that has now vanished completely. "Wah Wah" captured it all and my sincere thanks to Richard E Grant and his excellent cast for taking me back in time. We are now ordering the film and holding a "Wah Wah" party for all the homesick Southern Africans who have washed up on these far away shores. "Khotso Pula Nala". (Peace Rain and Prosperity).