The Patent Scam

2017 "Unraveling the Us Patent System and It's Trolls"
7.5| 1h50m| en| More Info
Released: 15 August 2017 Released
Producted By: Genesis Studios
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: https://www.thepatentscam.com/
Synopsis

The corruption runs deeper than you'd ever imagine. A multi-billion dollar industry you've never heard of. This is the world Patent Trolls thrive in: A world created for them by our own U. S. Patent system. You can be sued for clicking on a hyperlink, using your own scanner, or sharing your Wi-Fi! It sounds insane, but the reality is even crazier. Patent Trolls look for obvious ideas, patent them, and then sue anyone they claim is infringing on their idea. People's lives and businesses are being destroyed.. and they have no way out. “The Patent Scam” exposes the underbelly of this system, and the people that commit this practice.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Prime Video

Cast

Director

Producted By

Genesis Studios

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Images

  • Top Credited Cast
  • |
  • Crew

Reviews

Plustown A lot of perfectly good film show their cards early, establish a unique premise and let the audience explore a topic at a leisurely pace, without much in terms of surprise. this film is not one of those films.
Taha Avalos The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.
Ella-May O'Brien Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.
Quiet Muffin This movie tries so hard to be funny, yet it falls flat every time. Just another example of recycled ideas repackaged with women in an attempt to appeal to a certain audience.
fe-51393 This is a must watch documentary that shows you the corrupt state of the American patent system.It shows how patent trolls and often corrupt lawyers/judges milk the system, to force helpless victims out of a livelihood.I sincerely hope that the Congress will pass a bill that puts an end to this gross injustice.
malacite-98560 This I found to be a really good amateur documentary. It highlights the problems of the capitalist system very clearly. Lawyers and the legal system squeezing money from normal businesses trying to create new innovative products that ultimately help society. A must watch for everyone!
kwallsea Everyone should watch this. It is such a travesty of justice that ruins small businesses and innocent people's lives purely to line the pockets of unethical lawyers and judges hiding behind fake shell companies in empty offices most all of which are located in East Texas. This impacts every American. Please watch and let's do something about it!
aecolu It doesn't seem the show had much research. It is true patent trolls are a big issue and it is something that needs to be addressed. The key issue is when the patent office gives an allowance to a patent application that should not have been allowed. Patent claims must be novel and not obvious. The other problem is the burden of the people who are being sued in being the ones that need to show the invalidity of the patents.The show begins with the idea of shoe polishing as a patent being granted and the argument the show gives is that there is no patent on it. This is not true. If you can find shoe polishing in any literature whether it'd be novels, movies, or a news article then the patent claim fails the test and a patent cannot be granted.The show later then talks about the host being sued and shows a red box of the preamble of a claim and argues that's what the company suing him owns in their patent and it's so basic. A preamble is not the property of the person holding the patent, it is in fact prior art, it is what follows the preamble that is the property of the patent holder. The show misdirects viewers by showing you something that obviously shouldn't have received a patent, and which it wasn't. The red box are did not get patented, it is the following paragraphs after the word "comprising".Then the show goes on to US 6370535 and says they own the patent to "red box area" once again, rather than the claim. A look up of the patent and the independent claim you see it is much more specific than what the show's host claims. The host shows a basic simplified example of the patent and claims they own the right to anything of such, but when really they own the right to something much more specific.Throughout the show they argue patents are bad that you shouldn't be able to own an idea. This is a terrible notion. Lots of start-ups would be in danger of big companies simply copying their idea and squeezing them out if it was not for patents. The problem is frivolous patents.This show talks about an important problem in America, but I cannot give it more than 4 out of 10 because this is more like an YouTube rant by someone getting sued rather than an actual documentary that is well researched and well debated. It is heavily one-sided and misrepresented. In order to win the debate they present frivolous patents to be ridiculous frivolous by using red-boxes to highlight areas of more basic ideas that the patent holder does not own the right to, in an attempt the show shows the incompetency of the patent office. If the show had been true and shown actual patent claims and not just highlighting the preamble they will find it not as easy in debating whether the idea is novel or not, especially since a lot of these patents are almost 20 years old and soon to be expired.In another example the show talks about US 7778664, and first misdirects the viewers into thinking the patent was filed for in 2010 by focusing on the said date, when the date of filing is 2001. Secondly the host claims the patent gave the person claim over the rights to a telephone. When in reality this is a patent claim with priority in 2001 for a digital phone that you can make a video call with that also shows an image of yourself during the video call as well as blocks incoming calls of anyone on a blocked list. But the host claims the patent gave the inventor the rights to telephones in general, and that this happened in 2010.