Exoticalot
People are voting emotionally.
Whitech
It is not only a funny movie, but it allows a great amount of joy for anyone who watches it.
Allison Davies
The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
rivanerakaren
I was suprised, sometimes sequels aren't great but I really liked this, definitely give it a go.
rzemph
Yet another horror film that feels like it was made with a by-the-numbers horror-film kit for the intellectually challenged. Are we never to have another that isn't just the same collection of clichés served up like a cheap oily burger and chips in a gaudy cardboard box? The heard-it-a thousand-times-before music, the tired old camera angles, the groan-inducing characters, as two-dimensional as the computer graphics that lend to every scene that flat, video game quality we've come to hate so much: yes, they're all here yet again, folks. Electronically distorted whispers that swell on the soundtrack whenever a character is being haunted, glass-eyed dolls and mechanical toys, cobwebbed corridors and peeling wallpaper, and, of course, jump-scares galore. But are these hackneyed sounds and images really what a paying audience is meant to accept as horror cinema in the 21st century? When will the cinema industry outgrow this ghost-train garbage and actually put in the effort and artistry and creativity to come up with something original, atmospheric, thought-provoking and genuinely frightening to put on our screens? For real horror these days one must turn to the news.
svr-2200
The Woman in Black Angel of Death: Movie Review.The Woman in Black: Angel of Death is an okay type of fair horror movie with some creepy and scary elements. The movie has dark atmospheric tone and vibe and is visually stylish and sharp, but lacks the creepiness of the first part The Woman in Black film, still the movie has some visually dark and creepy sequences. The film lacks intensity and intriguing elements in it story because there is not much story. Main lead characters are dull and boring. The film lacks character development and there is very less feel of tension and scares. The story feels empty and undeveloped. The horror aspect of the movie seems hollow at certain points and has no deep or real impact. All over, its just a below average not so good horror film.(Please Note: That This Review represent only my professional point of view and my personal honest opinion about the film, and does not represent others. Thank You).
wnjbond-1
The original TV version was outstanding. This version was a sequel to the Hammer version starring Daniel Radcliffe.Too many scenes were so dark as to obscure what was happening. The general gloom reduced the atmosphere rather than adding to it.Scriptwriting lacked a clear dynamic. The original story by Susan Hill was a classic ghost story and provided a credible premise for the haunting. It should be possible to build on this, but unfortunately this sequel failed to do this. Ostensibly, all the ingredients were present, but... well, it takes more than an old neglected house and a bunch of wartime child evacuees to make a spooky film.Too episodic in plot to be effective. Overall short on tension and thrills.
