VividSimon Simply Perfect

FeistyUpper If you don't like this, we can't be friends.

Moustroll Good movie but grossly overrated

Sexyloutak Absolutely the worst movie.

Rich Wright Set on Christmas Eve, but don't expect any festive fun in this revenge thriller, which features Val Kilmer as an apparently innocent man who was beaten to death by six cops, and now he returns from beyond the grave to seek vengeance on those same lawmen. And whatdya know... They're the only people in the station that evening. All of his victims die in ways related to to the part they played in his demise, e.g the one who tied him up gets hanged with a rope, the one who beat him with the shovel is disemboweled with a spade... you know how it goes. These are some slow-witted officers though... they only start to try to kill him after the second victim croaks, and they finally figure out what is going on after the third dude gets wasted. I hear they're experts at donut rationing though...Kilmer may think he is scary with his random whistling and blank stare, but believe me... he isn't. He's like a fifth rate clone of Harry Powell from Night Of The Hunter. Sadly, the director disagrees... so we get lots of shots of his expressionless face performing three bars from Mozart's 'Death Mask'. This gets tedious real soon, but not as much as repeated flashbacks of his torture, or the abduction of the girl he was accused of killing. Is any of this necessary? Nope. The word 'padding' comes to mind. I also must bring up the bits near the end, where you get the feeling the scriptwriter just threw his pen away and said "Anything Goes". The deaths get REALLY stupid, the plots twists get REALLY desperate, and as for the deus ex machina (I've been waiting to use THAT term for a while) that saves the day... Well, let me sum it up for you. PUR-LEASE.Final thought: I bet Kilmer's wage took up more than half the budget. Just a hunch. 4/10

silasvalder Some people are just too stupid and too much into the critic wannabe role. You are an idiot for posting such negative reviews. 156 6.6% 10 ------------ are positive people that are able to enjoy good movies when they see one. 43 1.8% 9 ------------ are fans of giving 9's and not 10's 67 2.8% 8 ---------- are true film makers 139 5.9% 7 -------- have good critics but are resentful 213 9.0% 6-------- fans of twilight. 346 14.7% 5 --------- are teenagers. 390 16.5% 4 --------- where high with pot 337 14.3% 3 ---------where drinking cheap beer. 291 12.3% 2 -------- 291 are morons. 376 15.9% 1 --- 376 people are idiots

Spaceygirl : "The Traveler" is one of those films that starts very well and draws the audience to know more of the story. But as it progresses, about 40 minutes into the movie, the film begs you to be open-minded and to suck in all the stupidity it delivers. delivers. If you hate illogical horror, you better not see this film, especially since it delivers obscure moral lessons. It's also very (very, VERY!!) icky and violent....and the acting is AWFUL! (I told you Val Kilmer was dodgy Bronwyn!) It also suffers horribly from repetition, making it boring...and really Val Kilmer needs to give up acting now because he's embarrassing himself and WASTING OUR MONEY!! 1/10

mwr9993 A few twist that are some what predictable. Not quite as predictable as the other raters say. It definitely is a "B" grade movie.Yes, it is low budget and I am sorry to see Val in all these "B" movie roles. Graphic depictions are as you would expect in a "B" movie. If you are easily bored by a slightly slow set up, then you will miss out along the way. Sure there are twist that make you you think "What?". Other raters call it cheesy if they paid full theater price! One scene set up is missing a link that some may say messed up the flow. Don't get caught up on that. It is a "B" movie.I would not have paid full price for this when it was in the theater. If you like horror movies it is a must see to rent from the low priced movie machines.