The Jungle Book

2016 "The legend will never be the same."
7.4| 1h46m| PG| en| More Info
Released: 15 April 2016 Released
Producted By: Walt Disney Pictures
Country: United States of America
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website: http://movies.disney.com/the-jungle-book-2016
Synopsis

A man-cub named Mowgli fostered by wolves. After a threat from the tiger Shere Khan, Mowgli is forced to flee the jungle, by which he embarks on a journey of self discovery with the help of the panther, Bagheera and the free-spirited bear, Baloo.

... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Disney+

Director

Producted By

Walt Disney Pictures

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Clevercell Very disappointing...
Vashirdfel Simply A Masterpiece
Exoticalot People are voting emotionally.
Mjeteconer Just perfect...
The Couchpotatoes I remember going to the theater for the first time in my life. It was to see The Jungle Book from 1967 with my grandfather. I guess every kid saw that movie at least once in their lifetime. I was pretty impressed by the cartoon on a big screen. Now so many years later you get a decent adaptation of that cartoon with real looking animals. For the visual effects this movie is worth a watch, maybe not an Oscar worth movie, but still it is enjoyable. Certainly with the whole family, because it's more a kid movie than anything else. But adults can enjoy this movie as well. Seeing critics on here giving this movie the lowest rating possible is just ridiculous. You really never saw a worse movie? You must not watch alot of movies then. The Jungle Book is exactly what I expected it to be in 2016, a good adaptation of Rudyard Kiplings' book on big screen. And that with big names as narrating voices.
santhosh-10290 The movie was so interesting and excellent. The movie was very good with good vfx shots. BGM was good in the movie. The boy in the movie acted very well. The story was amazing.
Forn55 Appallingly bad. This mish-mash of new-age sentiments and zingy, slangy one-liners wrapped up in special visual effects has about as much to do with Kipling's wonderful adventure book as the Kardashians have to do with Oxford University. It's directed in a campy, wanna-be-cool style that can best be described as neo-faux Hollywooden car-chase. It uses animals instead of crash cars, but it boils down to much the same thing.Why (oh, why?) do film makers take wonderful books and trash them? Why do they take a genuinely moving tale and turn it into cotton candy? This movie is the cinematic equivalent of junk food.
sirkesine I have a very big respect of all the actors, filmmakers, animators ect.. But the truth is that some movies like that one, are bir waste of time.First of all, Neel Sethi the child actor cant act. He is so flat. Every scene is the same face. No emotion. Same flat face and act. No joy, no sadness and no fear.. alll the same face. Someday he wall be an actor, but now he is not. Ony good thing abouth this movie is CGI.. But not all CGI.. I like only the scene when seasons change. The rest of all is the same CGI effects. Talking animals, envirement, practical effects... all is not new... I give only 1 star for that seasons change scene.... rest off all is crap....Ant the worst part of it.. They shooting it again... Mowgli (2018).. Seriously ??? Enough of jungle book story...(if i have grammar mistake.. please forgive me.)