Inserts

1976 "A degenerate film, with dignity."
6.3| 1h57m| NC-17| en| More Info
Released: 13 February 1976 Released
Producted By: United Artists
Country: United Kingdom
Budget: 0
Revenue: 0
Official Website:
Synopsis

A young, once-great Hollywood film director refuses to accept changing times during the early 1930s, and confines himself to his decaying mansion to make silent porn flicks.

... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Director

Producted By

United Artists

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

Kailansorac Clever, believable, and super fun to watch. It totally has replay value.
WillSushyMedia This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.
TrueHello Fun premise, good actors, bad writing. This film seemed to have potential at the beginning but it quickly devolves into a trite action film. Ultimately it's very boring.
Cheryl A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.
Lee Eisenberg The same year that he starred in "Jaws", Richard Dreyfuss played a very different role in John Byrum's "Inserts". This focus on a director whose trouble adjusting to the arrival of talkies has resulted in him directing porno flicks is quite shocking. I guess that the point is that the dreams that people had of going to Hollywood and becoming stars - whether in front of or behind the camera - were in vain.Jessica Harper's role as the moll interested in porno reminded me a bit of her aspiring singer in Brian DePalma's "Phantom of the Paradise". Bob Hoskins as the producer reminded me very much of his detective in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit" (incidentally, both movies focus on old Hollywood and mention the construction of freeways). As for Veronica Cartwright, this movie combined with "The Birds" and "Alien" makes her one versatile actress.All in all, this movie won't be for everyone, but I liked it.
capricorn9 Every one in a while you find a film of an actor that was made when they were starting out and wondered why it didn't get the attention it deserves. This is one. With a cast that includes almost newcomers Richard Drefus, Jessica Harper, Bob Hoskins and a grown up Veronica Cartwright, this film should have made more of a splash than it did. One of the first jobs outside school was as usher in a local multiplex back in the '70's and I remember this film because when it came out it went right to one of the smaller theatres that films were sent to after they had played the bigger theatres in the complex. No fanfare it just opened. I seem to recall it did OK business there but was gone in a couple of weeks. I think I saw it most nights I was there, or I would wander in on a break to catch a glimpse of a scene or two. When videos came out I got one and over the course of the years loaned and lost it. Then I searched EBay for one and finally got another copy. Within a couple of months I find a used DVD! It brings back a lot of memories of that theatre and working there. Seeing it now I realize again what I liked about it. It boarders on the fine line between comedy and drama and does it so delicately. After seeing it again, I also think it would make a great stage play. Now that it is out there in a more popular form, lets hope that more people see it.
paul winnett Hey kids here is something you might not know, RICHARD DREYFUSS IS A GREAT ACTOR! Probably because most of his better known performances are in blockbuster sci-fi shark movies, but, if you can ever catch this rarely seen gem of a movie, you may realize and remember what a powerhouse performer Dreyfuss is. As the impotent (both in the artistic and the important way)director reduced to making porn for the already slightly depraved young Hollywood. He is at once both funny and pathetic. The truly climactic scene with him and a never better Jessicar Harper as the mesmeric Cathy Cake ,is the rarest thing in a Hollywood movie, a genuinely erotic scene that IS essential to the story. OK this movie is very "stagey" but you could argue that as a film about film and acting as sexual expression its "stageyness" adds to the movies reality. The viewer feels like a voyeur. Anyway, this is totally a totally forgotten movie that has brilliant performances. WHY IS IT NEVER SHOWN.May your rope rise with you.
Dominick R This films plot centers around the making of, probably one of the first, porn movies, Sadly when it was released it was pre-arthouse cinemas and pre-video, so it was lumped in with second rate soft porn flic houses around soho London. Consequently it died a lonely death. Around this time Art house cinemas were starting to emerge in University towns which is how I caught it late night in Edinburgh. I was just knocked out by it's sharp drama wrapped in a comedy that launched incredibly incisive comment. Bob Hoskins character as the wannabee hood getting irate when he discovers that Richard Dreyfuss's character, the has-been director, has removed the camera from the tripod, in shear enthusiasm, as he filmed the sexual act. 'How is that going to look!' 'It's not going to look, it's going to be looked at!' retorts Richard Dreyfuss character. The economy of the lines are brilliant! Yes this is a one room drama, which is a tall order for cinema and few have conquered it but this film does brilliantly.