CrawlerChunky
In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.
Hayden Kane
There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes
Allison Davies
The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
Roxie
The thing I enjoyed most about the film is the fact that it doesn't shy away from being a super-sized-cliche;
FlashCallahan
Jobe is resuscitated by Jonathan Walker, and he wants Jobe to create a special computer chip that would connect all the computers in the world into one network.Walker would control and use the system, But he doesn't realise a group of teenage hackers, and Patrick Bergin, are on to him and out to stop his plan. He also doesn't realise that Jobe is now the bloke from The Taking Of Beverly Hills and not Jeff Fahey......What is there to say? Yes the film is bad, there is no real explanation as to why Jobe is a I've, but he is, and when he's in cyber world, he turns into some strange Jim Carrey wannabe hybrid. The plot is silly, narrative is all over the place, and the cast know its ridiculous, but blimey Charlie, its a lot of fun to watch. The effects are really bad, even worse than Spawn, and Bergin looks totally bemused to be in this, its long way from the time he starred in that Robin Hood movie that didn't star Kevin Costner.Fewer really overacts, and despite his attempts to be menacing, he's just too camp, and becomes the reason why the film is so funny.Its rubbish, but its entertaining rubbish, but I cannot give it a rather higher than a four, because it is a fundamentally bad film, but not bottom 100 worthy.Plus its the best film ever to come as a special feature on the originals DVD.
jdkeaton1
Virtual Reality never went that far. There was some people who thought that it could become like real where you can have your own world and make it your way. And then they of course had what they called cyber sex so people would think that it was a way to have free love. Now the idea of VR is just silly and that is why the lawnmower man movies where funny. Of course 1 was better then 2. I think 2 was more like a kids movie because it had a group of kids as the main caractures up against a super villain trying to take over that world how childish is that. I think it is a movie for some depressed people who probably listen to Tool way too much.
Lee Eisenberg
When I saw "Lawnmower Man", I thought that it was one of the most interesting movies that I'd ever seen. When I saw "Lawnmower Man 2: Beyond Cyberspace" a few weeks later, I couldn't understand how it was supposed to be related to the first one. Containing a plot too confusing to discuss, not only did they not bring back Pierce Brosnan, it didn't even have the decency to bring back Jeff Fahey to play Jobe - although Matt Frewer isn't a bad actor otherwise. But the rest of the movie seems to be a series of randomly strung-together special effects.So anyway, if you watch the first one, you'll have seen all that you need to; there's no reason to waste your money on this one.
disdressed12
absolutely dreadful.who could have imagined such a disgraceful follow up to the first Lawnmower Man.i am almost stunned beyond words,but IMDb requires a minimum amount of lines,so here goes.very low budget and it looked it.horrible casting in the case of Matt Frewer,who this time around is supposed to be the title character.i can not take this guy seriously as an actor.he would be out of his depth in an elementary school play.the guy has no screen presence whatsoever.this a bad thing when the movie might possibly hinge on your performance.(although there is no fear of that happening in this dog,but still-Matt Frewer?)Jeff Fahey may not be the best actor,but he was perfectly cast for the original movie,and compared to Matt Frewer,he's Olivier.it is possibly that Olivier himself couldn't have saved this vomit,as it looked like it was a made with the change from a 20 dollar bill.less than 0*