Pacionsbo Absolutely Fantastic

Brainsbell The story-telling is good with flashbacks.The film is both funny and heartbreaking. You smile in a scene and get a soulcrushing revelation in the next.

Bea Swanson This film is so real. It treats its characters with so much care and sensitivity.

Hattie I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

fishdish-75621 This movie - to my opinion - wasn't as bad as these other users say. There are things like and dislike about it.I'll start with what i disliked:The overuse of blood: Not to mention it was pink, FREAKING PINK, and it didn't look like blood at all, infact I wouldn't be suprised if it was just pink paint. In the traps where Bobby had to pull the fish hook out of that girl's mouth and the one where he had to hold up the weights with his legs, the spikes were hollow for a reason, they were pipes, when they impale their bodies the paint would squirt out of the pipes and it's pretty easy to see, and he part where Bobby pulls out his teeth had WAY more blood than it should have, I mean spilling out onto his shirt? Come on now.The plot was too simple: A guy lies about being a victim of a Jigsaw trap and becomes famous. I mean ANY of the actual victims can do the same thing, but I guess the writers had to have some kind of plot to fill in the majority of the movie. Additionally, the recurring plot involving Mark Hoffmen being Jigsaw's apprentice started to get a bit boring and all he did in this movie was come after Jill and kill her for trying to kill him. WAY too simple.The small amount of screen time of John and Dr. Gordon:Sure John Kramer may be dead, but flash backs with him are quite a common thing in the movies following Saw III, and he was in only two or three very short ones. Dr. Gordon made two appearances but they were also quite short, I know I'm not the only one who wanted to see him again in another movie, but only one to two minutes of screen time, really?What I DID like:The opening:It's traditional that a Saw movie opens with someone insignificant to the plot being in a trap, and if you ask me I thought it was the second best one contrary to popular belief (the first one being mute Art Blank Vs. that blinded guy). With this one having three people. This one really had me at the edge of my seat and what I really liked was how the the two boys agreed to have their ex be the one to die. You would think they would just try to kill one another like everone thought but nope, this time it had a twist, and I liked it. Plus it was in a public place where everyone could see it, making it quite quite different from the others.The car trap: Another one of my favorite traps. A group of people being punished for being a bunch extremely racist "skinheads" being trapped in a garage with only their leader to rely on also had me on the edge of my seat. Having to rip the skin off his back to be "taught that everyone is the same color on the inside", and how eveything got worse and worse as the timer went down made it made it even more intense. That's the kind of context that Saw needs more of!The appearance of Dr. Gordon:Unlike other Saw viewers, who expected this to happen, I didn't see this coming at all. Despite his short screen time, I was really exited to see him again, and after seeing him at the support group meeting, I knew there was later going to be something else happening involving him. The plot twist with him ending chaining up Hoffmen in the iconic (in lack of a better adjective) bathroom left me satisfied with the ending.

Raul Faust Well, what I'm about to say has probably been said by a thousand of people out there, but I'm giving my two cents to it anyway. Last saturday I had a date and we decided, in the end of the night, to watch "Saw 3d", since we knew there was a new "Saw" out there in the theaters, so nothing better than remembering how it all (supposedly) ended. Gruesomenesses apart, the film has a quickly pacing, so we're given entertaining scenes all the time. There is no time to rest-- unless to rest in peace, if you agree with me that TOO MANY people die in this horror story! Also, I can't remember being able to give my date a kiss after the movie started; you know, there is so much torture, pain and blood that you feel like the world is just a hostile place to live in. However, what bothered me the most about 2010's "Saw 3D" was the level of technology and perfeccionism from Jigsaw. I mean, every creepy machine just worked out perfectly. As people walk, everything just lights up. The machines start. The records play. I simply can't believe that nothing ever fails. Jigsaw must have been an extraordinary (or extreterrestrial) mechanical engineer to ramp up all that stuff. I know that such things have been already noticed in the past 65746705213 movies from this franchise, but, in here, things are TOO visible to be ignored. At least by me. And by my date, who will never invite me for anything after this insane idea of us (or of mine.... I must confess).

lorcan-61881 Saw VII,I never actually got around to seeing,after Saw VI,I drift away from it,moving in to my own house,paying bills and sh*t,well,now,due to Jigsaw coming out,which by the way,I'll review either on Sunday or tomorrow night,I watched..boy! Was I in for a great treat! Saw VII is the "final chapter" in the Saw series continuing on to the end. Saw VII is definitely one of the worst horror films ever,there was not one thing that I liked,other wise then that I thought the series was finally going to die of weakness,nope! Saw VII had some of the weakest ever acting and,the traps,OH MY GOD,THE TRAPS!!! The traps were so awful,they took up like so much time and they were so awful! Tobin Bell never actually returned at all and that was sad,probably saw a few private filmed scenes and was like..OH HELL NO! I don't know what Saw VIII:Legacy or otherwise known as Jigsaw will be like,so far I have heard mixed reviews but it dose'int look bad,so lets hope,Saw 1,2,3,6 will come back and not 4,5 and 7. Saw VIII is nothing,literally..NOTHING!!

bh_tafe3 The Saw series ends with a whimper rather than a bang in this underwhelming final installment which simply fails to take the time to set up its various twists and turns.For instance, we have a man who's lied about surviving a Jigsaw Trap who gets put in a trap for real, fair enough. But what actually happens to him? It doesn't look like he dies. Does he end up discredited? Does he end up a depressed and isolated man? Then we have this Jigsaw survivors group. Great idea, but, what happens to them? What's the end game? And finally we have the returning Dr Gordon (Cary Elwes). What a waste! Yes, I understand that he needs to be a Jigsaw disciple and that this makes sense, but surely they could have set this up better. He is in the opening scene and shows up at the Survivor Group, but what happened to his family? Did they break up? Did he disappear for a few months? Come on guys, if you're going to bring back a character after 5 movies, explain something.The one thing I do like in this movie is Detective Hoffman's ramboesque rampage. He is bug eyes crazy and I love his character. I didn't really care about him in Part 5, but in 6 and 7, I buy him as an interesting and dangerous psycho killer. There's also a nice trap with three corners of a love triangle and circular saw, but when is that happening? Who set this trap: Jigsaw, Hoffman or Amanda, or hell, was it Gordon? In the end this a poor final installment. It rushes through things, doesn't explain enough and looks cheaper than the previous ones. I didn't see it in 3D, but it's obvious which scenes pander to it. Hoffman tries to keep us interested, but his bonkers rampage isn't enough to save this. A poor ending, which causes me to fail the whole series. 3 good films out of 7 with a crap ending does not a worthwhile series make. Could have been better but oh well. It is what it is.