Psyche 59

1964 "The screen prowls the lonely place where lust hides!"
6| 1h34m| en| More Info
Released: 29 April 1964 Released
Producted By: Columbia Pictures
Country:
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

An industrialist's wife tries to remember the shocking sight that made her blind.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

Columbia Pictures

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Unlimitedia Sick Product of a Sick System
FuzzyTagz If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.
Allison Davies The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.
MarieGabrielle I am admittedly biased after seeing her in "The Subject Was Roses", an incredible achievement by Patricia Neal. That being said, this film "Psyche 59" deals with Neal and her seemingly caring husband Curd Jurgens (always believable as middle-aged man, malcontent).The story starts with Neal in her comfortable London town home, where she is blind due to a tragic accident five years earlier. Her sister Robin (Samantha Eggar) comes to stay with her, which for some reason annoys Jergens. We see the reason clearly as the film unwraps, Eggar's personality as she flirts with her sister's husband. It is rather hard to believe the storyline here that Robin (Eggar) is 17 in this film, as she looks to be about 30 in real life, and manner.If you can suspend the disbelief a bit (Eggar becomes shrill and annoying at the end, attempting to gain attention from Curt Jurgens).They stay at the grandmother's country estate for a beach vacation, and the grandmother is , as another reviewer mentioned, rather an extraneous character and its puzzling as to why she has been included in the film, even.Overall though while the story moves slowly at some points, keep watching for Patricia Neal. She saves the storyline and makes the film well worth your time. Recommended.
Poseidon-3 Made at a time when psychological dramas were enjoying popularity and at a stage when what could be depicted on screen was being tested with each new film, this movie showcases the talents of its star trio fairly well. Neal plays a blind woman, married to Jurgens, who is blind not because of any substantial injury or illness, per se, but because she has suffered some sufficient mental trauma to render her sightless – hysterical blindness. Her husband dotes on her while simultaneously seeming to resent her. Things get even stickier when Neal invites her baby sister Eggar back home to live with them. Eggar dates family friend Bannen, who already has a flirtatious rapport with Neal, while Jurgens struggles with an attraction to Eggar. Eggar, an unbelievably brazen and selfish person, leads him on deliberately, sometimes right under the nose of her sight-impaired sister. When Neal and Eggar head out to the country to visit grandmother March, with the gentlemen soon joining them, things take on a more upsetting tone, culminating in yet another traumatic series of events which call Neal's vision into question again. Neal, fresh off an Oscar win for "Hud," is captivating to watch here and retains most of the film's focus. Jurgens, although top-billed, is somewhat less central though he does an excellent job. His steely eyes are well-served by the stark black and white cinematography (which is wonderful throughout.) Eggar is impossibly young and delectable. She shows off an array of 60s fashions and hairstyles, but also gives a strong performance in a role that could have been played very one-dimensionally. Bannen is likable and solid in his less-than-magnetic character. He has the bad luck to be in love with a vixen. March portrays with some degree of restraint the highly atypical grandmother who seems almost devoid of affection and doesn't hand out praise easily. This type of film will not appeal to all viewers as it is at times heavy-handed and strains to be artsy. However, for those willing to take it in, it's a very interesting and engrossing piece. Certainly, the work of the three leads is very strong. In the second half, the focus gets blurry, the pace begins to drag and the motivations of the characters get a bit cloudy, but there are some great moments of tension and anxiety on display. A heavily dramatic score by Kenneth Jones punctuates the opening credits and the emotional scenes. Fans of the leads really can't afford to miss out on it.
fimimix I only found two other comments about this movie. How strange for such a gifted actress as Ms. Neal was, even before coming to Hollywood.I enjoyed watching Ms. Neal, but the two comemnts I read pretty-much says it all - lust between "Robin" (Samantha Eggar, the younger sister) and "Alison Crawford's" (Patricia Neal) hubby (Kurt Jurgens, he of the rugged handsomeness in his earlier days). All the stern looks between "Robin" and "Eric" don't fool anyone- "Robin" is spitefully tempting to seduce "Eric", who pretends he hates her.Poor "Alison", blind from a fall down the stairs, knows there is some heat someplace, but can't remember it - nor why she's blind. She's been told by physicians her eyes are perfect, but her brain won't let her "see". Add to this intrigue, handsome "Paul" (Ian Bannen) who is in love with and wants to marry "Robin", who uses him for her sadistic desires, and the playing gets uninterestingly rough. We all know that "Alison" is going to remember the crisis she can't "see" - Granny (somebody !) knows the whole story, and tells "Alison" "you were always greedy and took what you wanted". Guess what is was ? You're right - she "took" "Eric" and eventually "sees" he and "Robin" in a tight, romantic grip. End of story, except "Alison" smiles off into the sunlight, knowing she can finally "see" her children and everything will be o.k. without "Eric".As I write, without Ms. Neal, dud !!! The film is so old, younger people wouldn't even know-of too many of these actors/actresses.More interesting, I viewed this film on TCM, which showed a live interview with Ms. Neal afterward (I adored for her candidness). She had a good acting/film-career, but much tragedy in her private life - two debilitating strokes and an impossible romance with Gary Cooper, deaths and divorces, etc. Hardly able to conduct a normal life after her strokes, she made a courageous recovery and went-on in her career.The problem for release-dates of films is, you never know just when they were shot.......we now know that films can be shot much earlier than they were released, sitting "in the can" for years before some producer gets the balls to back them. Therefore, just enjoy Ms. Neal's acting and get over the truly "B" rating for this film. Director Alexander Singer didn't really direct: just gave-out the script and let the actors/actresses go-at-it. Julian (Halevy) Zimet wrote the script. Good for them - I recommend "Psyche 59" for a quiet evening, if you don't want to sleep on explosions and blood.........
russogerard "Psyche '59" opened at an art theatre in New York City in 1964. Receiving lukewarm reviews, it closed quickly, and was then used as a co-feature in neighborhood theatres. I consider it a near-masterpiece. Starring Patricia Neal, Curt Jurgens, and Samantha Eggar, it is a spellbinding study of a woman suffering from hysterical blindness, her sex addict husband, and her younger sister, who it seems was sexually imposed-upon at a young age, and who is both cruelly nymphomaniacal and masochistic as a result. This film was clearly ahead of its time. The screenplay by Julian Zimet, from a novel by Francoise des Ligneris, is a finely-nuanced piece of work.Alexander Singer might be considered a great director of films about women's issues, as well as a great director of actresses. Consider his direction of Lola Albright in "A Cold Wind in August" three years before, and his direction of Lana Turner in "Love Has Many Faces" the year following. The fact that all three of these films were failures is clearly the reason why Singer is not widely known ("Love Has" having failed simply because its critics and audiences could not appreciate its deliberately melodramatic style). The cinematography in "Psyche '59" is outstanding. One shot, in which the camera manages to look upward towards Samantha Eggar, while she is lying on the sand, took my breath away. Within the context of the scene, this use of strange camera angle was intensely effective, and not at all pretentious. Whether it was Singer's idea, or that of cinematographer Walter Lassally, I guess I'll never know.The only flaw in "Psyche '59" is that the actress in the role of the grandmother seems too young for the part.